View clinical trials related to Periodontal Diseases.
Filter by:Porphyromonas gingivalis is one of the major bacteria involved in the formation and progression of chronic periodontitis. Pathogens invading the gingiva face the host's innate immune system at first and later on the acquired immune system which includes secreted antibodies and specialized cells. Although both the arms of the immune system are coordinated to overcome the infection, there are several known mechanisms which help pathogens as Porphyromonas gingivalis evade immunity. As a result, inflammatory mediators secreted by immune cells cause tissue damage and lead the inflammation process towards chronicity instead of clearing the pathogen. Up till recently most of the studies focused on the role of macrophages, dendritic cells and lymphocytes at the response to periodontal pathogenic bacteria while the role of fibroblasts (the most abundant cell in the connective tissue) was less examined. Fibroblasts are spindle shaped cells which have the ability to produce extra cellular matrix and respond to growth factors and cytokines. They are able to affect cells in the infected tissue and contribute to immune response efficiency. As known in the case of lymphocytes, fibroblasts also vary in subtypes, each differs in phenotype, immune interactions, extra cellular matrix production and destruction, migration abilities and so on. Two main fibroblasts subtypes in the oral cavity originate in the gingival tissue and the periodontal ligament anchoring teeth to the surrounding alveolar bone. Amongst the differences between the two are collagen production ability and receptors profile over the cell surface. Considering all that, the investigators aim to obtain and use periodontal ligament and gingival tissues removed anyways during common dental procedures in order to extract the different fibroblasts subtypes residing there and compare their response to Porphyromonas gingivalis.
The objective of this study is to evaluate Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) as adjunct on non surgical periodontal therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 40 individuals will be selected and divided in two groups. On the treatment stage, the control group (Group C) will receive standard non surgical periodontal treatment. The Test Group (Group T) will be treated with PDT as an adjunct to non surgical periodontal treatment. The treatment will be repeated 4 times in two weeks, followed by dental prophylaxis every 15 days until accomplish 3 months. The follow-up will be done for 6 months. The clinical parameters measured will be: plaque index, pocket depth, bleeding on probing, relative clinical insertion level and suppuration. In addition, the evaluation of crevicular fluid volume and the levels of IL-1, TNF-α, subgingival microbiota by the hybridization DNA-DNA Checkerboard technique. The investigators expect to find identical or better results for the test group.
To establish Oraqix is safe when used on adolescent volunteers.
This study is one component of a program to improve the maintenance of good dental health and the prevention of disease by use of risk stratification methods to efficiently guide increased preventive services to adult dental patients who are at increased risk for the major dental diseases, caries and adult periodontitis. The investigators will use a retrospective cohort model to analyze a large dental claims database to determine if the frequency of preventive services influenced the periodontal disease outcomes and to determine if periodontal risk assessment information can be used to stratify dental patients into "high risk" and "low risk" categories that influence the effect of preventive services on periodontitis outcomes. Primary Objective To evaluate whether dental patients who are classified as "low risk" for periodontal disease progression, based on history of periodontitis (claims history), smoking, diabetes, and IL-1 genetic variations, have different primary and secondary endpoints if they had two dental cleanings per year compared to one cleaning per year. Secondary Objectives To evaluate whether dental patients who are classified as "high risk" for periodontal disease progression, based on a history of periodontitis, smoking, diabetes, and IL-1 genetic variations, have different primary and secondary endpoints if they had two dental cleanings per year compared to one cleaning per year. To evaluate whether dental patients who have had one dental cleaning per year have different primary and secondary endpoints if they are classified as "low risk" for periodontal disease compared to patients who are classified as "high risk." To evaluate whether dental patients who have had two dental cleaning per year have different primary and secondary endpoints if they are classified as "low risk" for periodontal disease compared to patients who are classified as "high risk."
Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the effect of a single session supragingival scaling in a group of pregnant women with periodontal disease with a group that received supra and subgingival scaling. Methods: The investigators included 34 pregnant women between 15 and 43 who had at least 4 teeth with probing depth ≥ 4 mm or clinical attachment loss ≥ 3 mm, with bleeding on probing in the same place. Women were divided into two groups, the group 1 received supra and subgingival scaling associated with oral hygiene orientation (OHO) and the group 2 received only supragingival scaling with OHO too.
Peri-implantitis is an infectious disease that resides in the mucosa surrounding dental implants and also affects the supporting bone. Because the number of implants placed in everyday clinical practice is continuously increasing, it is reasonable to anticipate an increasing prevalence of peri-implantitis. However, from the literature there is very little reliable evidence suggesting which could be the most effective interventions for treating peri-implantitis. The primary objective of this controlled clinical study is to evaluate the microbiological effect of decontamination of the implant surface during the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using a chlorhexidine or placebo solution. The secondary objectives are to assess both the clinical and the microbiological effectiveness of treatment of peri-implantitis. It is hypothesized that rinsing of the implant surface using a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution does not lead to better microbiological and clinical results compared to rinsing with a placebo solution. The present study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Adult patients with at least one endosseous implant in the oral cavity with clinical and radiographical signs of peri-implantitis will be included in this study. Implants with peri-implantitis lesions will be surgically exposed, followed by mechanical cleansing using curettes and gauzes and cotton pellets soaked in saline followed by either 1 minute of rinsing with a placebo solution (saline with appearance of chlorhexidine) (control group) or 1 minute of chemical cleansing using 0,12% chlorhexidine + cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) without alcohol (Perio-aid®) (test group). After 1 minute of saline rinsing the gingival flap will be returned slightly apical (in order to reduce pockets) and will be firmly sutured. For both groups the surgery is followed by 2 weeks of mouthrinses with 0,12% chlorhexidine + Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) without alcohol (Perio-aid®) two times daily during 30 seconds. The main study parameter is the microbial composition of the biofilm on the dental implant surface. Secondary study parameters are bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, suppuration on probing, microbiological composition of the peri-implant sulcus, radiographic marginal bone level on standardized intraoral radiographs, presence of plaque, presence of calculus, marginal soft tissue recession implant failure, complications and adverse events.
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of YH14642 in Korea patients with chronic periodontitis, in order to investigate the recommended therapeutic dose.
The primary purpose of the study will be to look for biological biomarkers to determine which people with gum disease will have a worsening of the disease. A second objective of this study will be to look at the effects of periodontal treatment on the levels of the biomarkers that are identified.
Periodontal instrumentation aims to remove plaque and calculus from the root surface. Both manual and ultrasonic instruments have been used for such decontamination; however, establishing a healthy periodontium can result in adverse effects, such as dentin hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hand or ultrasonic instrumentation on dentin hypersensitivity in patients undergoing non-surgical periodontal treatment. For this controlled clinical trial of a "split mouth" design, 14 patients were selected with homologous teeth in the incisor to premolar region and probing depth ≥ 5 mm on the buccal aspect of the teeth. One side (control) was instrumented with hand instruments and the other side (test) with ultrasonic instruments. Dentin hypersensitivity was assessed in the baseline and during the follow 4 weeks after treatment, with a periodontal probe scratching the root surface and with an air jet. The patient's response was detected by a visual analog scale (VAS) of 10 cm.
There is a gap in knowledge regarding the effects of Vitamin D supplementation on periodontal status in pregnant wome. The investigators aim to evaluate the potential benefit, if any of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on periodontal disease and relevant outcomes including burden of infections and prematurity rates. the investigators hypothesize that 1. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy improves the periodontal health. 2. There is an association between inflammatory biomarkers and periodontal health of pregnant females. 3. Vitamin D supplementation improves the outcomes of pregnancy such as prematurity rates and birth weight