View clinical trials related to Bone Resorption.
Filter by:the goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the new osseo-densification technique works to provide enough bone width and quality prior to implant placement in the upper jaw the main question it aims to answer is: Is the use of osseo-densification protocol better than the standard alveolar ridge widening techniques; regarding efficiency and comfort in obtaining sufficient alveolar ridge width in horizontally atrophic alveolar ridges?
The aims of the study was to correlate the extent of the dimensional alveolar bone changes after tooth extraction and contextual guided bone regeneration with serum vit D levels in 14 patients. Moreover, at 4 months, a small bone sample was collected in order to correlate histological and immunohistochemical parameters of bone with vit D serum levels.
An interventional prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in parallel groups. The sample size consisted of 30 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of surgical intervention. The first group received implants with a sloped edge platform (Dentsply Sirona CIS, ASTRA TECH Implant System, registered in Russia on 21/12/2019, No. РЗН 2015/3214). The second group received implants with bone grafting. The assessment in the postoperative period included evaluating the condition of the soft tissues, bone resorption, number of analgesics, duration of the operation, edema, keratinized mucosa width, implant stability quotient, pain severity, and quality of life.
The study team is inviting 13 healthy people to complete a study to explore how calcium affects hormones and bones after eating. Participants will be asked to complete two study visits within eight weeks. Before each visit, participants will be asked to not eat or drink (except water) for 9 hours. At each visit, participants will eat the same meal provided by the research team. Along with their meal, they will take a pill - in one session, this will be a calcium supplement, and in the other, a placebo (a pill with no calcium), but they won't know which one they are taking at which session. A phlebotomist will draw blood before the meal and pill, then again several times after eating. Blood draws will take place over three hours. During that time, participants will complete questionnaires about health, diet, and physical activity. Blood will be analyzed to check on various health indicators, like bone health markers and certain hormones, to see how they change after the meal. The difference in these health indicators between the calcium and placebo sessions will help the study team understand the impact of calcium on health after eating. This could help increase knowledge of the impact of calcium on hormones and bone health.
split-mouth RCT, 25 months follow up. GBR protocol with LPRF as grafting material in the test group and autogenous bone with DBBM as grafting material in the control group.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety of placing TiO2 scaffolds in alveolar ridge and to evaluate if the scaffold material contributes to maintain the anatomy and the volume of the alveolar process after tooth extraction.
The investigators recruited 32 diabetic IOD patients with a total of 110 problematic implants who had completed the treatment for peri-implantitis between January 2021 and March 2023 as research subjects. The patients were randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group using the random number table. The control group received routine postoperative medical advice, whereas the experimental group was given an IMB model-based continuity of care.
Sinus floor elevation (SFA) and GBR have been applied in the placement of dental implants in longstanding edentate posterior maxilla region. However, the number of study on the efficacy of these procedure on areas with 0mm bone height is limited. This case study aims to compare two cases of 0mm bone height in the posterior maxillae region with different handling procedure. In this article, two female patients in their 40s underwent maxillary sinus augmentation (sinus lifting) due to longstanding missing posterior maxillary molars with the bone of which area had resorbed entirely, leaving 0mm bone height. One patient went through conventional sinus augmentation while the other had a two-stage - sinus - lift procedure. Researchers compared the bone - volume induced between the two procedures.
The aim of the present study was to compare the half-packed grafts that are covered with either a collagen or a nonresorbable membrane to the conventional alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving full-packed grafts and collagen membrane. The primary purpose was to evaluate the bone dimensional changes between the groups, and the secondary objective was to assess the potential contributing factors to clinical, radiographic and implant-related outcomes under different alveolar ridge preservation procedures.
two groups of inserted implants: trans-gingival and under-bone level; difference in the marginal bone loss at six months from placement between the two groups of implant positioned in the posterior atrophic maxilla