View clinical trials related to Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Filter by:Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Every year, millions of people suffer its most adverse manifestation, an acute myocardial infraction (AMI). The majority of these patients present at least one of the standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). These include smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). However, emerging scientific evidence recognizes a clinically significant proportion of patients presenting with life-threatening AMI without any SMuRF (SMuRF-less patients). This proportion of patients with ACS without SMuRF appears to be increasing during the last two decades and has recently been reported as high as 20% (of total AMIs). To date, there are no scientific data capable of highlighting specific risk factors-biomarkers responsible for the development of AMIs SMuRF-less patients. Therefore, two groups of patients with AMI (with SMuRFs vs SMuRF-less) will be compared regarding their clinical, laboratory and imaging (echocardiographic and angiographic) profile, and possible predictive factors leading to SMuRF-less AMI will be evaluated. On the basis of the above, the aim is to prospectively analyze a cohort of well-characterized patients with AMI. The rationale of the study is to investigate potential correlations between metabolic profile of patients and SMuRF-less AMI. This could lead to the development of predictive risk stratification algorithms for patients without SMuRFs and coronary artery disease.
This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to identify whether immediate multi-vessel PCI would be better in clinical outcomes compared with culprit lesion-only PCI for AMI and multi-vessel disease with an advanced form of CS patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).
To investigate the prognostic impacts of the atrial fibrillation burden (AFb) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who developed paroxysmal new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during the index AMI hospitalization.
Several clinical and preclinical studies have focused interest on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], showing a direct and independent relationship of its circulating levels with the progression of atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations. However, to date, Lp(a) represents an underestimated predictor of CV risk, especially in higher-risk populations, such as patients with strong CV familiarity and recurrent and/or early-onset CV events. The key point of the project will be the evaluation of the role of Lp(a) in the development of atherosclerotic disease and, specifically, acute coronary syndrome.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Every year, millions of people suffer its most adverse manifestation, an acute myocardial infraction (AMI). The majority of these patients present at least one of the standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). These include smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). However, emerging scientific evidence recognizes a clinically significant proportion of patients presenting with life-threatening AMI without any SMuRF (SMuRF-less patients). This proportion of patients with ACS without SMuRF appears to be increasing during the last two decades and has recently been reported as high as 20% (of total AMIs). To date, there are no scientific data capable of highlighting specific risk factors-biomarkers responsible for the development of AMIs SMuRF-less patients. Concurrently, metabolomics is rapidly evolving as a novel technique of studying small molecule substrates, intermediates and products of cell metabolism. This technique could be utilized to flag patients with higher risk for increased atherosclerotic burden, and subsequent future adverse clinical events. Besides the already established biomarkers, several metabolomic indicators, such as ceramides (C16, C18 και C24), acylcarnitines, apolipoproteins (ApoΒ and ApoA1) and adiponectin, have been separately shown to increase the risk for coronary artery disease development and progression. Therefore, the two groups of patients (with SMuRFs vs SMuRF-less) will be compared regarding their metabolic fingerprints -specifically the aforementioned novel metabolomic biomarkers- and possible predictive factors leading to SMuRF-less AMI will be evaluated. On the basis of the above, the aim is to prospectively analyze a cohort of well-characterized patients with AMI. The rationale of the study is to investigate potential correlations between metabolic profile of patients and SMuRF-less AMI. This could lead to the development of predictive risk stratification algorithms for patients without SMuRFs and coronary artery disease.
A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo parallel control design was used in this study.60 subjects eligible for inclusion will be randomly assigned to either a low-dose (0.25ug/kg) medium-dose (0.5ug/kg) high-dose (2.0ug/kg) experimental drug group or a control group (placebo) at a ratio of 1:1:1:1.After randomization, subjects received the experimental drug or placebo once a day, intravenously, on day 2 to 7, 12 hours and 4 hours after PCI.Ninety days after PCI were observed.
The incidence of cardiovascular disease is still high in China under the condition of non-standard treatment of Western medicine. Acute coronary plaque rupture and thrombosis is an extreme manifestation of instability of "vulnerable plaque", which is the result of the joint action of multiple factors. The intervention of unstable plaque reversal from multiple factors is inherently reasonable. Compared with the treatment of thrombosis and unstable plaque in western medicine, quick acting Jiuxin Pill can not only calm and relieve pain for pain and other symptoms, but also regulate immune inflammation and metabolic disorder, improve microcirculation and anti myocardial ischemia. In order to evaluate the efficacy, safety and modern scientific basis of Suxiao Jiuxin Pill in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the investigators designed this study.
Glucose monitoring after Acute Myocardial infarct in people with diabetes is a Dexcom funded study that is investigating whether the use of continuous glucose monitors (Dexcom ONE model) in people with type 2 diabetes facilitates time in glycaemic range in the 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction. As an exploratory outcome it will investigate whether time in glycaemic range is associated with changes in mortality and major adverse cardiac events in the 6 months after acute myocardial infarct.
Researchers are looking for a better way to prevent the formation of blood clots in people who have or have had: - an irregular and often rapid heartbeat - a blocked blood flow to the heart - a blocked or reduced blood flow to a part of the brain. When a blood clot forms in the body in patients with the above conditions, it may block vessels of the heart, the brain and/or other parts of the body. This may lead to heart attack, stroke and other serious complications. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. This is a complex series of steps that must occur in a specific sequence. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. They work by interrupting one or more of the coagulation steps and are therefore known as anticoagulants. They decrease the risk of the above-mentioned complications. The study treatment asundexian works by blocking a very specific step in the blood clotting process, the activation of a protein called Factor XIa. Due to its very specific action that is not thought to be involved in the main blood clotting steps needed to stop bleeding (e.g. like from a cut finger), asundexian is expected to reduce the risk of bleeding that is still seen with existing anticoagulants. Since people who need an anticoagulant may also have liver problems, information on asundexian use in this group is needed. The main purpose of this study is to learn how asundexian moves into, through and out of the body in participants with a mild or moderate reduction in liver function compared to participants with normal liver function who are similar in age, weight, and gender. To answer this question, researchers will measure - the average highest level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as Cmax) - the average total level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as AUC). that were reached after intake of a single tablet of asundexian. The researchers will compare these data between participants with reduced liver function and matched participants with normal liver function to look for differences. Each participant will be in the study for up to 4 weeks. Participants will stay in-house for 6 days, starting the day before taking asundexian. In addition, two visits to the study site are planned. During the study, the doctors and their study team will: - do physical examinations - check vital signs - take blood and urine samples - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
For a long time, the right ventricle has been the "forgotten chamber", but with the deepening of people's understanding of the disease, right ventricular dysfunction has become an important factor to evaluate the disease progression and late prognosis of patients with AMI. Right ventricular myocardial strain derived from two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography is a new method for early evaluation of regional and global right ventricular systolic function, and its repeatability is much higher than that of LVEF. Acute inferior myocardial infarction is often caused by occlusion of the proximal middle segment of the right coronary artery. Many studies have confirmed that RVMS is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with AIMI. However, 60% of the right ventricular systolic function is contributed by the left ventricle and interventricular septum, and the left anterior descending branch and the left circumflex branch are the main sources of blood supply to the left ventricle and interventricular septum, so in theory, non-RCA occlusion can also lead to varying degrees of right ventricular dysfunction. However, there are few studies on the role of RVMS in predicting the prognosis of AMI patients caused by non-RCA occlusion. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prospectively study the value of dynamic changes of RVMS in predicting the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction with different infarct-related vessels, in order to provide more clinical reference information for the diagnosis and treatment of AMI.