View clinical trials related to Bone Resorption.
Filter by:The aim of the study will be to evaluate maxillary anterior teeth replacement with immediate dental implant utilizing vestibular socket therapy versus ice cream cone technique both clinically and radiographically.
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is an invaluable and beneficial surgical technique adopted when there is the need to augment an alveolar atrophy. Strong clinical and histologic evidence exists on the effectiveness and predictability of GBR in bone augmentation of ridge deficiencies. On the other hand, it is well known that GBR remains a challenge as in the most extreme cases, it is considered a highly technique-sensitive surgical procedure. Whilst there are numerous reviews which report the average incidence of complications in GBR, there is still insufficient evidence and manuscripts reporting a direct correlation between a specific biomaterial (membrane or scaffold) and observed complications. Only one recent systematic review and meta-analysis focused on wound healing complications following GBR for ridge augmentation procedures. Authors explored the complication rate based on the membrane type and on the timing of the first sign of soft tissue complications following bone augmentation procedures. They reported a complication rate of 17% of the overall soft tissue complications, including membrane exposure, soft tissue dehiscence, and acute infection (abscess). This estimate is consistent with that reported (12%) in a more recent systematic appraisal of the evidence on all types of complications in GBR (3). However, when horizontal augmentation procedures were reviewed, a higher rate (21%) of complications was reported within the first 18 months of a GBR procedure. This estimate was inclusive of all possible biologic complications following GBR whilst the rate of membrane exposure was of 23%. Vertical bone augmentation represents one of the most challenging bone regenerative procedures in surgical dentistry. This is because of the inherent difficulties of the surgical procedure and the high risk of complications. The primary aim of this procedure is to recreate alveolar bone in a vertical direction (without the support of any pre-existing walls) and enable recreation of a more favourable anatomy for the restoration of the edentulous site. Evidence on a variety of treatment options has been produced over the last 15 years including distraction osteogenesis, onlay bone grafting, and vertical ridge augmentation (VRA). Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of different surgical procedures for VRA either in a staged or a simultaneous fashion, reported a range of vertical bone gain of 2-8 mm. This gain was gradually lost (1.27 to 2.0mm) between 1 to 7 years post-surgery and a wide range of complications (0- 45.5%) has been reported. The aim of this study is to assess and compare incidence of complications and percentage of vertical bone gain when using four different barrier membranes in combination with 50/50 autogenous and xenogenous bone material in VRA procedures. Secondary aims will be to evaluate and compare early and late soft tissue wound healing, gingival microvasculature and structure, patient reported outcomes and the prevalence of need for further bone augmentation and need for soft tissue grafting. Additionally, this study will also aim to assess and compare histomorphometry and histochemistry analyses of core biopsies obtained before implant placement between the four different barrier membranes.
An animal study and our pilot human study demonstrated that placing a smooth-surface titanium bone screw (TBS) over the buccal plate of an extraction socket resulted in less dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge along with no adverse effects. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of TBS application for ridge preservation in comparison to (1) unassisted/non-interventional socket healing and (2) alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) approach using allografts and a membrane.
comparing socket shield technique with early implant placement with contour augmentation in preserving the bone contour
This study aims to evaluate bone formation in grafts in terms of its quality (density), quantity (volume) and maturation obtained with the application of a tissue-engineered bone grafting compound containing concentrated autogenous cell-culture medium (CM) and a synthetic bone substitute. The present study was designed as an experimental prospective split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. After protocol approval by the Research Ethics Committee, a total of 20 consecutive participants in need of maxillary reconstruction aiming implant-supported oral rehabilitation will be invited to join the study. To collect autogenous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs), an outpatient lipoplasty procedure at the abdominal area of each patient will be performed. To isolate and expand hASCs from the lipoaspirate, specific cell culture protocols will be followed, resulting in cultured viable cells and their conditioned medium (CM). Cells and CM will be then separated by a sequence of filters and centrifugation, and isolated CM will be frozen. ELISA will analyze the presence of chemokines and their concentration in CM before grafting. Following pre-op surgical planning, both maxillary sinuses of each patient will be grafted internally applying a lateral window to each sinus. The bony floor of the test maxillary sinus will be augmented with synthetic bone substitute (BoneCeramic™ 1-2 mm) mixed with 10 to 15 ml of CM (test). The control site will receive bone substitute with saline. Lateral windows in both sinuses will be then closed with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide™). After 6 months, first-stage implant surgery will be performed placing 6 implants in each patient. Registration of implant stability by manual torque wrench will be performed. Also, bone biopsies from each drilled implant site will be collected for histology, histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry (RT-PCR). Tomographic evaluation of the bone formation will include cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) at pre-operative [Baseline], 90 [T1] and 180 [T2 = implant placement] days for bone 3D image analysis.
When a dental extraction is performed, sequential cascade of events happens that lead to a modeling and remodeling of the area. This phenomenon leads to bone resorption and consequential volume loss atrophy. In literature several biomaterials (Autogenous, alloplastic, allografts and xenografts) were tested as alveolar fillers with the aim of controlling this physiologic event. Socket preservation is today a very widely spread dental technic to preserve the alveolar dimensions, that uses a wide range of biomaterials. Alloplastic materials have a fair evidence to work in several regenerative procedures in the oral and maxillofacial region. This pilot trial aims to characterize Histologic bone healing pattern in a human socket preservation model of 2/3 biphasic calcium sulfate cement matrix's and Hydroxyapatite (HA granules). Alterations in Volumetric alveolar socket changes in a socket preservation clinical model will also be studied.
Cycling is commonly questioned whether it provides adequate mechanical strain on bone as many elite cyclists have been found to have a low bone mass. However, it remains unclear if this is due to cycling or low energy availability. In addition, acute dietary energy restriction has been found to be accompanied by an imbalance in bone remodelling with reduced bone formation. The objective of this proposal is to examine whether short-term energy restriction leads to changes in markers of bone formation and resorption at rest and in response to cycling in young adults. Specifically, the study will examine changes in circulating bone markers in 15 males and females (ages 18-24) both at rest and following one 45-minute spinning class both before and after one week of restricted energy intake. Blood will be drawn at rest (pre-trial, fasted), and 3 times post-trial (5 min, 1h and 24h); then analysed for biochemical markers of bone formation (BAP and OPG) and resorption (CTX and RANKL) to assess the impact of energy restriction on bone at rest and in response to exercise. This innovative work has potential to make significant advances in understanding tissue growth and development in response to exercise and malnutrition.
Vertical bone height has always presented challenge for the clinicians especially in the anterior aesthetic zone. Therefore, this trial will attempt to compare whether better vertical bone height and implant placement technique can be achieved using simultaneous implant placement with the sandwich osteotomy, which is a time saving procedure performed in a single stage surgery; when compared to using fixation plates to support the segment followed by delayed implant placement.
This study is aiming to evaluate clinically, radiographically ,and histologically GBR using collagen membrane in combination with a mixture of ABBM and autogenous particulated bone compared to collagen membrane with ABBM in atrophied anterior maxilla.
Histological Measurement Comparing the density of the new bone formed during socket preservation technique using a Mixture of Anorganic Bovine Bone(ABB) And Autogenous Particulate vs a Mixture of Injectable Platelets Rich Fibers, ABB And Autogenous Particulates (sticky bone). radiographical measurements of the amount of bone dimensions changes in socket preservation technique in 6-month period using a Mixture Of Anorganic Bovine Bone(ABB) And Autogenous Particulate vs a Mixture Of Injectable Platelets Rich Fibers, ABB And Autogenous Particulates (sticky bone)