View clinical trials related to Bipolar Disorder.
Filter by:The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI-007 (Lumateperone) in patients diagnosed with Bipolar I or Bipolar II disorder having a major depressive episode. The study will be conducted in two parts, Part A and Part B. Part A is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In Part B, patients who safely complete participation in part A may be enrolled in an open-label extension.
When the investigators are caught up in emotions, it is by stepping back (or decentering) that the investigators are able to see the situation from another perspective. Individuals with emotional disorders, however, can have difficulties in being able to do this. Research has shown that improving an individual's ability to step back from their emotions and take perspective is possible and can have beneficial effects on depressive symptomatology (Self Distancing and Perspective Broadening [SDPB] training). The SDPB training package involves two techniques: 1) stepping back from situations using mental imagery (building a mental picture of the situation and changing the distance to it) and, 2) reframing situations using perspective broadening reappraisals (giving new meanings to situations). The training package trains these SDPB techniques using an individual's memories and every day events. The fortnightly training comprises of two one to one sessions and daily homework for a week in between.The SDPB training package is aimed at improving an individual's ability to step back from, and put a new meaning to emotional events that take place in their lives. The prospective pilot study aims to investigate whether the SDPB training package reduces symptomatology and improves these abilities in individuals who experience both depressive and manic episodes (Bipolar Disorder [BD]). BD has a cumulative lifetime prevalence ranging from 1.52% across Europe and is treated with moderate success using Cognitive Behavioural therapy (CBT). However, 'moderate success' is considerably low compared to other mental health problems and CBT can be time time consuming, expensive, and cognitively demanding (requiring a high level of functioning of one or more cognitive functions). Accordingly, BD may be one of the emotional disorders in greatest need of novel and evidence based treatments.
This study consists of three separate appointments including a clinical assessment (interview and questionnaires), a blood draw, a social stress test, and a brain MRI.
Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are dying younger than the general population; cancer is a leading cause of death in this population. People with SMI have higher rates of dying from breast, lung, and colon cancer, and disparities in treatment appear to be one contributing factor. Individuals with SMI may be diagnosed with more advanced stage cancer and less likely to receive stage-appropriate cancer treatment. Although collaborative care models integrating medical and psychiatric care have shown promise in other populations, the challenge of treating SMI and cancer is distinct and relatively understudied. Patients may have uncontrolled psychiatric symptoms that can impact their understanding of their diagnosis and treatment decisions. Oncologists have less training and inadequate time to address multiple unmet needs. Mental health care is frequently fragmented from cancer care. The investigators want to understand if it is helpful for patients with SMI to be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager when cancer is diagnosed. Optimizing psychiatric symptoms and facilitating communication between the patient, the oncology team, and mental health providers may improve care. The goal is to pilot a pragmatic intervention for patients with cancer and SMI that can be integrated into cancer care, is acceptable to patients and oncology clinicians, and may promote the delivery of stage-appropriate cancer treatment to an underserved population. Patients will be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager at cancer diagnosis who will follow the patient and communicate with the oncology team during the 12 week intervention. All participants will complete brief surveys at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Oncology clinicians will provide feedback about the intervention at 12 weeks. Cancer treatment received and healthcare utilization will be assessed at 6 months post-intervention.
Depression and suicidal ideation/attempt/death are major causes of morbidity and mortality from psychiatric illnesses. In 2009, the World Health Organization listed depression as the leading cause of years lost due to disability worldwide. Suicide is the 9th most common cause of death in Canada with 1.6% of Canadians ultimately dying from suicide (Statistics Canada, 2012) and the 2nd most common cause of death in young people after accidental deaths. This information highlights the importance of finding treatments to prevent suicidal deaths. Ketamine has been shown to provide rapid treatment response for major depressive episodes both in major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), via a single intravenous infusion which persists for at least 72 hours. The purpose of this study is to conduct a pilot trial of IV ketamine + treatment as usual (TAU) vs. midazolam (an active placebo) + TAU to estimate sample size for a full-scale RCT examining these treatments for decreasing suicidal ideation among depressed inpatients with major depressive disorder and bipolar depression. A total of 52 patients will be recruited for this trial. All subjects will be inpatients at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre with a diagnosis of either major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder type I or II currently depressed. Suicidal ideation must be present at baseline assessment in order to be included in the study. Thirteen subjects will be randomized to each treatment arm in each treatment stream - that is, 13 will be recruited to ketamine + TAU in the major depressive disorder stream, and 13 will be recruited to the midazolam + TAU in the major depressive stream. Likewise, 26 subjects with bipolar depression will be randomized to these two treatments.
Preclinical and clinical data as well as mechanistic justification have been presented suggesting citicoline and pregnenolone are each promising treatments for alcohol use in BPD. Both appear to have favorable side effect profiles and no known drug-drug interactions. Thus, they have the potential to be safely used in a dual diagnosis population already taking other medications. A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled adaptive design study of citicoline and pregnenolone is proposed in 199 persons with alcohol use disorder and bipolar I or II disorder or schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type). The primary aim will be to assess change in alcohol use. Biomarkers of alcohol use, alcohol craving, mood and cognition will also be assessed. Relationships between neurosteroid and choline levels and the outcome measures will be explored.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of atypical antipsychotic medication increases the risk of hospitalization for a hyperglycemic emergency. The investigators will carry out separate population-based cohort studies using administrative health databases in eight jurisdictions in Canada and the UK. Cohort entry will be defined by the initiation of a new antipsychotic medication. Follow-up will continue until hospitalization for a hyperglycemic emergency or the end of 365 days. The results from the separate sites will be combined to provide an overall assessment of the risk of hyperglycemic emergencies among new users of various antipsychotic drugs.
