View clinical trials related to Opioid-Related Disorders.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to understand the role of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in reducing opioid and other substance use and craving and improving thinking skills.
Effective control of chronic pain is a top priority in the United States, as approximately 10% of adults have severe chronic pain most of which is chronic lower back pain (CLBP). However, despite the advances in neuroscience over the past 20 years, chronic pain is largely treated with opiate narcotics, much as was done in the Civil War. In addition to their high abuse liability and dependence potential, only 30 40% of chronic pain patients declare they receive satisfactory (>50%) relief from their pain through pharmacological treatment. In these patients a common clinical practice is to escalate the dose of opiates as tolerance develops which unfortunately has contributed to escalation in opiate overdose deaths, a resurgence of intravenous heroin use, and $55 billion in societal costs. Consequently, there is a critical need for new treatments that can treat pain and reduce reliance on opiates in individuals with chronic pain. The proposed study will be the first to employ a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design to parametrically evaluate the longitudinal effects of 16 days of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the primary motor cortex (MC) or the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) on self-reported pain and the brain s response to pain. This will be done in a cohort of patients recruited from the community as well as Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH) clinics with chronic lower back pain that have not been able to find adequate pain relief, whether or not they are using prescription opiates for 3 or more months. Participants will be randomized to receive rTMS to the MC, MPFC, or sham (50% at each site), using a Latin square randomization. Resting state connectivity will be collected 3 times: before the 1st day of TMS, after the 12th day of TMS, and before the 16th day of TMS (the last day administered).
The goal of this study is to compare pharmacy-based medication assisted treatment (MAT) with usual care MAT for people with opioid use disorder.
This randomized controlled trial research study will be evaluating an app, reSET-O, owned by Pear Therapeutics, Inc., to evaluate treatment retention rates in individuals with opioid use disorder after initiating medication assisted treatment.
An open-label study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ALA-1000 in opioid-dependent subjects. To characterize the PK profile of ALA-1000 in 5 single ascending dose cohorts and a sixth cohort of single ALA-1000 after receiving buprenorphine sublingual films for 7 days.
This pilot study evaluates a collaborative care program to assist with opioid tapering in patients with chronic pain. Patients will be randomized to receive the intervention or usual care.
This study will test the impact of implementing the Communities That Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) intervention on opioid overdose deaths within 67 highly affected communities with the goal of reducing opioid overdose deaths by 40%.
This study's specific aims were to: develop a digital intervention as a prevention intervention through focus groups with 40 youth; pilot-test the developed digital intervention with 30 adolescents, using methods from the investigator's prior research; develop implementation strategies and partners through focus groups with 50 School Based Health Alliance affiliates and 30 adolescents from an Advisory Council.
Among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), 90% report lifetime trauma exposure and 33% meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The co-occurrence of OUD and PTSD is associated with worse mental health and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) outcomes relative to either diagnosis alone. Prolonged exposure therapy (PET) is an efficacious cognitive-behavioral treatment for reducing PTSD severity. Although preliminary findings indicate that PET may reduce PTSD symptom severity among patients receiving treatment for concomitant OUD, it is unclear to what extent improvements were a function of PET versus the effects of OAT itself. Therefore, the question of whether OAT alone may attenuate PTSD symptoms in the absence of intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy remains unanswered. In this 12-week trial, we aim to investigate the contribution of PET above and beyond OAT alone for reducing PTSD symptoms among adults with concurrent PTSD and OUD. Participants will be randomized to one of three conditions: (a) OAT as usual, (b) OAT + PET, or (c) OAT + Enhanced PET (OAT+PET+). Those randomized to OAT as usual will continue to receive standard buprenorphine or methadone treatment from their current treatment provider and complete assessments of PTSD symptom severity, psychosocial functioning and drug use at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. In addition to receiving OAT and completing monthly assessments, OAT+PET participants will receive PET consisting of 12 weekly, individual sessions with a trained therapist. Finally, OAT+PET+ participants will receive the procedures noted above for the OAT+PET group plus monetary incentives delivered contingent upon completion of PET sessions. Given the poor PET adherence rates reported among patients with substance use disorders, the use of incentives will ensure that we evaluate PET effects among patients who receive a sufficient dose of therapy. The proposed study design will permit us to disentangle the effects of PET from the effects of OAT alone while also including experimental conditions that reflect real-world practice. Taken together, this project will produce important new scientific and clinically-relevant information related to the mechanisms through which OAT and PET promote reductions in PTSD symptomatology in a highly vulnerable clinical population.
Prevalence of smoking among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) is six-fold that of the general US adult population. The mortality rate of opioid-dependent smokers is four times that of opioid-dependent nonsmokers, and their response to smoking cessation interventions is notoriously poor. A national policy of reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes has the potential to be an effective method of reducing tobacco use prevalence, dependence, and related adverse health outcomes. Controlled trials in the general smoker population have demonstrated that switching smokers to low nicotine content cigarettes results in reductions in cigarettes per day (CPD), dependence and tobacco toxicant exposure, with few adverse consequences. The investigators believe that the impact of reduced nicotine standards on use of combusted cigarettes in this population will be moderated considerably by other tobacco market conditions including (1) availability of alternative sources of non-combusted nicotine, and (2) whether these alternatives are available under conditions that optimize their appeal. The investigators hypothesize the same for other vulnerable populations as well, but achieving significant reductions in use of combusted cigarettes in smokers with OUD seems especially unlikely in the absence of readily available and appealing alternative sources of non-combusted nicotine. The goal of the proposed trial is to experimentally model whether increased availability and appeal of an alternative, non-combusted source of nicotine (e-cigarettes) will enhance the effectiveness of a reduced nicotine standard for cigarettes in smokers with OUD. Additionally, the investigators will test whether allowing participants to personalize the favor of the e-liquid alters any moderating effects their availability may have on tobacco cigarette smoking. Daily smokers who are receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment will be recruited at University of Vermont and Johns Hopkins University. The investigators will study two research cigarettes referred to here as RC1 and RC2. One of these cigarettes will be a normal nicotine content cigarette and the other will be a reduced nicotine content cigarette. Investigators will study two e-cigarette conditions referred to here as EC1 and EC2. Both e-cigarette conditions will involve the same commercially available devices and same nicotine-containing e-liquid, but in one condition that e-liquid will be available only in tobacco flavor while in the other condition that e-liquid will be available in multiple flavors from which participants can choose based on personal taste preference. Participants will be assigned to one of the following four study conditions: (1) RC1 only; (2) RC2 only; (3) RC2 + EC1; (4) RC2 + EC2. Participants will be asked to use only their assigned study products for 16 weeks. Outcome measures include total CPD, cigarette demand assessed by behavioral economics-based purchase tasks, craving, withdrawal, psychiatric symptoms, breath carbon monoxide (CO), biomarkers of tobacco toxicant exposure, brain function and structure, and airway inflammation (fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath [FeNO]).