View clinical trials related to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Filter by:Background Hepatocellular carcinoma, a malignant tumour of liver is one of the most common cancers worldwide. All India Institute Of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) being a tertiary care hospital receives about two to three cases of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) each day in the investigators Gastroenterology out patient department. Most of these patients present late when the disease is already advanced and no curative therapies can be offered. At this stage, palliative therapy forms the mainstay of treatment. This includes transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or Oral chemotherapy. Many patients also have involvement of branches of portal vein, which further limit therapeutic options. According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging of liver cancer, involvement of portal vein precludes any standard form of therapy. These patients have been recommended for experimental therapies. Various forms of chemotherapy have been tried this group of patients. HCC is a vascular tumour and thalidomide is an anti-angiogenic drug and inhibits vascularity and has been used in the treatment of HCC. Capecitabine is a novel drug, which gives continuous delivery of 5-FU and has been used in patients with HCC and has been found to be safe.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous acetic acid ablation (PAI) in the management of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients of cirrhosis of liver.
In this study, the investigators are to prospectively evaluate patient's survival, tumor response, and safety of RT followed by TACE in Child A patients with unilobar portal vein invasion.
The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Studies have shown TACE combined RFA to have better efficacy than RFA for medium-sized HCC (3-5 cm) and multiple-tumor HCC, but not for small HCC (≤3 cm). However, to our knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than RFA alone for the treatment of HCC recurrence after curative treatment. We hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than RFA alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with RFA alone for the treatment of recurrent HCC. Recurrent HCC in this study was defined as new tumors in the remnant liver, distant from the resection or ablation site after curative treatment of RFA or hepatectomy.
The standard treatment choice for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib, and its efficacy is limited. More active treatments were performed in patients with advanced HCC in China, which include radical hepatectomy or TACE. The study is to investigate whether the active treatment will profit survival of patients, and to evaluate the safety.
The purpose of this study is: Phase1: To evaluate the safety and determine the recommended dose (RD) Phase2: To evaluate the efficacy
The purpose of this study is to determine if PI-88 is effective and safe in patients who have had surgery to remove primary liver cancer.
Oncoxin is safe and results in improved survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
The purpose of this study is to evaluate overall survival in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) treated with HepaSphere/QuadraSphere Microspheres loaded with chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin compared to conventional transarterial chemoembolization with particle PVA, lipiodol, and doxorubicin.
This study is to determine whether JX-594 (Pexa-Vec) plus best supportive care is more effective in improving survival than best supportive care in patients with advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) who have failed sorafenib.