View clinical trials related to Myocardial Ischemia.
Filter by:Markers of DNA damage and repair are present in both atherosclerotic plaques and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with coronary artery disease. A positive correlation has been observed between the level of DNA damage and the severity of atherosclerotic lesions, as well as atherogenic risk factors such as smoking, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. A number of in-vitro studies have implicated defective DNA repair in the development and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. In mouse models of atherosclerosis, the DNA repair signalling cascade has been shown to be amenable to pharmacological intervention and overexpression of specific repair proteins attenuate the development of atherosclerotic plaques. However, data regarding the role of DNA repair in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in humans are lacking. We have preliminary data indicating reduced DNA repair activity in patients with stable angina. This study will determine the molecular basis and the biological consequences of this observation.
The trial will include 5000 patients with evident or suspected ischemic heart disease refered to Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, for perfusion imaging by 15O-H2O PET/CT scan of the heart during rest and stress. The patients will undergo the clinical scan as normal. Data from the scans will be used to determine reference values of the examination. Follow up will be done for up to 10 years in regards to major cardiovascular events in order to determine the prognostic value of the scan.
In Patients with stable Angina pectoris CCS 1-3 exercise testing for ischemia detection is widely used despite the known limitations. Measurement of the FFR is invasive but gold standard for Ischemia detection. Adding of parameters of spiroergometer might help to improve diagnostic accuracy of non invasive exercise testing. Therefore the trial is evaluating diagnostic accuracy of spiroergometric parameters compared to invasive FFR measurement.
This is a prospective registry to enroll complex high-risk coronary heart disease patients. The purpose of this study is to compare intracoronary physiology and imaging-guided intervention strategy and angiography-guided intervention strategy for clinical outcomes and health economics.
The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. AF patients are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e. aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor, to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF undergoing PCI were traditionally treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT, i.e. OAC plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) to prevent ischemic complications. However, TAT doubles or even triples the risk of major bleeding complications. More recently, several clinical studies demonstrated that omitting aspirin, a strategy known as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is safer compared to TAT with comparable efficacy. However, pooled evidence from recent meta-analyses suggests that patients treated with DAT are at increased risk of MI and ST. Insights from the AUGUSTUS trial showed that aspirin added to OAC and clopidogrel for 30 days, but not thereafter, resulted in fewer severe ischemic events. This finding emphasizes the relevance of early aspirin administration on ischemic benefit, also reflected in the current ESC guideline. However, because we consider the bleeding risk of TAT unacceptably high, we propose to use a short course of DAPT (omitting OAC for 1 month). There is evidence from the BRIDGE study that a short period of omitting OAC is safe in patients with AF. In this study, these patients are treated with DAPT, which also prevents stroke, albeit not as effective as OAC. This temporary interruption of OAC will allow aspirin treatment in the first month post-PCI where the risk of both bleeding and stent thrombosis is greatest. The WOEST 3 trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of one month DAPT compared to guideline-directed therapy consisting of OAC and P2Y12 inhibitor combined with aspirin up to 30 days. We hypothesise that the use of short course DAPT is superior in bleeding and non-inferior in preventing ischemic events. The primary safety endpoint is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the ISTH at 6 weeks after PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis at 6 weeks after PCI.
The primary aim of this study is to establish how frequently patients with coronary artery disease present or develop two anxiety disorders (panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder) in the two years following a medical intervention for their heart. A second objective is to assess the impact of these anxiety disorders on the health of these patients.
Prospective clinical study with two parts: PART A: a prospective biomarker-based risk screening study in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects PART B: a nested randomized clinical trial (RCT) in an enriched subpopulation of high-risk stable CHD subjects PART A: 12 000 subjects with stable CHD PART B: 2000 subjects with high risk of CV events will be randomized to usual care (UC) or personalised prevention program (PPP) i.e. 1000 subjects per arm. Study purpose is to assess the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of a personalised prevention program (PPP) in high-risk, stable coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects and to prospectively validate risk screening biomarkers
The aim of this study is to record hemodynamic pullback information using continuous resting full-cycle flow ratio (RFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease. The capacity of the two indexes to predict the hemodynamic outcome after stenting will be compared. Goals of the study are: - To study the accuracy of RFR/FFR gradients in predicting the change in whole-vessel RFR/FFR after PCI. - To identify a threshold in the RFR/FFR gradient that is predictive of pathological RFR/FFR also after the PCI of the first lesion.
This is a prospective, single center study involving 150 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain evaluation. The relationship between FFR values and inducible myocardial ischemia at the time of definite ischemia during adenosine stress testing will be investigated.
Multivessel TALENT is a prospective, randomized, multi-center study comparing clinical outcomes between SUPRAFLEX Cruz and SYNERGY in approximately 1550 patients with de-novo three vessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be treated according to "state of art PCI"; not only treatment strategies based on the latest ESC guideline, such as SYNTAX Score II recommendation, Heart Team discussion, post-procedure intravascular imaging optimization, cholesterol reduction by statin or PCSK-9 inhibitor, but also exploratory treatment strategies based on the latest evidence, such as physiological assessment using quantitative flow ratio and prasugrel monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.