View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Local.
Filter by:This is a Phase IIa open, randomised, single and parallel group, therapy controlled, single centre study, which has been divided into 3 sequential phases, which are designed to study respectively, (a) the time taken to achieve surface anaesthesia, (b) the extent of post-operative pain relief and (c) the depth and quality of anaesthesia during a leg ulcer surgical debridement procedure
Title: A prospective randomized double blind trial of the efficacy of a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block on the 24 h morphine consumption after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Objectives: The primary objective is to study the influence of a bilateral erector spinae block on 24h morphine consumption. Endpoint: The primary endpoint is the 24 h morphine consumption in mg. Secondary endpoints are intraoperative sufentanil requirement, total morphine during first 72 postoperative hours, NRS pain scores in rest and defined movement (moving to chair) at regular time intervals and Quality of Recovery 40 score (QoR-40) at fixed time intervals day 1 and 3 postoperatively Population: Patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion ranging 1 - 3 levels Phase 3 Number of sites Enrolling participants: University Hospital Antwerp &AZ KLINA Brasschaat Description of study agent: Bilateral erector spinae block: each block contains 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% + 5 mcg/ml epinephrine Study duration Until the required study population is met Participant duration 72 hours
Background: This study aims to obtain the most favorable syringe and needle combination, which causes the least pain during local anesthesia tumescent injection in the simulation of fully awake hand surgery. Methods: A randomized single-blinded controlled trial is designed for 30 adult male healthy subjects to compare the pain from injection using syringe and needle combination i.e. 1) 1 cc syringe with 26G needle, 2) 3 cc syringe with 26 G needle, and 3) 5 cc needle with 26 G needle. The injection will be performed in any of at the second, third and fourth fingers of either subject's hand randomly. The injection will be SIMPLE block technique using 1 cc of NaCl 0.9% solution under the injection speed of 30 seconds/cc. Subjects are required to rate two check-point of VAS at the timing of needle puncture and just right after the completion of the infiltration. Upon the completion of each finger, the subject is also asked to give response to seri of questions regarding the procedures and their preferences. At the end of all injections, subject is asked to rate his preference of syringe and needle combination.
Intravenous regional anesthesia is a commonly used technique in the outpatient setting for short hand and upper extremity cases, such as carpal tunnel release or trigger finger release. The technique requires a tourniquet, Esmarch bandage, an intravenous line, and lidocaine. It can be performed and learned easily. The technique is safe and easy to perform, and it provides adequate anesthesia for short cases; however, there are still some cases in which adequate anesthesia is not achieved. One of the possible reasons for failure is that the local anesthetic (lidocaine) does not properly exit the veins to reach the interstitial space (where many nerves are located) to provide the nerve block. In this study, the investigators hypothesize that after application of lidocaine to the intravenous system, application of external pressure through the skin will facilitate tissue penetration and improve the block. The only research procedure being done is a re-application of the Esmarch bandage; all other procedures are Standard of Care.
To find out if dexamethasone used as adjuvant to ropivacaine, a long-lasting local anesthetic, prolongs the duration of modified pectoral nerve block in women undergoing breast surgery.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if applying a lidocaine topical solution before wounds treatment decreases the pain of the procedure in comparison with placebo solution.
The investigators aim to compare the quality of pain relief provided by local infiltration analgesia delivered by surgeon and Pecs block delivered by anaesthetist under ultrasound guidance for patients undergoing mastectomy with axillary dissection.
A prospective, randomised, single-masked comparison of local anaesthetic approaches including topical anesthesia combined sub-conjunctival anesthesia(two-step anesthesia) for minimally invasive vitrectomy（TAMIV）vs peribulbar block vs retrobulbar block
Patients who have mandibular deformity and will undergo bilateral sagittal split osteotomy will be included in the study.One side of the osteotomies randomly will be considered as study group and another side as a control group.In the study group , platelet rich fibrin will be placed after osteotomy and before rigid fixation.In the control group, fixation will be done without Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF).Neurosensory disturbance will be evaluated 6 and 12 months after surgeries.
A randomized controlled trial to determine if pre- and post- operative regional pain control (transversus abdominis plane block) with ropivacaine versus placebo leads to lower anesthetic and narcotic dosing, and alters pain scores. This study plans to learn more about regional anesthesia and pain control during abdominal surgery. The study will gather data about the effectiveness of continuous catheter infusion of local anesthetic after an abdominal operation. Outcomes include pain scores, IV pain medicine requirements, and delirium.