View clinical trials related to Obesity, Morbid.
Filter by:An important step during a gastric bypass operation for the treatment of morbid obesity is the measuring of the small bowel length. At several reoperations we found a length increase of the lowest part of the small intestine of up to 80% compared to the measured length at the initial operation. On the one hand, this reflects a normal technical error of small bowel measuring due to the variable state of contraction of the bowel, but on the other hand, it could also be due to a compensatory increase in intestinal length after the operation. New protocols allow measuring of the small bowel length by MRI. Comparing the preoperative and later on several postoperative measurements by MRI with the initial intraoperative length measuring should allow to validate the new MRI protocol and in the same time quantify the eventual small bowel length increase. We plan to include 20 patients in this study.
The aim of this study is to assess that the sleeve gastrectomy can improve the risk benefit than the gastric bypass
Levels of tocotrienol in human tissues following supplementation is not currently known. The objective of this present study is to determine the levels of this form of vitamin E in the human tissues such as skin, heart, lung, liver, adipose tissue, Brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following oral supplementation
Despite progress in understanding the pathophysiology of obesity, current strategies for its medical management remain largely ineffective. Most efforts have focused on reducing caloric intake or increasing energy expenditure, either through behavior modification (e.g. dieting, regular exercise) alone, or augmented by pharmacologic efforts to decrease appetite, inhibit fat absorption, or alter metabolism. Bariatric surgery remains the only proven long term treatment of morbid obesity. Super morbidly obese (SMO: Body Mass Index (BMI) > 50) and super super morbidly obese (SSMO: BMI > 60) patients lose considerable weight, but stabilize at Body Mass Indexes (BMIs) that are still obese or even morbidly obese after risking considerable morbidity and/or mortality. Among commonly performed bariatric surgeries, a laparoscopic two-stage procedure, in which an initial restrictive procedure is followed after a weight loss of ~100 lbs by a more complex procedure that creates malabsorption, is gaining interest. Initial studies have demonstrated very good long-term weight loss with minimal morbidity, and no operative mortality in these high risk patients. Availability of biospecimens obtained at each stage of this protocol will allow participating scientists a unique opportunity to test in human tissues hypotheses developed in animals. Studies proposed under this application focus on fatty acids and overall fat disposition in fat depots (adipose tissue) of your body, and the role of adipose tissue hormones and inflammatory processes in obesity and its associated health related issues.
The aim of this study is to assess whether the energy you burn daily increases after you have bariatric surgery. Until now, there hasn't been an effective way of measuring all activity on a daily basis. Physical Activity Monitoring System (PAMS) has been created just for this purpose. PAMS is a garment that can be worn under your clothes, that records body position and movement through space. We will use the PAMS along with special water to measure your total daily energy expenditure right before surgery, and again 6 months and 24 months after surgery. Study subjects will be initially recruited from OHSU IRB-Approved advertisements. Interested study subjects will be screened through an informal telephone interview. If there are no health conditions that exclude participation, subjects will be asked to give IRB-approved consent. Subjects will be consenting to undergo three 18 day phases. Each phase will consist of 15 daily visits to the Clinical & Translational Research Center (CTRC), and 3 full day and nights in the CTRC.
The sleeve gastrectomy that has been utilized as a first-stage bariatric procedure to reduce surgical risk in high-risk patients by induction of weight loss is now gaining popularity as a standalone procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. It appears to be a technically easier and/or faster laparoscopic procedure than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. It brings good weight loss results, in some studies even comparable to the RYGB and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch. The mechanism of action is assumed to be purely restrictive, but some neurohumoral interaction may exist. Almost no data exist on the influence of the sleeve gastrectomy on the medical and general quality of life or resolution of comorbidities. The rates of the comorbidities resolution 12 to 24 months after sleeve gastrectomy has been reported in the range that seems to be higher than for the purely restrictive procedures. Our goal is to to compare the surgical and weight loss outcomes between the two procedures, their influence on resolution of common comorbidities and on quality of life change. 150 eligible candidates will be randomized into two groups, one will undergo Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, the other will have Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass done. Detailed evaluation and preoperative questionnaires will be used to obtain demographic and medical data, and quality of life will be assessed. General metabolic and nutritional work up will be done, and will be reassessed at different intervals up to 5 years, in order to compare the short and long term results of the two procedures.
Morbid obesity currently affects more than 11 million US adults and is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and arthritis. Bariatric (weight loss) surgical procedures have been shown to significantly reduce body weight and improve the health and quality of life of morbidly obese adults, at least in the short term. However, bariatric surgery also presents substantial risks, including a 10% to 20% risk of serious complications and up to a 2% risk of death in the first 30 days after surgery. Thus, a morbidly obese patient's decision regarding bariatric surgery should be based on his or her evaluation of accurate information on the possible risks and benefits of the various treatment options. Anecdotal reports suggest that bariatric treatment decisions may be more heavily influenced by insurance coverage and reimbursement rates than patient preferences. The main objective of the current proposal is to examine the impact of a bariatric decision aid, Weight loss surgery: Is it right for you?, on decision quality in primary care and bariatric specialty practice settings. We propose a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of this bariatric decision aid on bariatric-specific measures of patient knowledge, values and choice of weight management strategy. We will also investigate the effect of the decision aid on decisional conflict and decisional self-efficacy and examine medical, psychological, and behavioral factors as mediators and moderators of treatment choice. This information will help to elucidate the value of this decision aid in improving decision quality. The primary aims of this of this research are to: 1. Determine if the bariatric decision aid results in superior bariatric surgery decision quality than an NIH booklet on weight loss surgery ('usual care'). 2. Determine if the bariatric decision aid results in less decisional conflict and superior decisional self-efficacy than usual care. 3. Determine if there is a differential effect of the interventions on decision quality among treatment seekers and non-treatment seekers. 4. Investigate medical, psychological, and behavioral factors as mediators of treatment choice. The secondary aims of this study are to: 1. Understand the current weight control attitudes and practices among morbidly obese patients who are not actively seeking bariatric surgical treatment. 2. Assess the rates of bariatric surgery, health care costs, health care use and outcomes, and changes in BMI over time across the intervention groups, as well as across study subgroups, such as those who did and did not choose to have bariatric surgery. We hypothesize that the decision aid will result in greater knowledge and greater values concordance, less decisional conflict and superior decisional self-efficacy than the NIH booklet.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the potential predictive psychological variables and success after bariatric surgery. The investigators will also investigate the purpose of a pre- and postoperative psychological intervention.
The changes in risks of developing coronary heart disease in patients with morbid obesity after different weight loss interventions have not been extensively studied. The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether an intensive lifestyle intervention program in a tertiary care clinic (Spesialsykehuset for Rehabilitering) is comparable with a 7-week low-energy-diet followed by bariatric surgery in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease in these patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the natural course of the androgen profile after bariatric surgery in men with obesity related hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.