View clinical trials related to Osteoporosis.
Filter by:This study is a non-interventional observational study. On the baseline (Visit 1), we collect demographic data from all participating subjects according to their daily medical conditions, prescribe drugs and collect validity and safety data according to the research plan in Visit 1 and Visit 2. In addition, we collect data by application on subject's self-awareness symptoms and subject's questionnaire for medical outcome short form health survey (SF-36) every day from the baseline for 4 days.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to determine the effects of a mindful exercise program on physical (back pain and balance) and psychological (mindfulness, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression) consequences of primary osteoporosis in older patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What are the levels of pain, balance, mindfulness, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression in older patients with primary osteoporosis? - Are there differences in pain, balance, mindfulness, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression according to sociodemographic-clinical characteristics of the patients? - Are there differences in pain, balance, mindfulness, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression between the intervention (mindful exercise) and control (usual care) groups of older patients with primary osteoporosis? 128 participants who meet the criteria will be recruited from the pain department of a Tertiary A level provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine hospital in Mainland China, and randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group. All patients in both groups will receive usual care, including routine medicine and nursing care. The study will last for 12 weeks (one-week training in hospital and 11-week on-line sessions at home) and 4-week follow up. Patients in the intervention group will receive a group-based mindful exercise which will be conducted 5 times per week, 30 minutes per session, and co-led by a mindfulness-trained main researcher and a professional exercise specialist for the first week (week 1) hospitalization. When they discharge, on-line sessions (week 2-12) will be conducted by the main researcher from Monday to Friday. Patients and primary caregivers will be taught how to use 'Tencent meet' software. Upon discharge, a WeChat group will be set up to notify the exercise time and send the links for the online sessions. Those in the control group will received routine medicine and nursing care as usual, and only be taught on the hospital-recommended movements (physical stretching) and encouraged to do it at home on their own. All the variables (pain, mindfulness, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression) and the TUG test (balance) will be measured at the following time point: baseline (Time 1), week 4 (Time 2), week 8 (Time 3), week 12 (Time 4, immediately post-intervention) and week 16 (Time 5, 4 weeks after the intervention) for the two groups of patients. The study will obtain ethical clearance from the study setting, as well as written consent from the participants. Descriptive statistics will be computed for all variables. Normality and homogeneity of the variances will be tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. The data will be analyzed using mixed-model analysis of variance to test the main and interaction effects of group (independent factor) and time (repeated-measures factor) on the dependent variables. The findings of the study would certainly have implications for the treatment of older patients with primary osteoporosis, especially non-pharmacological treatment.
The trial is designed to evaluate prevalence of fragility fracture, their impact on quality of life of SLE patients and disease or treatment variables such as steroids dosage or use of specific drugs like hydroxychloroquine, DMARDs or belimumab. Patients will perform DXA evaluation, blood tests and PROs questionnaires. Moreover, the investigators want to correlate those variables to bone turnover markers and bone metabolism modulators. A secondary aim is also to assess the fracture risk of those patients as described by FRAX and DEFRA tools.
A 24-month prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, multinational, non-inferiority pragmatic clinical trial evaluating zoledronate single or double infusion versus oral alendronate following denosumab
Post-menopausal osteoporosis and the resulting fractures are an important cause of disability and loss of independence. They also increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Given potential side effects, hormone replacement therapy is no longer recommended for menopausal women with risk of becoming osteoporotic. The very significant decrease in the use of these treatments is suspected of contributing to a resurgence in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures, particularly in women before the age of 70. There is a need for prevention of osteoporosis.
Sixty-eight postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis aged between 50 and 60 years were randomly allocated to one of two equal sets. The drug treatment group received calcium and vitamin D3 supplement daily for 12 weeks. While the drug/laser acupuncture group received laser acupuncture therapy for 20 minutes per session 3 times weekly, in addition to the same calcium and vitamin D3 supplement.
The PARABONE study aims to investigate the interaction between bone and parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). The study consists of a clinical part aimed at evaluating a series of circulating molecules of bone derivation (osteocalcin, molecules of the WNT pathway, RANKL, osteoprotegerin, Scelrostin, FGF23) in patients with HPT. In particular, the study has as its primary objective to identify the correlation between circulating levels of PTH and levels of GlaOC and GluOC in patients with HPT.
