Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Theta-Burst Stimulation (TBS) in Major Depressive Episodes With Mixed Characteristics in Bipolar and Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability.
NCT number | NCT04123301 |
Other study ID # | MORENO-2019 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 8, 2019 |
Est. completion date | May 1, 2021 |
The investigators will perform a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in mixed depressive episodes of both bipolar and major depressive disorders. Will be selected 90 patients aged 18-65 years with diagnosis of TB (I or II) or MDD in moderate or severe major depressive episode with mixed features. The primary endpoint of efficacy will be a continuous outcome of change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to week 3.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | May 1, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Current mixed depression in any mood disorder (bipolar I, bipolar II or major depressive disorder) assessed with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score = 20 points AND Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score = 1 point in 3 or more items. - Any appropriate first or second line pharmacological regimen in accordance with CANMAT guidelines to treat a major depressive episode in major depressive disorder (Agomelatina 25-50 mg/dia; Bupropiona 150-300 mg/dia; Citalopram 20-40 mg/dia; Desvenlafaxina 50 - 100 mg/dia; Duloxetina 60 - 120mg/dia; Escitalopram 10 - 20 mg/dia; Fluoxetina 20 - 60 mg/dia; Fluvoxamina 100 - 300 mg/dia; Mirtazapina 15 - 45 mg/dia; Paroxetina 20 - 60 mg/dia; Sertralina 50 - 200 mg/dia; Venlafaxina 75 - 225 mg/dia; Vortioxetina 10 - 20 mg/dia; Amitriptilina 150 - 300 mg/dia; Imipramina 150 - 300 mg/dia; Clomipramina 150 - 200 mg/dia; Nortriptilina 75 - 150 mg/dia; Trazodona 150 - 300 mg/dia; Quetiapina 150 - 300mg/dia), bipolar I (Quetiapina 300 - 600 mg/dia; Lítio litemia 0,6 - 1,2 mEq/L; Lamotrigina 100 - 200 mg/dia; Lurasidona 40 - 80 mg/dia; Lítio/Divalproato + Lurasidona; Lítio/Divalproato + Lamotrigina; Olanzapina 5 - 20 mg/dia + Fluoxetina 20 - 60 mg/dia; Divalproato de sódio; Lítio/Divalproato + ISRS/Bupropiona) or bipolar II disorder (Quetiapina 300 - 600 mg/dia; Lítio; Lamotrigina; Bupropiona; Sertralina; Venlafaxina). Exclusion Criteria: - Concomitant diagnosis of other neuropsychiatric disorders such as: schizophrenia, dementias, mental retardation, organic mental disorder, or epilepsy; - Acute suicide ideation (assessed by interview and clinical evaluation); - Suspected or confirmed pregnancy; - Women in breastfeeding; - Severe or unstable clinical disease; - Specific contraindications to TBS: previous epileptic seizures; change in electroencephalogram at some point in life; previous stroke; previous severe TBI (with neurosurgery); metallic object on head (except mouth) as projectile piece, surgical clip, welding fragments; any implanted device (cardiac pacemaker, intravenous catheter). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo | Sao Paulo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Sao Paulo |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 3. | Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 6. | Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at week 3. | Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 13-19 - hypomania; 20-25 - mild mania; 26-37 - moderate mania ; 38-60 - severe mania. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at week 6. | Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 13-19 - hypomania; 20-25 - mild mania; 26-37 - moderate mania ; 38-60 - severe mania. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Response rate using Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 3 | Reduction of 50% or more of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Response rate using Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 6. | Reduction of 50% or more of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in each patient in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Remission rate using Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 3 | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) < 11 points in each patient in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Remission rate using Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 6. | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) < 11 points in each patient in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; 35 - 60 - severe depression. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A scale) at week 3. | Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A scale) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 0-17 - mild anxiety; 18-24 moderate anxiety; 25-30 - severe anxiety. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A scale) at week 6. | Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A scale) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 0-17 - mild anxiety; 18-24 moderate anxiety; 25-30 - severe anxiety. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale of Severity (GCI-S) at week 3. | Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale of Severity (GCI-S) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 1- not sick; 2- very mild disease; 3- mild disease; 4- moderate disease; 5- intense disease; 6- severe disease; 7- extremely severe disease. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale of Severity (GCI-S) at week 6. | Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale of Severity (GCI-S) in each patient in both interventional groups. The outcome will be assessed by a continuous change using a mixed models statistic. The scale range is: 1- not sick; 2- very mild disease; 3- mild disease; 4- moderate disease; 5- intense disease; 6- severe disease; 7- extremely severe disease. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-brief scale) at week 3. | Change in the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-brief scale) in both interventional groups.The scale range is: 26 to 130 points. Increase is a better and reduction is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-brief scale) at week 6. | Change in the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-brief scale) in both interventional groups.The scale range is: 26 to 130 points. Increase is a better and reduction is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale at week 3. | Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 1 to 100 points. Increase is a better and reduction is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale at week 6. | Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 1 to 100 points. Increase is a better and reduction is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Biological Rhythm Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) at week 3. | Change in Biological Rhythm Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 18 to 72 points. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Biological Rhythm Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) at week 6. | Change in Biological Rhythm Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 18 to 72 points. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Change in Barratt Impulsivity Scale of 11 items (BIS-11) at week 3. | Change in Barratt Impulsivity Scale of 11 items (BIS-11) in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 30 to 120 points. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 3. | |
Secondary | Change in Barratt Impulsivity Scale of 11 items (BIS-11) at week 6. | Change in Barratt Impulsivity Scale of 11 items (BIS-11) in both interventional groups. The scale range is: 30 to 120 points. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. | |
Secondary | Frequency of adverse events in UKU-SERS Scale at week 6. | Frequency of adverse events in UKU-SERS Scale in both interventional groups.The scale range is: 0 to 57 points. Reduction is a better and increase is a worse outcome. | From baseline until week 6. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05111548 -
Brain Stimulation and Cognitive Training - Efficacy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02855762 -
Targeting the Microbiome to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Bipolar Disorder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05915013 -
Alpha-Amino-3-Hydroxy-5-Methyl-4- Isoxazole Propionic Acid Receptor Components of the Anti-Depressant Ketamine Response
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05206747 -
Ottawa Sunglasses at Night for Mania Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02513654 -
Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Repeat Dosing Lamotrigine in Healthy Chinese Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06313918 -
Exercise Therapy in Mental Disorders-study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02304432 -
Targeting a Genetic Mutation in Glycine Metabolism With D-cycloserine
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06197048 -
Effect of Nutritional Counseling on Anthropometry and Biomarkers in Patients Diagnosed With Schizophrenia/Psychosis or Bipolar Affective Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03497663 -
VIA Family - Family Based Early Intervention Versus Treatment as Usual
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284813 -
Families With Substance Use and Psychosis: A Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02212041 -
Electronic Cigarettes in Smokers With Mental Illness
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05030272 -
Comparing Two Behavioral Approaches to Quitting Smoking in Mental Health Settings
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04298450 -
ED to EPI: Using SMS to Improve the Transition From the Emergency Department to Early Psychosis Intervention
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03641300 -
Efficacy of Convulsive Therapies for Bipolar Depression
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04432116 -
Time and Virtual Reality in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02893371 -
Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02909504 -
Gao NARASD Lithium Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02970721 -
Use of Psychotropic Medications Among Pregnant Women With Bipolar Disorder
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02481245 -
BezafibrateTreatment for Bipolar Depression: A Proof of Concept Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03088657 -
Design and Methods of the Mood Disorder Cohort Research Consortium (MDCRC) Study
|