View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND) is a multicenter study designed to identify genetic determinants of diabetic kidney disease. FIND will be conducted in eleven centers and in many ethnic groups throughout the United States. Two different strategies will be used to localize genes predisposing to kidney disease: a family-based genetic linkage study and a case-control study that utilizes admixture linkage disequilibrium. The center based at the Phoenix office of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK-Phoenix) will conduct family-based linkage studies among American Indian populations in the southwestern United States. Participants (index cases) with diabetes and kidney disease will initially be recruited, and their parents and siblings will also be invited to participate. Genetic material from these participants will be used to genotype markers throughout the genome. Linkage analysis will be conducted to identify particular chromosomal regions containing genes that influence susceptibility to diabetic kidney disease. Linkage analyses will also be used to identify genes influencing traits related to diabetic kidney disease, such as serum creatinine, urinary protein excretion, plasma glucose levels, blood pressure and blood lipid levels. Regions that show evidence for linkage will then be examined in more detail, with both genetic linkage and association studies, to attempt to identify the specific genes that influence diabetic kidney disease, or related traits. The identification of genes that influence susceptibility to diabetic kidney disease will lead to a better understanding of how kidney disease develops. In the long run, this may lead to improved treatment and prevention of diabetic kidney disease.
Despite the overwhelming focus on genetic and genomic causes of human disease over the past two decades, it has been estimated that genetics is currently known to explain only 20% and 40% of the etiology of common disease. Thus, it is becoming increasingly apparent that human disease is a consequence of both genetic susceptibility and environmental exposures. Importantly, while individuals cannot change their genetic composition, we do have the ability both personally and as a society, to influence our environment, promoting health and decreasing the risk of disease. The Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) aims to determine how the environment and gene-environment interactions can inform our understanding of human health and disease. As science has evolved, so too has the science of this project. This evolution was reflected in a change in the title of this project from the Environmental Polymorphisms Registry (EPR) to the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) to more accurately reflect the science that can be conducted. PEGS is a unique resource because of the depth of environmental phenotyping which includes extensive information from exposome surveys, as well as whole genome sequencing on a significant number of participants in the cohort. While it is small relative to genomic cohorts, none of these have the extensive environmental data that is present in PEGS. In addition, other cohorts with deep environmental data lack the depth of genomic data that is present in PEGS. Importantly, PEGS has already provided important analytic advances that are of great interest to and can be confirmed in larger cohorts such as All of Us. The Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) aims to provide a resource for environmental health translational research by examining gene-environment interactions in health and disease. PEGS is an extension of two previous efforts where it began as a pilot study, the Environmental Polymorphisms Study (EPS; IRB# 02E9004) and was approved subsequently as a full protocol titled the Environmental Polymorphisms Registry (EPR) (IRB #04-E-N0053 and transitioned to its current ID# 04-E-0053). The EPR was envisioned as a phenotype-by-genotype registry of participants who had donated DNA samples, and who had agreed to be contacted for follow-up clinical translational studies based on their DNA genotypes. At the time, the only information available was a participant s age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Further phenotyping of a participant and/or any biospecimens obtained were investigated during a follow-up translational clinical study on participants recruited based on their genotype (hence phenotype-by-genotype) and the PEGS was the first recruit-by- genotype study at the NIH. Following a period focused on recruiting approximately 15,000 participants to enable genotyping of rare (approximately 1% minor allele frequency) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the PEGS Consortium Project was undertaken in 2010- 2011 to examine, using the DNA of nearly 4,000 participants, approximately 700 SNPs in approximately 80 environmental response genes that work in concert with environmental exposures to elicit a phenotype. Several clinical follow-up studies, genotype-phenotype association studies, and publications have resulted from the PEGS Consortium Project. To expand phenotype information available to researchers, the Health and Exposure Questionnaire was administered between 2013-2014. In 2017, a more detailed Exposome Questionnaire which includes questions relating to the external and internal exposome was administered. This was an important resource through which to integrate exposures with genotype-phenotype association studies. Whole genome sequencing has now been performed on approximately 4700 participants who were reconsented for this purpose, as indicated above. Questionnaire data was fully adjudicated and combined in a robust and searchable database. With the increased power of the data available, the project was renamed as the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) and rolled out in Sept. 2021.
We aim to investigate the beneficial effect of adding grain fiber to daily rice meal in type 2 diabetic patients. We anticipate this intervention will improve glycemia and lipid profile in these patients.
