View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The goal of this pilot, non-controlled, non-randomised, single centre, prospective intervention feasibility study is to assess the feasibility of a home DC-ECV in the treatment of recurrent symptomatic AF performed by APP in 25 patients. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Primary objective: In this prospective intervention feasibility study, in 25 patients the primary endpoint is completion of cardioversion to sinus rhythm. (% of study patients with a recurrence of AF in whom a home cardioversion is performed, i.e. to whom at least one DC shock was administered while the patient was under sedation). Feasibility endpoints are ; (a) evaluation of enrolment of participants, (b) evaluation and refinement of data and outcome collection procedures, (c) evaluation of logistics, (d) evaluation of the appropriateness of the intervention and research procedures to manage and implement the intervention, and (e) preliminary evaluation of participant responses to the intervention. Secondary objectives: Safety endpoint: Complications immediately during and one hour after cardioversion (e.g. arrhythmias, changes in the electrocardiogram, hypotension related to sedation and/or vasodilation or skin irritation). A composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurring within 24 hours MACCE occurring during 6 weeks follow-up; any hospitalisation and all-cause mortality during 6 weeks follow-up; number (%) of patients in sinus rhythm at 1 hour in the post-shock observation period; idem at the end of 6 weeks follow-up; inventory of all interventions in the study related to cost-of-care.
Therapeutic management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is based either on heart rate control or on rhythm control, a strategy which aims to maintain a normal heart rhythm. The benefit in terms of morbidity and mortality of a normal heart rhythm would, however, be largely offset by the frequent side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs which could even lead to an increase in mortality compared to rate control. This increase has particularly been suggested in people aged over 75. Since the emergence of catheter Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI), an effective alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs has become available. This technique makes it possible to isolate the foci triggering AF under local or general anesthesia with greater effectiveness than medications and very low risks. Records in the elderly do not seem to show a reduction in effectiveness or an increase in complications. However, in the absence of a dedicated randomized study, its use is strongly limited in the elderly where rate control (52% of people over 65 years old) and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs are largely favored due to the simplicity of implementation and the low cost of medications. However, an early rhythm control strategy seems to reduce cardiovascular events in relatively old individuals (average age 70 years). The use of PVI in first line could make it possible to further improve these results. The objective of the investigator is therefore to carry out the first randomized comparative study proposing to evaluate the impact of early PVI compared to usual treatment in patients aged 75 and over with AF.
The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to identify the onset of a stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset. This is a multicenter, prospective observational single-arm trial with a registry-based propensity matched control population. A total of 500 patients will be included in the trial. An interim analysis will determine if the stroke onset frequency is sufficient to determine the main outcome. Should the number of stroke events differ from what is expected at interim analysis, study enrollment will continue to increase cohort size. Patients who meet the criteria for participation will, after signing consent, be included and receive the Stroke Alarm bracelets that are used for 3 months. Study data will be collected as baseline at inclusion, at follow-up 3 months after inclusion and by using national Swedish registry data after completion of the study. Patients with elevated stroke risk according assessed by presence of specific criteria associated with elevated risk caused by: 1. recent TIA, OR 2. recent stroke without persisting arm motor deficit, OR 3. atrial fibrillation A control population matched for age, sex, NIHSS score and health care region will be identified in the Swedish national stroke registry, Riksstroke, and used for comparison. The combined efficacy goal is at least 60% sensitivity for Stroke Alarm b of stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset (with a 95% confidence interval above 30%) and a specificity of at least 80% using a clinical stroke diagnosis as gold standard.
This study explores the relationship between myocardial fibrosis and patient outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), specifically after catheter ablation. It aims to use Cardiac CT, an accessible tool, to measure left ventricular extracellular volume (ECV) as an indicator of fibrosis. The study will assess if higher ECV levels correlate with increased risks of AF recurrence, hospitalization, and poor cardiac function recovery. Positive findings could make ECV a key factor in deciding AF treatment strategies.
