View clinical trials related to Quality of Recovery.
Filter by:Major spinal surgery causes greater pain in the postoperative 24 hours. Patients with severe pain may have prolonged hospital stays and delay in mobilization. In addition, chronic pain may be seen in these patients due to ineffectively managed acute postoperative pain. Therefore, optimizing acute postoperative analgesia is a priority in patients undergoing major spinal surgery. Recently, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks such as thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been described in spinal surgery. Both blocks clinically seem to be safe and easily performed. The aims of this study are to compare the quality of recovery scores, overall morbidity and postoperative analgesia after major spinal surgery in patients receiving either TLIPB or ESPB.
The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically recently. Obesity is a pro-inflammatory state which leads to chronic low grade inflammation having different systemic effects. This may make obesity an independent risk factor for severe acute postoperative pain. No prospective studies have been conducted to specifically evaluate the quality of recovery after caesarean delivery for women with morbid obesity when compared to non-obese parturients. In addition, while there is biological plausibility to infer worse pain scores in parturients with obesity, the magnitude of this difference is unknown and information guiding adjustments in pain management are lacking.
In Canada, 29.1% of annual births are via cesarean deliveries (CD). The literature shows that almost 24% of CDs are unplanned. Existing evidence suggests that unplanned cesarean delivery, compared to elective cesarean, may be associated with poor maternal recovery, longer postpartum hospital stays and more opioid requirements after surgery. Since the establishment of the Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean protocols, specific care pathways have been implemented with the aim of optimizing recovery after CD and to reduce the costs to the health care system. However, the majority of unplanned cesarean receive the same postoperative anesthetic, obstetric and nursing care as the elective CDs. Looking at the actual information about maternal recovery after unplanned CD, the investigators found that there is a paucity of literature examining this topic utilizing validated, patient-oriented quality of recovery tools. Recently, Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scoring tool (ObsQoR-10), a new patient-focused outcome instrument for postpartum recovery, it has been validated for all types of deliveries, in the inpatient setting. ObsQoR-10 tool aims to measure quantitatively functional recovery at 24 hours postpartum. It includes 10 questions on a 0 to 10 scale, aimed at pain management, the adverse effects of narcotics and the perception of recovery by the patient. The aim of this study is to determine the quality of recovery from unplanned cesarean deliveries compared to planned ones using a validated tool for recovery after cesarean delivery (ObsQoR-10 tool). The investigators hypothesize that quality of recovery as measured by the Obs-QoR10 for unplanned cesarean deliveries will be lower than the planned CDs.
Recovery from surgery is a complex process, depending on the characteristics of the patient, the anesthesia used, and the time required for surgical management. In the context of emergency surgery, the perioperative period is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality, which may lead us to suspect an alteration in the quality of recovery. Different scales to measure the quality of post-operative recovery have been developed. The QoR-40 and QoR-15 questionnaires assess recovery after elective surgery.These scoring tools accurately measure postoperative recovery by addressing key domains: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support and emotional state. Their use is recommended as an endpoint for assessing patient comfort in clinical trials, according to the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative. In addition, monitoring of the QoR-15 is recommended by the American Society for Enhanced Recovery. A recent French translation of the QoR-15 score has been validated for use in scheduled surgery. All of these scores, regardless of the language in which they are translated, have been developed and validated in patients who have undergone scheduled surgery. Until now, no validated scoring tool has been available to assess recovery after emergency surgery, whether traumatological or not.
This is a pharmacokinetic study to determine risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity of ropivacaine when used in erector spinae plane blocks for thoracic surgery. Through serial blood sampling and the use of NONMEM population pharmacokinetic analysis this risk will be determined for the study population and other populations as well. Pain and quality of recovery will also be assessed.The erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first described in 2016 as a novel fascial plane block that provided analgesia for thoracic neuropathic pain. Since then hundreds of articles have been published that have reported use of the ESP block for indications such as rib fractures, breast surgery, abdominal surgery, and even shoulder surgery. It has also been studied in thoracic surgery and clinical experience confirms that patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracic surgery experience satisfactory analgesia with ESP blocks. Because the block location is further from the neuraxis than both epidural and paravertebral blocks, ESP blocks have been suggested as a safer alternative to these older blocks but safety data have not yet been generated. In particular, the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) has not been studied in ESP blocks. While the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine used for thoracic paravertebral blocks have been established, similar studies have yet to be performed for the newer ESP block. Of particular concern for ESP blocks are two factors not present in some other blocks with established safety: 1). significant intercostal spread has been noted in anatomical studies, which could put patients at risk for LAST and 2). some of the proposed dosing regimens involve the intermittent injection of large bolus doses of local anesthetic. While measurement of arterial plasma levels is useful and necessary to study the safety of ropivacaine given in ESP blocks, the measurements alone do not allow for prediction of plasma levels that would occur in populations as a whole. Nonmem is a population pharmacokinetic application that provides estimates of mean parameters and residual variability in pharmacokinetic values across populations and has been shown to generate better estimates than the two-stage approach. Nonmem will be used in this study to predict pharmacokinetics in populations with different characteristics than the one being studied here, which would create generalizable results.
