View clinical trials related to Quality of Recovery.
Filter by:The goal of this study was to compare the incidence of pain and recovery agitation after single-port laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Reduction of postoperative pain by rectus sheath block compared with local anesthesia infiltration and control group - A comparison between rectus sheath block and local anesthesia infiltration and control group on the reduction of agitation during postoperative recovery If there is a comparison group: The researchers will compare the ultrasound-guided rectus sheath group with the local anesthesia infiltration group and the control group to look at postoperative pain indicators and the incidence of waking agitation.
Total knee replacement (TKR) is among the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures, and a six-fold increase in the number of TKR cases world-wide is projected within a decade as the aging of the populations . As the number of the TKR procedures increases, various approaches increasing the satisfaction and comfort of the patient and the surgeon are of interest in order to provide improved pain management, in-hospital stay, and recovery with the development of modern anesthesiology and pain management techniques.This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided high fascia iliaca compartment block(H-FICB) in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy and to compare it with the normal method which is femoral nerve block combined with a sciatic nerve block to choose the better way. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 44 patients, aged 18-65 years, ASA I-III, who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery in our hospital were selected, the patients were divided into Group A and Group B by random number table method, with 22 patients in each group. Group A was subjected to the H-FICB under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia, given 0.375% ropivacaine+0.5ug/kg Dexmedetomidine 30 ml. Group B was subjected to the H-FICB under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia, given 0.375% ropivacaine+1ug/kg Dexmedetomidine 30 ml. The mini-mental State Examination was used to assess all the patients' primary cognitive status one day before surgery. The initial acting time and the degrees of sensory block and motor block were recorded after the nerve block was completed. Perioperative variables were recorded to be compared. The investigators used the visual analog scale to assess patients' pain degree with postoperative, recorded the occurrence of adverse events such as postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV), delayed emergence from anesthesia, and respiratory depression. The confusion assessment method was used to assess whether patients experienced delirium.
This study was designated to investigate the quality of recovery after transurethral bladder resection. Because, patients undergoing transurethral bladder resection are mostly old age, and because of catheter-related bladder discomfort are common after transurethral bladder resection, study on the quality of recovery after transurethral bladder resection seems to be meaningful. In general, sevoflurane is commonly used as an anesthetic agent for general anesthesia of transurethral bladder resection. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether remimazolam is not inferior to sevoflurnane in terms of quality of recovery after transurethral bladder resection.
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with rapid onset of effects, short maintenance and faster recovery time. Due to its recent development, few studies have investigated the effect of remimazolam on postoperative recovery mainly focusing on physiologic endpoints, recovery time and possible adverse events. Although these parameters are crucial and need evaluation, the investigators ignore quality of recovery from participant's perspective. For this purpose, various measurment tools have been developed for psychometric evaluation of QoR score.
The question remains whether the patients in whom USG-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are applied have a better recovery score than subarachnoid morphine administration, which is considered the gold standard. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of recovery score using the Obstetric Recovery Quality Score-ObsQoR-10 questionnaire experienced by the patients who underwent elective cesarean section and compare the results of different regional anesthesia techniques with subarachnoid morphine.
Major spinal surgery causes greater pain in the postoperative 24 hours. Patients with severe pain may have prolonged hospital stays and delay in mobilization. In addition, chronic pain may be seen in these patients due to ineffectively managed acute postoperative pain. Therefore, optimizing acute postoperative analgesia is a priority in patients undergoing major spinal surgery. Recently, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks such as thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been described in spinal surgery. Both blocks clinically seem to be safe and easily performed. The aims of this study are to compare the quality of recovery scores, overall morbidity and postoperative analgesia after major spinal surgery in patients receiving either TLIPB or ESPB.
The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically recently. Obesity is a pro-inflammatory state which leads to chronic low grade inflammation having different systemic effects. This may make obesity an independent risk factor for severe acute postoperative pain. No prospective studies have been conducted to specifically evaluate the quality of recovery after caesarean delivery for women with morbid obesity when compared to non-obese parturients. In addition, while there is biological plausibility to infer worse pain scores in parturients with obesity, the magnitude of this difference is unknown and information guiding adjustments in pain management are lacking.
In Canada, 29.1% of annual births are via cesarean deliveries (CD). The literature shows that almost 24% of CDs are unplanned. Existing evidence suggests that unplanned cesarean delivery, compared to elective cesarean, may be associated with poor maternal recovery, longer postpartum hospital stays and more opioid requirements after surgery. Since the establishment of the Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean protocols, specific care pathways have been implemented with the aim of optimizing recovery after CD and to reduce the costs to the health care system. However, the majority of unplanned cesarean receive the same postoperative anesthetic, obstetric and nursing care as the elective CDs. Looking at the actual information about maternal recovery after unplanned CD, the investigators found that there is a paucity of literature examining this topic utilizing validated, patient-oriented quality of recovery tools. Recently, Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scoring tool (ObsQoR-10), a new patient-focused outcome instrument for postpartum recovery, it has been validated for all types of deliveries, in the inpatient setting. ObsQoR-10 tool aims to measure quantitatively functional recovery at 24 hours postpartum. It includes 10 questions on a 0 to 10 scale, aimed at pain management, the adverse effects of narcotics and the perception of recovery by the patient. The aim of this study is to determine the quality of recovery from unplanned cesarean deliveries compared to planned ones using a validated tool for recovery after cesarean delivery (ObsQoR-10 tool). The investigators hypothesize that quality of recovery as measured by the Obs-QoR10 for unplanned cesarean deliveries will be lower than the planned CDs.
Ciechanowicz et al. developed and validated a postpartum recovery score for women with a caesarean section: the ObsQoR-11. The psychometric validation of the ObsQoR-11 confirms its reliability, its response to change, its acceptability and its feasibility. The use of this score allows the investigators to quantify the quality of the patient's recovery between 0 and 110, by allocating a score from 0 to 10 for each item. ObsQoR-11 has not yet been validated for use in Turkish. Therefore the investigators aimed to psychometrically evaluate the Turkish translated version of the ObsQoR-11 in a Turkish cohort of women.
The quality of recovery scoring tools for the obstetric patient population is limited. In 2019, Ciechanowicz et al. developed and validated a postpartum recovery score; the ObsQoR-11; used following elective and non-elective cesarean delivery. The ObsQoR-11 was modified to the ObsQoR-10 by Sultan et al. and used spontaneous and operative vaginal delivery based on patient feedback. There is currently only a Hebrew version of this recovery score. ObsQoR has not yet been validated for use in Turkish, which is one of the most spoken languages in the World. Therefore the investigators aimed to psychometrically evaluate (assess validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility) the Turkish translated version of the ObsQoR-10 PROM in a Turkish cohort of women.