View clinical trials related to Thromboembolism.
Filter by:MACACOD is a clinical record in the usual clinical practice of direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban). Design: single-center, observational, prospective, uncontrolled study of anticoagulated patients with any direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism to determine the incidence of serious complications (thromboembolic or hemorrhagic) in real life
This study aims to investigate a novel positron emission tomography(PET)-probe for imaging of fresh intravascular blood clots in pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
The HOKUSAI post VTE study contains of two different research questions; one on the long term outcomes of deep vein thrombosis and one on the long term effects of pulmonary embolism, post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) respectively. Our aim of the study is to compare the long term outcomes along with the quality of life assessment of VTE in a group treated with heparin+VKA versus a group treated with heparin+edoxaban in the acute setting.
Participants between the ages of 19 and 70 who were initially diagnosed with venous thromboembolism and were accompanied by dyslipidemia (LDL> = 100 mg / dl) were enrolled. Participants diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, pulmonary embolism CT, and peripheral B-mode ultrasound (B-mode ultrasound) Only participants who do not meet the exclusion criteria should be enrolled in the study. Once the participant is selected, the patient is informed of the study and receives the consent form. Participants who are eligible for all of the criteria and who do not qualify as exclusion criteria should be enrolled in the study and randomly enrolled in a 1: 1 dose of rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily or equivalent. Participants who previously used statins have a wash-out period of two weeks or more Participants undergo a visit at 12 weeks after initiation of treatment. For fasting blood tests, patients visit on an empty stomach. Outpatient follow-up observes side effects after last visit and observes changes in vital signs and weight. After 24 weeks of treatment, the participant visits for efficacy evaluation. We performed body weight, vital signs and blood tests (WBC, hemoglobin, BUN, creatinine, CRP, D-dimer, fibrinogen, PAI-1, AST, ALT, CK, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL and LDL). 1. Primary evaluation item: Improvement of venous insufficiency at 6 months 2. Secondary evaluation items: Improvement of blood lipid concentration, inflammation and blood clotting at 6 months Comparison of numerical rate of change 3. Tertiary evaluation items: recurrence of venous thrombosis
Open and multicenter randomized clinical trial (1:1) comparing limited screening with extended screening with the performance of Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan in the search for neoplasms in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolic disease at high risk of developing cancer at follow-up. Introduction: Cancer screening in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is controversial. In the last years, a score has been developed that selects patients at high risk of developing cancer during follow-up. Objective: To estimate the impact of an active cancer search strategy using 18-fluordesoxiglucose (FDG) PET-CT in unprovoked VTE with high-risk to develop cancer. Specific Objectives: 1) Number of neoplasms diagnosed in the screening process: 2) number of neoplasms diagnosed at an early stage, 3) impact on survival of the strategy; and 4) impact on the quality of life. Cancer will be considered from 30 days up to 12 months after the diagnosis of VTE. Scope: 20 Spanish hospitals. Design: Open-label, multicentre Randomized clinical trial (1: 1) comparing the performance of PET-CT versus limited screening for cancer. Population: Patients older than 18 years with unprovoked VTE at high risk of presenting cancer at follow-up (≥3 points in the score of Jara-Palomares et al., Chest 2017). Follow-up: 12 months after VTE. Sample: The sample size calculated is 650 patients, to obtain a power of 80%, with a level of significance of 5%, and taking into account a 10% loss of follow-up.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a relatively common disease that effects all age groups and carries significant morbidity and mortality. The initial treatment typically involves both short and long term medication, however when this is not enough to adequately control the disease, surgery is often required. The high morbidity and mortality rates are in part due to the increased rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) which have been shown to develop more frequently in IBD patients compared to the general population. Undergoing abdominal surgery has also been shown to independently increase rates of DVT and PE and since the majority of patients with IBD will undergo surgery at least once in their lifetime, the relative increased risk of developing a VTE is very high. The majority of DVT and PE events in the postoperative IBD population will occur after discharge from hospital and therefore carries significant morbidity and mortality risk in a unmonitored setting. Several studies have demonstrated the benefits and safety of twice daily dosing of oral extended VTE prophylaxis agents in orthopedic and cancer postoperative patients following discharge from hospital. There have been no randomized studies which have evaluated the use of extended postoperative VTE prophylaxis in IBD patients. The purpose of this randomized placebo controlled pilot trial will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative VTE prophylaxis in IBD patients following abdominal surgery. If this pilot trial demonstrates efficacy in reducing postoperative DVT and PE rates, safety and feasibility, clinicians will be armed with the knowledge to pursue a larger multicenter randomized trial with the intent of reducing overall morbidity and mortality in this high risk population.
The proposed study will investigate the clinical use of the ISCDX test that may differentiate between diverse stroke etiologies as listed below: Aim 1: Differentiate between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerotic ischemic strokes, when hemorrhagic stroke is ruled out, as defined by TOAST classification of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke. Aim 2: In cases of ischemic strokes of unknown or "cryptogenic" etiology, determine the ability of biomarker blood tests to predict etiology between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerotic.
The implications of the medico-economic impact are essential in the choice of first-line therapists. The economic impact is an important criterion to recommend the privileged use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (AOD) in first intention.
Ongoing registration of patients with venous thromboembolism treated by means of antithrombotic therapy, thrombolisys, open surgery, endovenous desobstruction and stenting.
Epidemiological, observational, non-interventional, multicentric study on patients diagnosed with cancer who develop a venous or arterial thromboembolic episode, symptomatic or incidental, within a month prior to cancer diagnosis or at anytime after such diagnosis