Clinical Trials Logo

Myocardial Ischemia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Myocardial Ischemia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01476579 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Comparison of Low-radiation Dose CT Angiography With Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Coronary Disease

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is evaluating the performance of modern CT coronar angiography with low radiation technique compared to conventional invasive coronar angiography. The patients recruited will already be accepted for invasive coronary angiography based on clinical presentation, ECG and biochemical parameters. An "all-comers" design to avoid selection bias and no additional B-blockers will be used prior to CT angiography. The hypothesis is that it is possible to rule out significant coronary artery disease with sensitivity > 95 % and negative predictive value > 95 % with very low radiation doses.

NCT ID: NCT01475123 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Prospective Study of End Stage Renal Disease Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Treated by Oral Nicorandil

Start date: June 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Nicorandil is potentially effective to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving hemodialysis. The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate whether nicorandil is effective in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with CAD on hemodialysis.

NCT ID: NCT01474434 Terminated - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Efficacy of LCQ908 on Cardiovascular Risk

im
Start date: March 2011
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a study designed to evaluate the potential for the LCQ908 to impact cardiovascular risk.

NCT ID: NCT01472705 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Everolimus- Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comers

EverBio
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study sought to investigate safety and efficacy of biolimus-eluting stents (BES) with biodegradable polymer as compared with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with durable polymer through 3 years of follow-up.

NCT ID: NCT01471522 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)

ISCHEMIA
Start date: July 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. A blinded coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) was performed in most participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 to identify and exclude participants with either significant unprotected left main disease (≥50% stenosis) or those without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all major coronary arteries). Of 8518 participants enrolled, those that had insufficient ischemia, ineligible anatomy demonstrated on CCTA or another exclusion criterion, did not go on to randomization. Eligible participants were then assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization, if feasible, plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT. SPECIFIC AIMS A. Primary Aim The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization followed by optimal revascularization, if feasible, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure in participants with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia over an average follow-up of approximately 3.5 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for failure of OMT. B. Secondary Aims Secondary aims are to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared to a conservative strategy will improve: 1) the composite of CV death or MI; 2) angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire; 3) all-cause mortality; 4) net clinical benefit assessed by including stroke in the primary and secondary composite endpoints; and 5) individual components of the composite endpoints. Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Coronary CT Angiogram Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III per NIH Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III per NIH Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III per NIH

NCT ID: NCT01470274 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Safety of the CO-rebreathing Method in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and COPD Patients

Start date: November 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The primary objective is to establish the safety of the CO-rebreathing method for measuring total blood and plasma volume in CAD patients. The working hypothesis is that the CO-rebreathing method is safe in use with coronary artery disease patients and that it does not cause myocardial ischemia or cardiovascular damage.

NCT ID: NCT01469195 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

A Lead Rectangle to Lower the Operator's Radiation Exposure

Start date: December 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

During fluoroscopic imaging, diagnostic information is carried in the primary beam. These high intensity X-rays are the chief hazard to the patient. Lower energy scattered radiation deviates in all directions from the patient. Despite typical precautions (i.e., hanging a lead shield between the patient and the operator), many operators will be exposed to high radiation dose (higher than the permitted 50 miliS per year), this long term radiation exposure may result in stochastic and deterministic effects. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a non disposable radiation protection drape (that will cover the lower part of the patient) could help minimize the radiation scattered from the patient to the operator. In a procedure done through the Radial approach, there is a large portion of the patients (from the umbilicus and down) that is a source of scatter radiation to the operator. This portion can be covered with a lead rectangle. A non disposable, lead drape of uniform thickness will be inserted into a sterile nylon bag and will be used during fluoroscopic and cineangiography coronary angioplasty procedures. The lead drapes will cover the femoral puncture site. The widths and length of the drape is 50-60cm and 100 cm respectively and was shown not to hinder the field of radiation needed for fluoroscopy and cineangiography. (The upper border of the lead is under the patient's umbilicus and was shown not to interfere with the radiation field needed for angiography or angioplasty). The Investigators anticipate that the study will show a significant reduction in radiation exposure and hence reduce the radiation hazard to the operator.

