View clinical trials related to Bariatric Surgery Candidate.
Filter by:Previous studies have investigated the outcomes of Knee Arthroplasty (KA) following Bariatric Surgery (BAS), but with substantial limitations as not stratifying for Body Mass Index (BMI) at time of KA or not addressing the type of BAS (gastric bypass, banding or sleeve). Since BMI varies greatly in patients with previous BAS, it is likely that BMI affects outcomes after KA in BAS-operated patients. The investigators believe that stratifying for BMI would explain the contradictions with the previous research in this patient group when it comes to the risk of revision after KA.
This will be a prospective, obesity-registry based, single-blind randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Specific inclusion criteria are all patients eligible to undergo a Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) based on the current National Institute of Health (NIH) patient selection guidelines. Patients should be able to give consent, be deemed medically-cleared to undergo elective surgery, and tolerate general anesthesia. All enrollments and surgeries in this study will take place at the Cleveland Clinic Bariatric and Metabolic Institute. The study will consist of 2 interventions: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG). The primary objective is early postoperative pain, but also surgeon ergonomics and patient quality of life will be compared. Additional outcomes include 30-day perioperative results, minor and major morbidities, serious adverse events, resolution of medical comorbidities, and weight loss in percent of excess weight lost (%EWL) at one year.
Bariatric Surgery for morbid obesity is indicated when BMI > 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities or BMI > 35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities. Different surgeries performed for obesity are classified as restrictive, malabsorptive, and hybrid procedures. Because laparoscopic surgery has increased the interest and growth of bariatric surgery, soaring demand for laparoscopic bariatric surgery from patients has boosted the boom in bariatric surgery worldwide. Achieving pneumoperitoneum is the initial and one of the most crucial steps in any laparoscopic surgery, giving the surgeon working space to operate on a particular organ/organ system. Usually, pneumoperitoneum is achieved either by a closed technique with a veress needle or an open technique with many variations like finger assisted or the conventional open technique. Given the excess amount of subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients, putting a veress needle to achieve pneumoperitoneum successfully is particularly challenging which takes a toll on the operating surgeon when he/she is trying to locate the midline one can either overshoot to cause omental emphysema or undershoot getting lost in the subcutaneous fat. It is usually done in the supra umbilical area. Sometimes, due to previous surgical scars other sites are preferred. Sonography is routinely used by radiologists with negligible radiation exposure. Anesthesiologists in the operating room have used it for many assisted procedures like central line insertion / giving nerve blocks. It can also be used in obese patients undergoing metabolic surgery to assist in creating pneumoperitoneum by a veress needle. Advantages of Intraoperative ultrasonography in this particular study : 1. To quantify the thickness of subcutaneous fat 2. To visualise the linea alba and guide the veress needle safely into the peritoneal cavity 3. Real-time visualisation of the pneumoperitoneum created 4. Avoid complications like omental emphysema, bowel or vascular injury
Obesity is associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has in several randomized controlled trials (RCT) been shown to be superior to best medical therapy in the treatment of T2D. In the area of CVD, RCT after MBS are lacking. It was recently demonstrated in a cohort study that MBS in patients with severe obesity and a previous myocardial infarction (MI) was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of death and new MI. The aim of this proposal is to confirm this in a nationwide RCT. Using the nationwide SWEDEHEART database patients with severe obesity and a previous MI will be identified. They will be contacted and offered participation. After informed consent the patients will be randomized to MBS or optimized care (including visit with a cardiologist and optimization of secondary preventive measures and referral to dietician/physiotherapist). The primary outcome measure is a major cardiovascular adverse event (MACE). Secondary outcome measures include mortality, new MI, stroke, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Tertiary outcome measures include health related quality of life and surgical complications. Patients will be followed in the nationwide metabolic surgery register SOReg, the national inpatient register, national cause of death register, the Swedish prescribed drug register, and the Swedish population register. If positive results these can be included in guidelines for MBS.
By studying "in vivo" new possible predictive factors of increased bone turnover and risk of fractures after bariatric surgery, our study aims to improve health not only musculoskeletal but general of patients with severe obesity, a pathology which represents one of the main causes of disability and mortality.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of remotely-delivered interventions (utilizing acceptance-based behavioral treatment skills (ABTi)) amongst bariatric surgery populations who are experiencing weight regain postoperatively (> 5% from their lowest postoperative weight and after postoperative Month 6). Investigators aim to evaluate ABTi's efficacy for reversing weight regain and its effect on targeted weight control behaviors and weight-related comorbidities by comparing participants randomly assigned ABTi (n = 100) to those assigned to a Control group that also receives brief phone calls but that focus on reiterating instruction on the dietary and behavioral changes required of surgery and initially taught preoperatively (C, n = 100). The main research aims are: 1. To compare changes in body weight over 12 months in 200 bariatric patients who have regained > 5% of their weight and are randomly assigned to ABTi or Control. 2. To compare changes in eating behaviors (i.e., caloric intake, frequency of maladaptive eating behaviors), physical activity, and weight-related comorbidities (i.e., biomarkers of diabetes, hypertension) over 12 months in the two groups. 3. Exploratory - To test ABTi's theoretical mechanisms of action, including a) effects of theory-based active ingredients (i.e., acceptance, defusion, values clarity, mindfulness) on weight outcomes and b) changes in impact of internal states (i.e., hunger, cravings) on eating behavior.
The goal of this clinical trial is to figure out if 8 weeks of walking exercise before bariatric surgery improves risk factors for diabetes and other markers of health. This is important as it may help reduce complications after surgery, improve health markers and increase physical activity levels after surgery (which is an important marker of maintaining bariatric weight loss). The main question that this study is trying to answer is whether walking improves a risk factor for type 2 diabetes called insulin sensitivity (how well your body is able to use glucose). Adults planning to have bariatric surgery will be recruited from the Charlottesville VA area. Before they have their surgery, participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to a group that participates in 8 weeks of walking on a treadmill (2-3 times a week) or a group that does their normal care before bariatric surgery. Researchers will compare the effects of walking before bariatric surgery on: - Insulin sensitivity (diabetes risk factor) - Health of blood vessels - Rate of complications after surgery - Weight - Body Fat - Fitness level
Assessment of the effect of gabapentin as an analgesic replacement on the Kidney function following Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for Morbid Obese Patients by measuring two biomarkers: NGAL (Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin)and DKK3 (Dickkopf-3)
The classic RYGB is in most patients with a BMI ≥45 technically not feasible. Two alternatives are the Extended Pouch Gastric Bypass and the One Anastomosis gastric bypass. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial the investigators aim to establish which technique leads to more weightloss in bariatric patients with a BMI ≥45.
To investigate the real incidence of short and long-term anemia after bariatric surgery, and explore the risk factors.