The goal of this Ambispective cohort Study is to compare in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergo pulse field ablation and radiofrequency ablation, respectively. The main question it aims to answer are:Comparison of the therapeutic effects of pulse field ablation and traditional thermal ablation on patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and postoperative left atrial reverse remodeling.Participants will Perform pulse field ablation or radiofrequency ablation according to different groups, and cooperate to complete outpatient follow-up 6 months after surgery.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heartbeat that can cause symptoms of skipped beats, shortness of breath, stroke, or in some cases fluid in the lungs or legs. Treating AF is mostly to do with slowing the heart rate down so that the heart can get a chance to regain some energy. In some cases, slowing the heart rate is not easy to achieve as some elderly patients find it difficult to tolerate medications and suffer the side effects of such treatments. In those instances, there might be a possibility to permanently control the heart rate by implanting a pacemaker in the heart and intentionally damaging a regulatory region of the heart called the atrioventricular (AV) node. Damaging the AV node by a procedure called ablation results in the AF not being able to influence the bottom chambers (the ventricles) resulting in a slow rhythm. Therefore, if a pacemaker is implanted then the heart rate can be completely regulated by the pacemaker. A complex pacemaker that stimulates both the right and left ventricles simultaneously (BiVP) has been used for the last decade prior to AV node ablation. More recently, a technique has been designed to reduce the number of leads in the heart, reduce procedure time and have a similar effect on the heart called Conduction System Pacing (CSP). However, this has not been directly compared to BiVP in a robust randomized control trial. There is also not enough existing evidence to show that a pace and ablate strategy is superior to optimal medical therapy. We intend to compare the efficacy of BiVP to CSP in patients who undergo AV node ablation for treating AF, in addition to comparing both pace and ablate methods to pharmacological therapy.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder affecting 2-4% of the adult human population. AF is a disturbance in the electrical impulses of the heart - an electrical disturbance commonly originating from the pulmonary veins. Normalization of the heart rhythm with anti-arrhythmic drugs often fail and is frequently associated with side effects. Therefore, a treatment termed ablation by catheters via an inguinal vein has been devised and is increasingly being used for the treatment of AF. The cornerstone of this treatment is electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins so that the nocuous electrical impulses from the pulmonary veins cannot cause a disturbance in the heart rhythm and initiate episodes of AF. This treatment is called pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Recent studies have shown that PVI is better than anti-arrhythmic drug treatment in the prevention of recurrence of AF, but despite substantial improvements in techniques and tools only 60-70% are cured from AF by a single PVI procedure, and in around 80% of patients who require additional catheter ablation, durable isolation of all the pulmonary veins has not been achieved. Improved tools for durable PVI are therefore required. A novel catheter to achieve PVI called the HELIOSTAR™ radiofrequency balloon ablation catheter has shown promising clinical results with a favorable safety profile, but the durability of PVI has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aim to investigate the long-term durability of PVI by the radiofrequency balloon and the clinical outcome following the procedure. In this study, patients with AF referred for catheter ablation will undergo an initial PVI treatment using the radiofrequency balloon catheter. All patients will undergo a repeat electrophysiology (EP) study after 4-6 months to determine to durability of PVI. Patients will be issued with a 48-hour heart rhythm monitor at 3 and 12 months after the initial PVI. Patients-reported effects on quality of life by AF related symptoms will be evaluated using a specialized questionnaire provided approximately every third month throughout the 12 month follow-up.
The objective of the study is to compile real-world data on the use of the VERAFEYE System in standard of care atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures. Results from this study will be used to guide development of the VERAFEYE System.
Antecedents: electrical isolation of pulmonary veins is the standard treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. However, its efficacy is lower in persistent and chronic forms of this arrhythmia compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Many complementary techniques have been proposed, that added to pulmonary veins isolation, may reduce the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation. However, none of them has obtained consistent results. Linear ablation aims to parcellate and modify the left atrial substrate responsible for atrial fibrillation maintenance. Previous studies have offered contradictory results using linear ablation. Methods: SUPAFER is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized clinical trial that compares the efficacy of pulmonary veins isolation alone vs pulmonary vein isolation plus an specific protocol of left atrial linear ablation. Contrary to previous studies, the specific SUPAFER linear ablation is systematic, homogeneous and target atrial areas that have not been systematically ablated in previous trials. The trial aims at demonstrating the superiority of the combined ablative approach during 1-year follow-up. Daily transtelephonic ECG samples a 30 days continuous ECG monitoring are used to maximize de detection of recurrences, even asymptomatic.
In this study we investigate the correlation between RDW and POAF, as we use the RDW as a predictor for inflammation for prediction of POAF