Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Subjects Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide
Verified date | May 2020 |
Source | Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo along with standard care treatment, in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) (an affective disorder manifested by either a dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities, the mood disturbance is prominent and relatively persistent), including the risk for suicide as assessed by the Investigator, in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 68 |
Est. completion date | February 1, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | February 1, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 64 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder - Participants must have current suicidal ideation with intent - In the Investigator's opinion, participant must be in need of acute psychiatric hospitalization due to imminent risk of suicide - Participant has a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 22 predose on Day 1 - As part of standard of care treatment, participant agrees to be hospitalized voluntarily for a recommended period of 5 days after randomization (that is, through Day 5), and take prescribed non-investigational antidepressant therapy(ies) for at least the duration of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 25) Exclusion Criteria: - Participant has a current clinical diagnosis of bipolar or related disorders, intellectual disability, or cluster b personality disorder (example, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder) - Participant meets DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder, based on clinical interview - Participant has a current or prior diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychosis, or obsessive compulsive disorder - Participant with a history or current signs and symptoms of liver or renal insufficiency; significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disturbances - Participant has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than [>] 160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg) despite diet, exercise or a stable dose of an allowed anti-hypertensive treatment at Screening; or any past history of hypertensive crisis |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hour Post-dose in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Sustained Response Based on MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | Sustained response is defined as a reduction from baseline in MADRS total score of greater than or equal to 50 percent, with onset on Day 1 that is maintained through the end of the double-blind phase (Day 25). The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Day 1 to Day 25 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 2 in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25) in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score During the Double-Blind Phase | Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the double- blind phase was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. | Day 1 (4 hours postdose), Day 2 (double blind phase), Double blind phase -Endpoint (Day 25) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score at Follow up Phase Endpoint | Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the follow up was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. | Follow up phase-endpoint (Day 81) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-hours Post-dose in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates numerous clinical global impression (CGI) severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for the double-blind phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk Score (Follow-up Phase) | SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for follow up phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4- Hours Postdose in SIBAT-Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Double Blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase) | SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Follow-up Phase) | SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase Endpoint (Day 81) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes,attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide,level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation.BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-endpoint (Day 25) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Follow-up Phase) | BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Hopelessness Scale Total Score (Double-blind Phase) | BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase. | Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05537558 -
Precision Medicine for the Prediction of Treatment (PROMPT) Response (PROMPT)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02192099 -
Open Label Extension for GLYX13-C-202, NCT01684163
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03142919 -
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Challenge in Depression
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05547035 -
Identification of Physiological Data by a Wearable Monitor in Subjects Suffering From Major Depression Disorders
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02940769 -
Neurobiological Effects of Light on MDD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05892744 -
Establishing Multimodal Brain Biomarkers for Treatment Selection in Depression
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05537584 -
SMART Trial to Predict Anhedonia Response to Antidepressant Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05061706 -
Multicenter Study of Lumateperone as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04479852 -
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of SP-624 in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04032301 -
Repeated Ketamine Infusions for Comorbid PTSD and MDD in Veterans
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05527951 -
Enhanced Measurement-Based Care Effectiveness for Depression (EMBED) Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03511599 -
Cycloserine rTMS Plasticity Augmentation in Depression
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04392947 -
Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05895747 -
5-HTP and Creatine for Depression R33 Phase
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05273996 -
Predictors of Cognitive Outcomes in Geriatric Depression
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05813093 -
Interleaved TMS-fMRI in Ultra-treatment Resistant Depression
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05135897 -
The Neurobiological Fundaments of Depression and Its Relief Through Neurostimulation Treatments
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04509102 -
Psychostimulant Augmentation of Repetitive TMS for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06026917 -
Assessing Dopamine Transporter Occupancy in the Patients With Depression Brain With Toludesvenlafaxine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets Using 11C-CFT Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06145594 -
EMA-Guided Maintenance TMS for Depression
|
N/A |