Study in 400 patients with bipolar disorder I or II, of relapse risk factors. The principal objective of this research is to test the predictive value of core vulnerability dimensions such as affective instability and emotional reactivity, measured by validated questionnaires (AIM and ALS) on recurrence of affective major episode (depressed, hypomanic or manic) during a 24 months prospective follow-up. In addition, several arguments suggest that inter-individual variability in the risk of relapse is influenced by genetic factors. In particular, the implication of such factors have been demonstrated in rapid cycling or antidepressants induced mania. However, this has never been tested in cohorts followed prospectively. Finally, the existence of neuropsychological deficits in bipolar disorder is well documented and their role in the risk of relapse is suspected. Yet the nature of these deficits, their origin and evolutionary course remain poorly investigated. In summary, the secondary objectives of this research are the study of the influence of these other clinical, neuropsychological and genetic factors on the risk of relapse. • Scientific rationale The dimensions of affective instability and emotional reactivity, are considered core psychological and temperamental vulnerability dimensions to bipolar disorder. Differences in levels of instability and reactivity may account for the inter-individual variability observed in bipolar disorder in terms of risk of relapse. These dimensions are measured using validated questionnaires (Affective Instability Measure (AIM) and Affective Lability Scale (ALS)). Relapsing is defined as the occurrence of a depressive episode, hypomanic, manic or mixed episode (DSMIV criteria). Other factors that may influence the risk of relapse have been suggested in the literature but have not been formally tested in prospective studies: 1. cognitive deficits: the existence of neuropsychological deficits in bipolar disorder are well documented and their role in the risk of relapse is suspected. Yet the nature of these deficits, their origin and their course remain poorly investigated. Indeed, some appear to be related to the neurotoxicity of the episodes themselves, the other being related to the vulnerability to bipolar disorder 2. The involvement of genetic vulnerability factors in bipolar disorder is widely demonstrated. Several arguments suggest the implication of genetic factors in the risk of relapse. This is the case for some outcome patterns such as rapid cycling or antidepressants induced mania. Again, this has never been tested in cohorts followed prospectively. 3. The role of certain inflammatory and infectious factors in the etiology of bipolar disorder has been suggested but it is clear whether these biomarkers are "state" or "traits". Thus, the role of neurotoxic inflammatory or infectious factors in relapse mood has never been tested in a prospective follow up studies. - Main objective of the project To determine if the scores of AIM and ALS, assessed at baseline in euthymic bipolar patients is associated with relapse in patients during a 2 years follow-up period. - Secondary objectives of the project Determine if the neuropsychological performance at T0, measured in euthymic patients predict relapse during a 2 years follow-up period. Determine whether the neuropsychological deficits observed in euthymic bipolar patients that contribute to functional impairment worsen with time. DNA collection to test the involvement of candidate genes Serum collection to study the biological and infectious biomarkers • Methodology Prospective follow up studies. Multicenter.
This study evaluates whether prospective pharmacogenetic testing is cost-effective in affecting clinical treatment outcomes in patients with early-phase psychosis.
The clinical use of clozapine has been an unequivocal advance in the treatment of schizophrenia, a chronic and severe mental illness. A wealth of clinical data demonstrates it offers enhanced efficacy on both positive and negative symptomatology, improving cognition, functioning and quality of life. It is also associated with improved compliance and a continued efficacy in long-term treatment that can be translated into a reduction of suicidality and all-cause mortality. Because of preclinical evidence that it modulates neuroplasticity and prefrontal cortex connectivity, clozapine may be an interesting strategy for further severe psychotic illnesses. Nevertheless, even considering the growing use of other atypical antipsychotics in the management of bipolar disorder, a role for clozapine has been poorly defined. The clinical evidence-base for its use in this condition is largely based on uncontrolled naturalistic trials and retrospective studies and chart reviews. Several of these have supported clozapine's efficacy in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Possibly because of clozapine's profile of adverse effects and lack of interest from pharmaceutical companies, only two randomized trials have examined its effectiveness. Both suggest clinically relevant antimanic and mood-stabilizing properties. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of clozapine for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Secondary objectives include examining the effects of treatment with clozapine on cognition and functioning of patients with bipolar disorder. Tolerability and safety of long-term clozapine use will also be examined. To that end, the investigators will conduct a clinical trial with 54 patients with a history of treatment resistance. Patients will be randomized to either open-label treatment with clozapine, in combination with lithium or valproate, or open-label treatment with an atypical antipsychotic with consistent evidence of efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone), also in combination with lithium or valproate. Patients will be followed for one-year and time to all-cause treatment failure will be the primary outcome measure. It is the belief of the investigators that this study will generate meaningful clinical data of tremendous importance to validate clozapine as a legitimate treatment option for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder.