View clinical trials related to Other.
Filter by:The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.
1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of thoracoscopic pleural lavage and pleural brushing in cases of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion.
Background: A type of drug called monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitors are often used in cancer treatment. These drugs help the body s immune system fight cancer by blocking proteins that cause cancer cells to grow. One of these drugs (atezolizumab) is approved to treat certain cancers. Researchers want to find out if lower doses of this drug might provide the same benefit with fewer adverse effects. Objective: To test different doses and timing of atezolizumab for people with cancer. Eligibility: People aged 18 years and older with cancer that has spread locally or to other organs. They must be eligible for treatment with the study drug. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have blood tests and imaging scans. They will provide a sample of tissue from their tumor. Atezolizumab is administered through a tube attached to a needle inserted into a vein in the arm. Participants will take this drug alone or combined with other drugs prescribed for their care. The first 2 treatments will be done per the FDA recommended dose and schedule. Before administering the second dose of the study drug, researchers will check the level of the drug in the participant s blood. Depending on those results, their 3rd dose will be scheduled 2 to 6 weeks later. For the 3rd dose of the study drug, participants will switch to the FDA minimum dosage. Dosages of any other drugs will not change. Researchers will continue to test the levels of the drug in participants blood before each treatment for 16 weeks. After that, these levels will be tested every 3 months. Study treatment may last up to 2 years.
The clinical trial is intended to assess for clinical evidence of Clemastine Fumarate as a myelin repair therapy in patients with acute inflammatory injury-causing demyelination as measured by multi-parametric MRI assessments. No reparative therapies exist for the treatment of acute demyelinating lesions. Clemastine fumarate was identified along with a series of other antimuscarinic medications as a potential remyelinating agent using the micropillar screen (BIMA) developed at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Following in vivo validation, an FDA IND exemption was granted to investigate clemastine for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in the context of chronic optic neuropathy. That pilot study was recently completed and is the first randomized control trial documenting efficacy for a putative remyelinating agent for the treatment of MS. The preselected primary efficacy endpoint (visual evoked potential) was met and a strong trend to benefit was seen for the principal secondary endpoint assessing function (low contrast visual acuity). That trial number was 13-11577. This study seeks to follow up on that study and examine clemastine fumarate's protective and reparative effects in the context of acute demyelinating brain lesions as imaged by multi-parametric MRI assessments. The investigators will be assessing the effects of clemastine fumarate as a remyelinating therapy and assessing its effect on MRI metrics of lesions found in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute inflammatory injury-causing demyelination. In addition to using conventional multi-parametric MRI assessments, this study will also evaluate a new MRI technique called Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) MRI to assess the effects of clemastine fumarate as a remyelinating therapy of acute lesions found in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute inflammatory injury-causing demyelination and compare it to the other assessments.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if a bariatric surgery strategy will improve clinical endpoints, cardiac parameters and functional status in patients with obesity (with BMI 32-40 kg/m2) and symptomatic HF with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF in combination with AF, as compared to standard of care. Patients will be randomized to either the Intervention group receiving bariatric surgery including an intensive pre- and postoperative treatment scheme or to the control group receiving standard of care.
This study targets adult patients treated with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at emergency department (ED) of Severance hospital, Yonsei university. Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure presenting to the ED receive conventional oxygen therapy as initial treatment unless immediate endotracheal intubation is required. Partial rebreathing oxygen masks are mainly applied at first. If the patient's condition does not improve despite such treatment, the patient receives HFNC or endotracheal intubation. However, possible treatment range have not been studied, especially in ED. Decisions are made based on the personal experience of the medical staff in charge. Applying HFNC to patients who eventually fail can lead to delayed intubation and increased mortality. Failure prediction models such as ROX index and HACOR score have been developed due to such reasons. However, such models are mostly based on intensive care unit studies and after application of HFNC. Therefore, failure prediction model at the time before application of HFNC and efficacy of existing models in ED are necessary. This study is a prospective observational study and follows the standard treatment guidelines applied to the patient and the judgment of the attending physician during the patient's treatment process. Immediately before applying HFNC, the patient's respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, SpO₂, PaO₂, PaCO₂, GCS score are determined, and FiO₂ is measured above upper lips using oxygen analyzer(MaxO2+AE, Maxtec, USA). From these data, ROX index (SF ratio/respiratory rate), ROX-HR (ROX index/pulse rate), POX index (PF ratio/respiratory rate), POX-HR (POX index/pulse rate), and HACOR score (Heart Rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, Respiratory rate) are calculated. The settings (flow rate, FiO₂, temperature) at the time of HFNC application are also measured. The same indices and HFNC settings are checked 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours after applying HFNC. Modified Borg score and comfort scale using 5-point Likert scale are additionally determined at 30 minutes for patient's comfort. Primary outcome is HFNC failure at 28 days, defined by endotracheal intubation. Other outcomes include intubation in ED and mortality at 28 and 90 days collected through phone interview. The receiver operating curve for ROX index, HACOR score, ROX-HR, and POX-HR at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours are drawn for the outcomes. The area under the curve of the above indices are compared and cutoff values are chosen with maximum value of index J by the Youden's Index. A binary variable is created based on the cutoff values and multivariable logistic regression analyses are performed. Cutoff values for maximum specificity are also invested suggesting the lower limit of the indicator to which HFNC can be applied.
The aim of our study to compare the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy and motor learning techniques in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. and help the adults to address and revise cognitive distortions and habits affecting your productivity and emotional mindset.participant allocated to control group will be asked to perform cognitive behavioural therapy and participants allocated to experimental group will be asked to perform motor learning activities and cognitive behavioral therapy.
The present experimental study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of isoinertial strength training of the hamstrings using machines in patients with ACL-R during the intermediate post-intervention phases.
The goal of this pre-post design clinical trial is to develop a digital, theory-based Pursed Lip Breathing intervention protocol software system installed on smartphones (DT-PLB) and to preliminarily evaluate its feasibility and effects in stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The main objectives are: 1. To develop a digital, theory-based Pursed Lip Breathing intervention protocol software system installed on smartphones for managing breathing exercises in stable COPD patients. 2. To pilot the methodological procedures of the pre-post study. 3. To determine the recruitment rate, retention rate, attrition rate, and software usage compliance during the subject recruitment and follow-up process of the pre-post study. 4. To evaluate the perception and satisfaction of COPD patients using the DT-PLB. 5. To preliminarily examine the effects of using the DT-PLB intervention on COPD patients, including the six-minute walking test, FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC, mMRC scale, COPD assessment test scale, and health points. 6. To identify any potential adverse events associated with the implementation of DT-PLB. Participants will perform the following tasks during the intervention: 1. Register a personal account on the DT-PLB software. 2. Acquire knowledge and skills related to Pursed Lip Breathing by watching instructional videos. 3. Practice Pursed Lip Breathing for 10 minutes per session, three times daily for eight weeks, as per reminders and guidance provided by the software. 4. Earn health points by completing specific actions as instructed. 5. Optionally post individual texts on the peer forum for peer support within the DT-PLB software. 6. Complete two outcome assessments as scheduled.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about treatment with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. The two main question[s]it aims to answer are: - Is the FFP treatment safe? - Does the FFP treatment impact the 24-hour, 3-month and 6-month outcomes, intensive-care free days, mortality, and hospital brain and physical function at discharge. Patients with moderate to severe TBI will randomly receive either: - Standard of care treatment - Standard of care treatment + 2 units of FFP. Researchers will compare participants receiving standard of care treatment to those receiving experimental fresh frozen plasma (FFP) treatment to see if the FFP is safe and beneficial to participant outcomes.