View clinical trials related to Heart Failure, Systolic.
Filter by:In non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) can be achieved through guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). LVRR is defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 10% in heart failure patients with a baseline LVEF of 40% or less, or an increase in LVEF of more than 40% at follow-up, which is classified as heart failure with improved EF (HFimpEF) according to current guidelines. Several studies have examined the prevalence and predictors of LVRR in NIDCM. However, there is a lack of research on LVRR in the context of contemporary pharmacotherapy. Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of ivabradine in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), improving patients' prognosis. A sub-study of the SHIFT trial indicated that ivabradine may also contribute to cardiac remodeling reversal in patients with HFrEF. However, there is limited evidence exploring the relationship between ivabradine and LVRR, particularly in the context of NIDCM. Consequently, this study is a retrospective, multi-center cohort study aiming to evaluate the impact of ivabradine on LVRR in patients with NIDCM in the current era of medical therapy. Furthermore, by conducting this study, we aim to gain insights into the potential role of ivabradine in promoting LVRR in NIDCM patients receiving contemporary drug therapy.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the effect of recombinant human Neuregulin-1 for injection on cardiac function and reverse ventricular remodeling in male patients with NT-proBNP ≤ 1700 pg/ml and female patients with NT-proBNP ≤ 4000 pg/ml and New York Heart Association class II-III chronic systolic heart failure, and to confirm its efficacy and safety.
Cardiac rehabilitation is a medically recommended program for patients with certain heart conditions. It includes exercise training, health education, and counseling. Unfortunately, many patients do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation. Some find it challenging to attend the in-person sessions. This study aims to compare two methods of delivering cardiac rehabilitation: in-person and through telehealth. The investigators want to know if the effects of these two programs are alike and if certain individuals benefit more from one program over the other.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether financial support in the form of a one-time $500 stipend would improve medication adherence and quality of life in low-income, socially-needy patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the post-discharge setting. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Will financial support improve heart failure quality of life? - Will financial support improve medication adherence? Participants will complete surveys on quality of life, social stress, and spending habits at their baseline visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive $500 at their baseline visit or $0 at their baseline visit. At their one month visit, quality of life and medication adherence will be assessed. These results will be compared between groups. The group that received $0 at their baseline visit will be provided $500 at their one-month visit and return for a two-month visit. At that visit, quality of life and medication adherence will be assessed. These results will be compared to their one-month results. Researchers will compare the 1-month quality of life scores and medication adherence scores between the immediate financial support vs delayed financial support. Researchers will also compare 1-month vs 2-month quality of life and adherence data for participants who were randomized to the delayed financial support group.
This clinical study will utilize allogenic bone marrow-derived culture-expanded MSC that are expanded from the NK1R+ Mesenchymal stem cells as a therapy for chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction delivered using the investigational Helix transendocardial delivery catheter.
This study aims to investigate whether the investigators can improve heart function in patients with heart failure who have undergone cardiac resynchronization therapy, but have not had an improvement in their heart function at least one year after the procedure. The investigators will evaluate whether placing a new pacing lead (electrode) in a different part of the heart may increase heart function and decrease heart failure symptoms.
The goal of this observational cohort study is to investigate the potential of fitness trackers in combination with machine learning algorithms to identify cardiovascular disease specific patterns. Two hundred participants will be enrolled: 1. 50 with heart failure 2. 50 with atrial fibrillation 3. 100 (healthy) individuals without the former two conditions All participants are given a Fitbit device and monitored for three months. Researchers will compare differences in heart rate variability patterns between the groups and devise a machine learning algorithm to detect these patterns automatically.
The goal of this study is to determine the impact of 12 weeks of Lp299v supplementation (20 million cfu/day vs. placebo) on exercise capacity, circulating biomarkers of cardiac remodeling, quality of life, and vascular endothelial function in humans with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) who have evidence of residual inflammation based on an elevated C-reactive protein level. This will be done in the setting of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
In heart failure patients, neuropsychological disorders have been prospectively linked to frequent hospitalizations, recurrent cardiac events, and mortality. Cognitive dysfunction is also a frequent comorbidity in heart failure (HF) patients. The benefit of cardiac rehabilitation between patients with cognitive dysfunction and patients without cognitive dysfunction is unknown. Investigators hypothesize that patients with cognitive dysfunction benefit more from cardiac rehabilitation programs than patients without cognitive dysfunction.
The goal of this randomized, controlled, open-label, interventional study is to evaluate whether, in patients with heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID), the administration of vitamin D in combination with sucrosomial iron is as effective as intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in improving symptoms of HF. The main hypothesis which the study aims to test is the non-inferiority of sucrosomial iron (± vitamin D) compared with FCM treatment, after 24 weeks. Primary endpoint: the performance of the Six-Minute Walking Test, comparing the mean difference from baseline of the distance walked by patients in meters. Participants will be evaluated in outpatient scheduled visits at 6, 12 and 24 weeks, performing blood tests, clinical evaluation, instrumental investigations and recording any adverse events, cardiovascular events, re-hospitalizations and fractures. The study will involve randomization into 3 groups with a 1:1:1 ratio: 1. Control group [standard of care]: administration of FCM (Ferinject®) with a dose between 500 and 2000 mg (depending on body weight and hemoglobin values), to be administered in 1 or 2 doses (time 0 ± 6 weeks) with possible additional administration of 500 mg at week 12 in case of persistent ID. 2. Sucrosomial iron group: administration of sucrosomial iron (SiderAl Forte®) at a dose of 60 mg (2 tablets) once a day for 24 weeks. 3. Sucrosomial iron and vitamin D group: administration of sucrosomial iron (SiderAl Forte®) at a dose of 60 mg (2 tablets) once daily + vitamin D3 (100,000 IU load at time 0, then 2,000 IU daily) for 24 weeks