View clinical trials related to Anxiety Disorders.
Filter by:This study investigates the potential of cranial electrotherapy stimulation to mitigate anxiety induced cognitive deficits
Serious burns and other traumatic or disfiguring injuries represent a significant public health burden. Survivors often need intense medical or surgical treatment, including plastic surgery. As well as devastating physical injuries, up to 45% of people develop significant mental health difficulties following a traumatic injury. These difficulties include depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is the most widely offered treatment within the National Health Service (NHS) and the most common treatment provided for burns and plastics patients. However, CBT is limited in efficacy, time-consuming, and focuses on treating the most distressing problem first. One way to overcome these limitations is to evaluate a group therapy that can treat multiple mental health problems at once. One such treatment is called Metacognitive Therapy (MCT; Wells 2009). MCT targets metacognitive beliefs (beliefs people hold about their thinking) rather than the content of patients' thoughts (i.e. reality testing), which is advantageous over cognitive therapies as often following a burns or plastics injury patients experience realistic negative thoughts (e.g. thoughts about disfigurement). MCT has been shown to be more effective at treating anxiety and depression in mental health settings than CBT, however, more research is needed to evaluate MCT in physical health settings. The aim of this study is to examine the acceptability and feasibility of group-MCT within the Department of Burns, Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery at Wythenshawe Hospital. We aim to recruit 20 patients to receive six weekly sessions of group-MCT. Sessions will last approximately 90 minutes. Indicators of feasibility and acceptability will be described including rates of referrals, recruitment, and dropout. Data on symptom outcomes (as measured by the PHQ-9 and GAD-7) at pre and post treatment will be assessed and benchmarked against usual treatment delivered. The data will be used to inform a future large-scale trial on the effectiveness of MCT.
The overall goal of this project is to develop a novel transdiagnostic behavioral treatment -- Amplification of Positivity (AMP) -- intended to enhance positive social connections in individuals with elevated anxiety and/or depression. Social relationship impairments are common and debilitating consequences of anxiety and depression. Existing treatments have some beneficial impact on social functioning; however, many people continue to have few and/or poor quality relationships following treatment, even after experiencing symptom relief. This study will evaluate the effects of AMP on the brain systems that have been shown to be important for establishing positive connections with others. Approximately 100 individuals (ages 18-55) seeking treatment for anxiety or depression will participate in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned with equal probability to either AMP or stress management training (SMT) (6 sessions each). Participants will be assessed at baseline and post-treatment and compared on measures assessing brain responses to social reward (primary outcome), as well as physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to social reward (secondary outcomes). It is hypothesized that the AMP group will experience greater increases from pre- to post-treatment in activity in brain systems that regulate the processing of social reward cues (e.g., striatum) relative to participants in the SMT group. It is also hypothesized that changes in brain activation to social reward from pre- to post-treatment will be correlated with the degree of improvement in social connectedness.
Primary objectives: The primary objective is to ascertain if trigeminal nerve stimulation is an effective treatment with high tolerability for patients with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder.
It has been planned to determine the effect of EFT, which effectiveness has been determined by the studies, on the covid-19 fear and anxiety experienced by the nurses working in the emergency department. The study was designed as a randomized controlled study with pre-test and post-test control group.
The aim of this study is to compare, in cost-effectiveness and cost-utility terms, a brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural therapy in two different modes, individual and group, with the treatment usually administered in primary care (TAU). Participants between 18 and 65 years old and with, according to the pretreatment evaluation, mild to moderate emotional disorders will be randomly allocated to the three clusters. They will be assessed again immediately after treatment and 6 and 12 months later. The study hypotheses expect to find (H1) the individual treatment generally as effective as the group one, whereas (H2) the TAU will be the least effective. (H3) The group therapy is expected to get the best results in terms of cost-effectiveness and (H4) the TAU will get the worst cost-effectiveness results. Furthermore, (H5) it is expected to find these results across the follow-up assessments too.
Depression and anxiety that occur around the time of pregnancy can adversely impact a person's health and well-being, and their child's health and development. Fewer than 20% of affected people are adequately treated, often because of under-use of medications. Measurement based care (MBC) is a model of care where psychiatric symptoms are routinely tracked and reviewed together by a patient and their doctor to better manage symptoms. It has not been systematically evaluated for perinatal depression and anxiety. The overall objective of this study is to test the feasibility of MBC in this population to inform a future large randomized controlled trial for definitive evaluation. In order to avoid known barriers to MBC, electronic MBC (eMBC) will be used. With eMBC, patients can enter their symptoms into their electronic medical records before their appointment so that they can be evaluated by their doctor during the appointment. In this pilot study, the feasibility of recruitment for a future efficacy trial, including feasibility of recruitment, and retention, acceptability and adherence to a trial protocol will be evaluated.
This study was designed as a randomized controlled, pre-test-post-test control group in order to determine the effect of laughter therapy on anxiety, life satisfaction and psychological well-being of nursing students. Laughter therapy was applied to the experimental group for at least 60 minutes, 10 sessions two days a week. For the evaluation, the state-continuity anxiety scale, life satisfaction scale, psychological well-being scale were applied at the pre-application stage (pre-test) and after the laughter therapy sessions (post-test). The following hypotheses were included in this study; H1: Laughter therapy given during the Covid19 pandemic reduces the anxiety level of intern students. H2: Laughter therapy given during the Covid19 pandemic affects the life satisfaction of intern students. H3: During the Covid19 pandemic process, the laughter therapy given to interns affects the relationship between anxiety levels and life satisfaction. H4: Laughter therapy given to intern students during the Covid19 pandemic process affects psychological well-being.
The aim is to evaluate short term and longer term treatment effects of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatment as usual for college students with anxiety and/or depression in low-middle income countries of Latin America.
Treatment of every child with anxiety disorder begins with the question of which treatment to start first. Both fluoxetine and CBT have strong empirical support, but few studies have compared their initial effectiveness head-to-head, and none has investigated what to do if the treatment tried first isn't working well-whether to optimize the treatment already begun or to add the other treatment. Aims of the study: 1. The study will assess whether beginning with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or fluoxetine medication is more effective in improving youth-rated anxiety symptoms over the 24-week intervention 2. If the initial intervention fails to induce clinical remission by week 12, the study will assess whether optimizing the initial treatment modality alone, or adding the other modality to the first, yields better symptom improvement by week 24 3. The study will assess whether one sequence of treatment modalities - i.e., CBT followed by optimized CBT; CBT followed by optimized CBT+ medication; medication followed by optimized medication; medication followed by optimized medication + CBT -- is significantly better or worse than predicted from the two main effects 4. The study will assess the stability of treatment response for ≥12 months following completion of the 24-week trial