View clinical trials related to Infarction.
Filter by:This study aims to determine whether aldosterone blood levels are predictive of cardiac remodeling at 6 months following myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI), independently of conventional predictive factors (size of myocardial infarction, age, hypertension, etc.) in revascularized patients during the acute phase of MI.
The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the efficacy of high dose tirofiban administered as either an intracoronary bolus alone or as an intravenous bolus followed by a maintenance infusion with respect to microvascular perfusion and long term left ventricular infarct size, volumes and function.
The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) occurring after an influenza-like illness using linked primary care and disease registry databases.
The study is an open, single center, observational study at the Cardiology Dept at Uppsala University Hospital. The number of patients included will be 410. The objectives are to: Evaluate biomarkers and change of these related to myocardial infarction, during two years follow-up in an unselected patient population with a recent myocardial infarction. Evaluate if an early change of biomarkers can be related to death, new myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke in the same population after two and five years follow-up.
Hypothesis: Based on available pharmacokinetic data from healthy volunteers we hypothesize that the administration of a cumulative dose of 210μg of the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, Mircera® (Roche), during 3 months post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not result in hemoglobin (Hb) levels >15 g/dl in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) Design: Prospective, open label single center pilot study
Treatment of myocardial infarction (blood clot in the arteries of the heart) has improved after introduction of 24/7 balloon angioplasty to open the blocked artery. However, the clot itself is not routinely removed but recent data in smaller trials indicate that this might improve recovery and prognosis. In this multicenter study of 5000 patients referred to Scandinavian hospitals for myocardial infarction the investigators test the hypothesis that patients randomized to treatment with thrombus aspiration (removing the blood clot by manual suction) before conventional angioplasty will have a reduced risk of death, fewer rehospitalisations, fewer new myocardial infarctions, reduced risk of heart failure, better coronary artery flow after angioplasty and greater reduction of infarct size compared to patients randomized to conventional angioplasty alone.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate left ventricular systolic ejection fraction and anterior or apical akinesis 1 month and 3 months after a myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI to determine whether improvement at 1 month differs from improvement at 3 months.
Practice in management of myocardial ischemia and infarction has changed significantly over the past 20 years, both in terms of immediate management and secondary prevention. The aim of this observational study is to utilize the established record linkage data available in Tayside to investigate the trends in survivors of myocardial infarction in Tayside since 1994.
The growing availability of cardiac computed tomography (CT)* in emergency departments (EDs) across the U.S. expands the opportunities for its clinical application, but also heightens the need to define its appropriate use in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. To address this need, we performed a randomized diagnostic trial (RDT) to determine whether integrating cardiac CT, along with the information it provides on coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) function, can improve the efficiency of the management of these patients (i.e. shorten length of hospital stay, increase direct discharge rates from the ED, decreasing healthcare costs and improving cost effectiveness while being safe).
Patients are admitted to the critical care unit of the hospital because of medical conditions that have a high likelihood of causing severe problems with blood flow, breathing, or brain function. These conditions also have a high likelihood of causing death. Approximately 10 to 15% of all critically ill patients die in hospital. A large amount of scientific evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of these deaths is due to a combination of blot clotting and inflammation in the blood vessels. Statins are drugs that interfere with cholesterol and fat metabolism. Cholesterol and fat in the blood are associated with blood clotting and inflammation in the blood vessels. Statins are known to be very beneficial in improving the survival after heart attacks, and in preventing heart attacks. The question that VASTVALUS asks is: do statins improve survival among all critically ill patients? In VASTVALUS, we will concentrate on patients that do not currently require a statin because of their medical condition e.g. after a heart attack, but we are concerned with the rest of the critically ill. In VASTVALUS, participating patients will receive either atorvastatin 80 mg daily or a placebo. Atorvastatin is a statin with a well-established record of safety and effectiveness. A placebo has no known medical activity. We will follow all patients in VASTVALUS to determine whether atorvastatin has any effect on the occurrence of death, stroke, heart attack, or kidney failure among the critically ill. Results from VASTVALUS will be shared with the medical community after the study is completed. As with all clinical trials, patients in VASTVALUS participate of their own choice, and can change their mind at any time.