The objective of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of a device (the KC-002 interactive wound dressing) in the promotion of healing in diabetic foot ulcers as compared with a conventional wound therapy regimen for subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, unmasked, controlled study. All patients will receive care for the diabetic foot ulcer during the study. Participation in the study is for 24 weeks.
Bone marrow cells were previously shown to enhance wound healing in experimental diabetes. In this pilot study, patients with chronic diabetic ulcers not healing under conventional therapy, will be treated with local application of autologous bone marrow cells.
The study uses a randomized, prospective cohort design to assess the impact of shared online health records on 1) patient safety, 2) health goal adherence and outcomes, 3) documentation of family history, and 4) barriers to the adoption of patient-physician communication technology. Hypothesis: the respective interventions will result in 1) improved patient safety 2) greater adherence to health care maintenance and chronic disease guidelines 3) more accurate documentation of family history 4) the identification of technology adoption enablers and barriers.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the balance between the risks and benefits of primary prevention by Aspirin in elderly Japanese patients with one or more cerebro/cardiovascular risk factors
Diabetes is prevalent in schizophrenics and may be induced by antipsychotic treatments. Several retrospective studies have suggested that psychiatric patients exposed to atypical antipsychotics may be at a higher risk for developing diabetes and ketoacidosis. The association between these atypical antipsychotics and the onset of diabetes is further strengthened by observations of: 1. the time sequence between the initiation of antipsychotic treatment and the onset of diabetes; 2. remission after the discontinuation of medications; and 3. re-emergence of diabetes following the re-introduction of atypical antipsychotics. The treatment emergent diabetes, along with other metabolic disturbances, represents a serious issue in the use of atypical antipsychotics. Major current debates and unresolved research issues which are also the focus of this proposal, are: 1. schizophrenia per se, versus the use of antipsychotics, in triggering diabetes; 2. whether there are differences between "typicals" and "atypicals" in such an effect; 3. whether there are differences among different "atypicals"; 4. whether, and to what extent, treatment emergent diabetes may be associated with, or independent of, weight gain, which also often is associated with the use of antipsychotics; and 5. genetic and environmental risks in association with treatment emergent diabetes. The policy of some hospitals in Taiwan that discourages the use of atypical antipsychotics for new onset schizophrenia directs the investigators to a study design looking at the associated diabetes of both types of antipsychotics. Such a design may provide some hints to the unresolved research issues mentioned above. Meanwhile, a broader defined term, X-syndrome, or metabolic syndrome, is being used to describe the diabetic condition associated with antipsychotics. X-syndrome is a risky condition leading to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, with insulin resistance as the major outcome, associated with two of the following conditions: truncal obesity (deposited in the thorax and abdomen, instead of the hips and thighs), high triglycerides, high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or hypertension. The proposed study will combine the phenotypes of diabetes and X-syndrome to explore the abnormal metabolism caused by antipsychotics, bridge important information gaps, and provide data contributing towards a better understanding of the risk and management of diabetes and X-syndrome associated with the use of antipsychotics. Three assessment tools, namely the Clinical Global Severity (Clinical Global Impressions - Severity) or the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANNS), the Diabetes Risk Assessment (ADA) and the Life Style Survey, together with physical measurements, collect additional information for this study. Diabetes related biochemistry, including glucose, insulin, leptin, lipids and glycohemoglobin, will be measured to form a composite phenotype for further pharmacogenetic studies. Candidate genes involved in pancreatic beta cell insulin secretion will be examined in priority to see if they play a role in the development of the antipsychotics-induced diabetes.
The primary objective of the study is: - To compare the effect of ATG treatment together with intensified insulin therapy (Group 1) on fasting and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide production with that of intensified insulin therapy only (Group 2) in type 1 diabetes mellitus of recent onset Secondary objectives are: - To compare the insulin doses between the two groups at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after diabetes onset - To compare the course of the specific humoral markers of autoimmunity between the groups - To evaluate the significance of in vitro testing of specific T-cell activation by an autoantigen in the long-term follow-up in type 1 diabetes - To assess the safety of ATG treatment in type 1 diabetes
Diabetes is 2-5 times more common in schizophrenia and it is a preventable; but the current diabetes prevention guidelines are not suitable for implementation in the severely mentally ill population. The principles of diabetes prevention are essentially dietary regulation, increased physical activity and adjunctive use of oral anti-diabetic drugs (metformin). In a modified diabetes prevention protocol suitable for use in mentally ill population, we packaged the original guide lines with an adventure and recreation program based on principles of experiential learning, cognitive restructuring and behaviour modification. In this proposed study, we plan to evaluate the feasibility of adopting the new protocol, and examine its effectiveness in preventing diabetes.