Clinical Trials Logo

Osteoporosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osteoporosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00177411 Withdrawn - Osteoporosis Clinical Trials

"PTHrP(1-36) IV Dose Escalation Study"

Start date: July 2005
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is a single-blinded, one-treatment, combination dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study done in healthy volunteers. The investigators want to determine whether Parathyroid Hormone related Protein (1-36) [PTHrP(1-36)] shares anabolic properties with the only currently approved anabolic agent, parathyroid hormone(1-34) [PTH(1-34)], which stimulates both osteoblastic bone resorption and formation. In a previous study done by the investigators, postmenopausal osteoporotic women on estrogen received 6.56 mcg/kg PTHrP(1-36) subcutaneously for three months daily. They experiences a 4.7% increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine when compared with those taking placebo. They also displayed an increase in serum osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation, with no change in several markers of bone resorption. It is believed that the rapid absorption and clearance of PTHrP(1-36) likely plays a central role in its anabolic effect In order to further assess absorption, we are combining both pharmacokinetic and dose escalation methods for studying intravenous PTHrP given via a one-time bolus injection. The purpose is to define the maximum safe dose and measure the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single intravenous dose of Parathyroid Hormone-related Protein (1-36)[PTHrP(1-36)]. The results will be useful in determining future treatment options for osteoporosis.

NCT ID: NCT00173693 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Osteoporosis or Osteopenia

What is the Best Policy to Prevent Osteoporotic Fracture?

Start date: January 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) among the programs for preventing osteoporotic fracture. The main comparison will be made among the effects of three programs for preventing osteoporotic fractures: 1. health education; 2. exercise intervention for enhancing bone mineral density (BMD); 3. exercise intervention for preventing falls. The "cost" will be measured bases on the monetary cost of implementation of each program. The "effectiveness" will be measured includes the number of prevented osteoporotic fractures of each program, and related outcomes are the follows: 1. the medical cost of osteoporotic fracture; 2. the change of BMD in consecutive years; 3. the quality of life (QOL) of patients with osteoporotic fracture as compared to the reference population.