Osteoporosis is a bone disease that can result in fractures, disability and an increased risk of premature death. Exercise is recommended for fall and fracture prevention, but health care professionals often recommend walking or lower intensity community exercise classes, which may not be effective for building bone. Further, individuals with osteoporosis are often told to avoid lifting or moving in certain ways, which creates fear and activity avoidance. Conversely, research suggests that to stimulate bone, you need higher loads on bone, with either higher intensity resistance training or impact exercise - the types of things people with low bone mass are told to avoid. Our study will examine different types of exercise intensity and how they translate to building bone in people with low bone mineral density (BMD).
The high annual incidence of osteporosis and its high prevalence , means that more and more resources are being devoted to its diagnosis, prevention and treatment in primary care. This pathology is defined as a skeletal disorder characterized by an alteration in bone strength, mainly reflecting a poor integration of bone density and quality. The reduction of the mass and the alteration of the microstructure of osteoporotic bone lead to an increase in its fragility and an increase in the risk of suffering bone fractures. If we add to this the alterations in balance observed in older people, the possibility of fracture and increased fragility increases. It is estimated that every 3 seconds there is an osteoporotic fracture and it is considered that every year 8.9 million fractures of this type occur worldwide. Fragility fractures are estimated to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the case of hip fracture as a consequence of osteoporosis, only 30-45% of surviving cases recover pre-fracture functional status and 32-80% suffer some form of significant dysfunction, thus representing a high economic and social cost. Associated with osteoporosis, numerous studies have also observed a decrease in strength and/or muscle mass (sarcopenia), thus increasing the fragility and deterioration of the patient suffering from osteoporosis. Tokeshi et al. observed that patients with osteoporotic fractures had less muscle mass compared to patients without osteoporosis. Hoo Lee and Sik Gong describe that lower extremity muscle mass and loss of grip are closely related to the occurrence of an osteoporotic vertebral fracture and numerous investigations show the relationship between grip strength and osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. For the diagnosis of osteoporosis, double beam X-ray densitometry (DEXA) is used and osteoporosis is considered to be present when the osteoporosis values are below 2.5 standard deviations (SD) of the peak bone mass, the maximum value reached in young women. At the therapeutic level, pharmacology is the treatment recommended in clinical practice guidelines. However, due to poor adherence and adverse effects, the recommendation of physical activity programs is becoming more and more popular to increase mineral density and bone quality, either as adjuvant treatments or as the treatment of choice. Various research and clinical guidelines recommend the use of therapeutic exercise as part of the treatment of osteoporosis. The National Osteoporosis Foundation of the United States concludes that the practice of exercise improves, among other benefits, the quality of bone mass. Likewise, different systematic reviews have shown that multicomponent training in older people is effective in preventing or maintaining bone mass, especially when such exercises are performed with high load or high impact or when performed by postmenopausal women. Along these lines, the American College of Sports Medicine and recent research demonstrates how strength work at moderate to high load intensity can not only stimulate bone metabolism, but also improve the quality of life of those who practice it. But in spite of the bone benefit observed with high loads for bone tissue, not all elderly people can do it, either because of the fragility that many of them present, or because of the mechanical stress that this type of exercise produces in their joints. For this reason, one of the possible alternatives that we have found for some decades is training through the use of global vibration (GV) or body vibration through the use of vibrating platforms. This type of vibration generally starts in the extremities and the limbs themselves are used as a sounding board for the vibrational stimulus to the rest of the body. This type of equipment has allowed a less demanding training from the articular point of view in a less demanding approach to other exercise programs in patients and has shown significant improvements in bone formation rate, bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular structural and cortical thickness in osteporotic bone tissue. But despite the wide use of vibrating platforms for training in elderly people, it is not free of contraindications such as patients with recent fracture, deep vein thrombosis, osteosynthesis of lower limbs, hip prosthesis, aortic aneurysm or diabetic foot injury, for this reason have emerged focal vibration devices (VF). This tool allows the application of the vibratory stimulus in a specific and repeated way in a part of the body; as well as the control of the amplitude that reaches a certain tissue avoiding the disadvantages of the vibratory platforms in which the region and the tissue to be treated cannot be selected.
Hemophilia is associated with osteoporosis and increased prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD). Many clinical risk factors have been reported, such as hemophilic arthropathy, reduced physical activity, decreased sun exposure, hepatitis C virus infections, vitamin D deficiency, and low body mass index (BMI). There is no data on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and low BMD in hemophilia patients in Taiwan or Asia. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported the prevalence of sarcopenia and correlation with osteoporosis in hemophilia adult patients. The purpose of this study will evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, low BMD, sarcopenia and body composition in a cohort of patients with hemophilia in Taiwan.