NCT ID: NCT01468675 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Health Information Technology (HIT) Enhanced Family History Documentation and Management in Primary Care

Start date: February 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Growing evidence and understanding of an inherited component to several common, chronic diseases has led to an increase in the importance of information about family health history, and the integration of this information with other risk factors for common diseases, like lifestyle risk factors. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends the use of family health history as a routine genetic screening test for common diseases, as obtaining a complete family health history is the first step to identifying patients who are in need of intervention (e.g., intensive screening, lifestyle modification, preventative therapies, genetic counseling). The importance of integrating family health history with an individual's medical record will increase as our understanding of the genome evolves because it will be more essential to put detailed personal genetic information into a clinical context. Because of limited time during a typical primary care visit, and the concerns of primary care providers (PCPs) about their self-efficacy of estimating and providing guidance about risk, PCPs frequently do not obtain a family health history or provide individualized risk assessment. These issues highlight the need to leverage technology to collect these data independent of clinic visits, yet have these data interoperate with an individual's electronic health record (EHR). Telephonic interactive voice response systems (IVRS) and self-administered web-based tools are a low-cost, sustainable way of reaching out to primary care populations, independent of a visit. We propose to develop, implement, and evaluate a patient-reported, EHR-integrated personalized risk assessment module to provide tailored disease risk and risk reduction information. The Specific Aims of the proposed project are to: Aim 1: Develop a patient-reported, EHR-integrated, personalized risk assessment module to provide tailored disease risk and risk reduction information for four common diseases (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, coronary heart disease, and type II diabetes) for the patient and his/ her PCP. Aim 2: Measure the reach and effectiveness of this integrated risk assessment module by conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of adult primary care patients in the Brigham and Women's Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network. Aim 3: Evaluate facilitators and barriers to the adoption and implementation of this integrated risk assessment module. This project will further our understanding of how technology can be used to fill a gap in current clinical practice by facilitating the systematic collection of family health history and lifestyle risk factor data and integrating these data with an individual's EHR to personalize care in a variety of settings and for diverse patient populations. This work will use current national data standards for interoperability, and lessons learned from this project will be exportable to healthcare settings throughout the United States.

NCT ID: NCT01466452 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Arteriosclerosis

Antiplatelet Effect of Low Doses of Aspirin Taken Every 12 Hours in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and/or Aortic Valve Surgery

ASABYVALV
Start date: September 2011
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study is a randomized open label study that implies the administration of asprin according to three different regimens. The aims of the study are: - to establish whether coronary artery bypass surgery and / or aortic valve replacement surgery with bioprostheses is associated with changes in the rate of platelet regeneration that can reduce the effectiveness of aspirin administered at a dose of 100mg/die in terms of inhibition of platelet biosynthesis of thromboxane A2. - to determine whether these patients need a different (shorter) interval of administration in order to completely and permanently inhibit the platelet COX-1. The endpoints of this study are: - To evaluate the changes in the levels of TXB2 and 12-HETE in serum at 12 and 24 hours after administration of aspirin and the changes in the levels of 11-dehydro TXB2 urinary 8-iso-PGF2 alpha urinary, 2-3 dinor-6-chetoPGF1 alpha, Verify-NOW Aspirin, platelets crosslinked at 12 and 24 hours after administration of aspirin

NCT ID: NCT01464671 Terminated - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Angiomax® or Unfractionated Heparin for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

STATUS PCI
Start date: July 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The objective of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Angiomax® (bivalirudin) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients presenting with stable angina or silent ischemia (positive stress test without chest pain) that undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint of the study will be major and minor bleeding events, defined by the REPLACE-2 trial definition, during the index hospitalization and up to 30 days post discharge.