View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:Patients with refractory and/or recurrent solid tumor have poor prognosis despite complex multimodel therapy and therefore, novel approaches are urgently needed. This study attempts to treat these diseases using T cells genetically modified with a 4th generation lentiviral chimeric antigen receptor (4SCAR fused with an inducible apoptotic caspase 9 domain) targeting CD276 (B7-H3). The 4SCAR-CD276-modified T cells (4SCAR-276) can recognize and kill tumor cells through the recognition of CD276, a surface protein expressed at high levels on many types of tumors but at low levels on normal tissues. This study will evaluate the side effects and effective doses of 4SCAR-276 in treating refractory and/or recurrent tumors.
This is a prospective study of rare neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors. Subjects will be enrolled via informed consent, and blood and/or saliva and tissue will be collected. This is designed to work in conjunction with IRB#831990 which is a retrospective protocol. The University of Pennsylvania will be a contributing site with the University of Michigan as the coordinating site for the A5 alliance, a multi-institutional collaborative designed to study neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors.
This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of a combination of 4th generation chimeric antigen receptor gene-modified T cells (4SCAR-T) targeting CD19-negative B-ALL that express alternative surface antigens such as CD22, CD10, CD20, CD38, and CD123, as many patients relapse after anti-CD19 immunotherapy. Clinical response and optiminzation of a standardized lentiviral vector and cell production protocol will be investigated. This is a phase I/II trial enrolling patients from multiple clinical centers.
A Phase I, First-in-Human, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Monoclonal Antibody PTX-35 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Refractory to Standard of Care
This study is open to adults with small cell lung cancer and other neuroendocrine cancers that are positive for the tumour marker delta-like 3 (DLL3). The study is in people with advanced cancer for whom previous treatment was not successful or no standard treatment exists. The purpose of this study is to find out the highest dose of BI 764532 and the best treatment schedule that people can tolerate. BI 764532 is an antibody-like molecule (DLL3/CD3 bispecific) that may help the immune system fight cancer. In this study, BI 764532 is given to people for the first time. That means no clinical data are available for BI 764532. Participants get BI 764532 either weekly or once every 3 weeks. If there is benefit for the participants and if they can tolerate it, the treatment is given for a maximum of 3 years. During this time, participants visit the study site about 20 times depending on the response to the treatment. Doctors record any unwanted effects and regularly check the general health of the participants.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of CC-94676 in men with progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
The primary objective of the study was to assess investigate the pharmacokinetic effects of Apatinib on Rosuvastatin or Metformin. The secondary objective of the study was to assess the safety of Apatinib alone or Rosuvastatin/Metformin alone or concomitant medication.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Surufatinib plus Sintilimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumor
The objectives of this registry study are to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes that measure the effectiveness and safety of STaRT.
This is a prospective data collection of treatment outcome for newly diagnosed oligometastatic breast cancers with 1-3 bone metastases. Eligible patients will be identified from the weekly Breast MDC. Patients will receive the recommended systemic and local treatment (including metastases directed SBRT) according to our clinical practice guidelines.Patients will be followed according to our routine with clinical and radiologic assessment. It is preferred that the same imaging method that was used to originally detect the metastases be used in follow-up assessments. The first imaging for SBRT sites will be three months post SBRT and every three months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year, then annually. Response and progression for these metastases will be evaluated using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). Changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional measurement) of the tumor lesions is used in the RECIST criteria. If functional imaging (bone scan, PET) were used at staging, changes in the uptake will be used in follow up scans to determine response to treatment and progression. As for SBRT related morbidities, we will use the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5) for toxicity reporting and scoring.