Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Trauma-Specific Treatment

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Patient-Centered Trauma Treatment, i.e., treatment delivered by peers with lived-experience, has the potential to increase access to trauma treatment in underserved communities. This could positively impact the lives of millions of people as 70% of adults in the U.S have experienced a traumatic event and the consequences of trauma are devastating and far reaching, including chronic and comorbid physical and mental health problems. The most known consequences of trauma include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Seeking Safety (SS) is the most effective evidenced-based treatment for co-occurring trauma, PTSD and SUDs. While no specific degree or experience level is required to conduct SS, all the evidence comes from studies using trained clinicians to implement the treatment, including social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists. However, these research findings do not generalize to underserved communities that lack mental health professionals. Innovative approaches to treatment, such as peer-delivered services, are required to meet the demand for care in underserved areas. While the benefits of peer-delivered services have been well-documented in many areas, the value of peers in the provision of trauma-treatment is unknown. A theoretical basis supports the potential for peer-delivered trauma-treatment to be effective in addition to the strong therapist-patient bond, (i.e. therapeutic alliance (TA), which is an important predictor of treatment outcome and a typical result of peer-patient relationships.

Our research question is whether there is a difference between peer-led SS (PL-SS) groups and clinician-led SS (CL-SS) groups in improving the lives of people with trauma, PTSD and SUDs?

The investigators have three specific aims:

1. Determine the effectiveness of PL-SS groups compared to CL-SS groups in decreasing substance use and PTSD symptoms and improving coping skills, overall mental health and physical health. Hypothesis: PL-SS compared to CL-SS groups will be as effective in improving outcomes.

2. Compare levels of TA among PL-SS and CL-SS groups and examine the impact of TA on outcomes.Hypotheses: Levels of TA will be higher and will play more of a role in impacting outcomes in the PL-SS compared to CL-SS groups.

3. Determine if the standard Seeking Safety Instructor Training (SS-IT) is adequate for peers. Hypothesis: Peers will identify topics that will enhance the SS-IT.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02081417
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of New Mexico
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	October 2013
Completion date	June 2017

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05660434` - Using Aromatherapy in Substance Use Disorder	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05338268` - Substance Use and Loneliness	N/A
Completed	`NCT04098614` - Barriers to Substance Use Disorder Recovery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03954184` - E-health Implementation (Iowa)	N/A
Completed	`NCT03590106` - Cardiac Surgery Peer Recovery Support Program	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05118204` - Randomized Trial of Buprenorphine Microdose Inductions During Hospitalization	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT06273228` - Parenting Young Children in Pediatrics	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05327504` - Written Exposure Therapy for Veterans With SUD and PTSD	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03517111` - The Impact of a Parenting Intervention on Latino Youth Health Behaviors	N/A
Completed	`NCT04284813` - Families With Substance Use and Psychosis: A Pilot Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT04401215` - Technologically-Augmented Referrals to Mitigate Addiction Consequences	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06187701` - Co-Active Therapeutic Theatre (Co-ATT) for Dual-Diagnosis Patients	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04296604` - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Neuromodulation of Executive Function Across Neuropsychiatric Populations	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02382042` - Intensive Referral Intervention to Improve Substance Use Disorder Treatment Outcomes Among Rural and Highly Rural Veterans	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01356667` - Drum-Assisted Therapy for Native Americans	N/A
Completed	`NCT01237366` - Study Targeting Affect Regulation	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00708890` - Twelve Step Based Self-help Groups for Substance Related Disorders	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04048850` - Zepatier in Patients With Substance Use
Recruiting	`NCT05976646` - Phase Ib/2a Drug-drug Interaction Study of a Combination of 45mg Dextromethorphan With 105 mg Bupropion	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT06094972` - The Effectiveness of A-CRA in Compulsory Institutional Care for Youth	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.