Ciechanowicz et al. developed and validated a postpartum recovery score for women with a caesarean section: the ObsQoR-11. The psychometric validation of the ObsQoR-11 confirms its reliability, its response to change, its acceptability and its feasibility. The use of this score allows the investigators to quantify the quality of the patient's recovery between 0 and 110, by allocating a score from 0 to 10 for each item. ObsQoR-11 has not yet been validated for use in Turkish. Therefore the investigators aimed to psychometrically evaluate the Turkish translated version of the ObsQoR-11 in a Turkish cohort of women.
The quality of recovery scoring tools for the obstetric patient population is limited. In 2019, Ciechanowicz et al. developed and validated a postpartum recovery score; the ObsQoR-11; used following elective and non-elective cesarean delivery. The ObsQoR-11 was modified to the ObsQoR-10 by Sultan et al. and used spontaneous and operative vaginal delivery based on patient feedback. There is currently only a Hebrew version of this recovery score. ObsQoR has not yet been validated for use in Turkish, which is one of the most spoken languages in the World. Therefore the investigators aimed to psychometrically evaluate (assess validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility) the Turkish translated version of the ObsQoR-10 PROM in a Turkish cohort of women.
Previously published studies show that adding intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia can reduce the postoperative pain and length of stay (LOS) in varies types of surgery. A recent meta-analysis showed that the addition of intrathecal morphine at doses below 500µg did not increase the risk of respiratory depression compared with a control group receiving intravenous opioids. Epidural analgesia is uncommonly used for robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures due to the limited surgical trauma. In addition, the risks associated with the epidural itself such as infection and spinal hematoma are thought to outweigh its possible benefits for these procedures. At Linkoping University Hospital a combination of general anesthesia and intrathecal morphine in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and in robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy is now routinely used in order to improve postoperative recovery. However whether this approach is beneficial in other types of robotic-assisted urological procedures is unknown. Therefore the investigators aim to conduct a feasibility study for the use of intrathecal morphine combined with general anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective urologic laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery at Linkoping University Hospital. The investigators will include 30 patients in the study. The specific aims are to investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15), as an outcome tool measuring postoperative well-being in this patient cohort. The investigators will also investigate the feasibility of other outcome measures such as postoperative pain, post-anesthesia care unit LOS, occurrence of pruritus and hospital LOS. For planning of the timeframe of the future interventional study the investigators will use this feasibility study to examine the inclusion rate of study patients.
Postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) could be related to anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This study is exploring early QoR after radical prostatectomy in the two groups of anesthesia. The first group had a light general anesthesia with lumbal epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. The second group had general anesthesia and a continuous postoperative analgesia with tramadol. The postoperative QoR was evaluated 24 hours after surgery.
Until recently, there was no validated scoring tool to assess recovery after childbirth. Ciechanowicz et al. developed and validated a postpartum recovery score for women with a caesarean section (scheduled or unscheduled): the ObsQoR-11. The psychometric validation of the ObsQoR-11 confirms its reliability, its response to change, its acceptability and its feasibility (average filling time of 2 minutes, and the possibility to print the questionnaire on one page). The use of this score allows the investigators to quantify the quality of the patient's recovery between 0 and 110 (0 being a really poor recovery, and 110 a total recovery), by allocating a score from 0 to 10 for each item. Since then, the initial version of ObsQoR-11 has evolved into a smaller version, ObsQoR-10, for which the pain items have been merged. Similarly, by assigning a score from 0 to 10 for each item, the ObsQoR-10 score allows to quantify the quality of the patient's recovery between 0 and 100 (0 being a very poor recovery, and 100 being full recovery). There are currently no translations of this score into another language, but the investigators can easily assume that they will be done in the near future. French remains the fifth most spoken language in the world. The investigators therefore feel it is necessary to validate the translated version of the ObsQoR-10 score.