View clinical trials related to Acute Pain.
Filter by:Patients experience pain after their knee replacement surgery - and some may continue to experience persistent pain long after their knee replacement surgery. Traditional pain management strategies reply on pain medication such as opioids for pain control. However, these drugs do not work well for pain associated with movement or the the nerve pain (tingling, electrical sensations) after surgery. In addition, opioids are associated with significant side effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, depression, cognitive dysfunction and risk of persistent opioid use. Neuropathic pain medications, such as venlafaxine are effective in managing nerve pain. Recent studies also support its potential role in acute pain management. Here, we propose a prospective randomized clinical trial 1) to evaluate the efficacy of Venlafaxine in reducing pain intensity and opioid consumption at post-operative day 1 (POD1) and 1- week after surgery, and 2) to examine whether the use of Venlafaxine will reduce the incidents of chronic postsurgical pain in TKA patients at 3-month time point.
Given the difficulties encountered with subjective pain assessment tools, one of the ideas for reducing the occurrence of insufficient analgesia administration in the emergency department is to find a tool capable of measuring pain without requiring the patient's participation, and which could be integrated into the systematic measurement of the 4 other vitals. An interesting idea is the measurement of pupillary diameter and its reflex variations by a portable pupillometer. Indeed, the diameter of the pupil (DP) reflects the constant interactions between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems at the level of the iris muscles. Pupillometry measures the change in pupillary diameter and allows the performance of three dynamic tests useful in the assessment of pain.
The goal of the proposed study is to examine the efficacy of using an honest placebo to relieve pain for patients with an acute pain condition. People with acute pain will receive their standard dose of opioid medication for pain management. In addition, some people will be asked to take placebo pills, honestly described as placebos, as well. Patients will answer a few short questions over the phone once per day for seven days about pain and opioid use. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the open label placebo group will take fewer opioids and have less pain than those in the treatment as usual group.
Phase III clinical trial, multicentre of superiority, randomized, double-blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled and use of ibuprofen gel in the treatment of acute pain.
Acute pain is reported in approximately 80% of patients undergoing postoperative care for various types of surgical procedures in the United States. Another study reported patient postoperative pain intensity with 75% with severe pain in the first 1 to 2 postoperative days and 38% reporting moderate to severe pain at 14 postoperative days. Several modalities have been used as the standard for the management of pain postoperative C-sections. One of the postoperative analgesic modalities for SC is quadratus lumborum block (QLB). This technique has advantages in relieving postoperative pain after C-section because it is considered to be able to relieve visceral pain as well as somatic pain. The transmuscular QLB (QLBT) approach is one of the most frequently used. This technique was found to be effective with regard to the distribution of analgesics to the paravertebral spaces which is the hallmark of QLB. However, this technique was found to be difficult to perform. Difficulties were reported related to the position of the procedure i.e. lateral or sitting position.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of magnesium to bupivacaine for the post-operative adductor canal blocks (ACB) can decrease opioid consumption and improve pain management for patients after same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The investigators will assess whether the addition of magnesium will decrease visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, decrease post-operative total opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents), decrease the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and improve patient satisfaction in comparison to when magnesium is not administered.
The study is a multicenter single-blinded randomized comparative trial. Adult patients older than 20 years of age presenting with acute hip fracture in emergency department between January 1st, 2021 and December 31st, 2021 will be enrolled. (NOTE: The study was paused temporarily due to local SARS-2 COVID-19 virus pandemic restrictions. Finally, we conducted the study from August 30th, 2021 to May 08th, 2022.) Included patients will receive analgesia with either pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block or intravenous morphine. The primary outcome measure was pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0 to 10) at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes were rescue opioids use, complications, length of hospital stay, and patient-reported outcomes.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether, during a waiting period in an emergency department, the patient's participation in a modern art therapy session decreases the patient's level of anxiety and pain. As a secondary objective, this study aims to explore whether participation in a modern art therapy session is perceived positively by the patient. This objective will be assessed by both patient self-report and art therapist heteroreport. In this work, the investigators will therefore seek to demonstrate the potential positive impact of modern art therapy conducted during times of waiting for examination or results.
Many patients admitted to the general intensive care unit suffer from pain, whether acute or chronic. Those patients include post-operative patients, multi trauma, acute pancreatitis and patients with multiple rib fractures. Most patients in the intensive care unit, whether intubated and ventilated or not, are treated with systemic analgesic drugs, usually given intravenously, enterally, or trans dermally (fentanyl patches). Continuous epidural anesthesia has been shown in several studies to have an advantage over systemic analgesia in specific conditions, such as pancreatitis, multiple rib fractures and upper abdominal surgeries. Some of its benefits include improved gastrointestinal motility (reduction of ileus rates), decreased thromboembolic events (DVT) and better quality of pain control. In intubated and ventilated patients, continuous epidural anesthesia may reduce the amount of required systemic sedation. Reducing the amount of sedation may contribute to a decrease in delirium rates, shortening the time to extubation and reducing other adverse effects associated with high requirements of sedation drugs (such as a decrease in blood pressure). Most of the studies comparing systemic analgesia to epidural analgesia examined a population of patients hospitalized in the surgical ward, post breast, abdominal or orthopedic surgeries of the pelvis and lower extremities, or due to other conditions such as pancreatitis or multiple rib fractures. There are almost no studies that have examined the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit, including sedated and ventilated patients, compared with systemic analgesia. From 2011 until today, our intensive care unit has admitted about 300 patients who were treated with continuous epidural analgesia. In this study we would like to compare them to another group of patients (about 300 patients as well), who were admitted to the unit for similar etiologies (post-operative, multi- trauma, pancreatitis, etc.), and to observe differences between the groups. We would like to examine differences in mortality within 28 days, as well as differences in morbidity, such as the level of analgesia and delirium rates between groups.
The American Academy of Pain Medicine has labeled pain as a "silent epidemic" due to its staggering costs to society (over $500 billion/year) and widespread prevalence (affects over 100 million Americans). Thus, it is imperative to test and validate cost-effective pain therapies. To this extent, cannabis is characterized as one of the most promising therapies to treat a wide spectrum of pain conditions. However, the clinical applicability of cannabis-based pain therapies has been limited due to lacking mechanistic characterization in human-focused studies. Of critical importance, the neural mechanisms supporting cannabis induced pain relief remain unknown. The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to identify the brain mechanisms supporting the direct alleviation of acutely evoked pain through vaporized cannabis.