View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder, Major.
Filter by:This research proposal aims to better understand the neurobiology of depression in adolescents and how repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may therapeutically impact brain function and mood. This study will be the first to use a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled approach to the investigation of rTMS therapy for depressed adolescents. This approach will allow for the validation of rTMS treatment outcomes in the depressed adolescent population in a scientifically rigorous manner. The magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy pattern of rTMS response will be analyzed according to previously established protocols.
To assess the efficacy of Omega 3 Fatty acid (Omega 3 FA) augmentation of desvenlafaxine (DVS) compared to placebo augmentation of DVS when used to treat depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with select medical conditions (cancer, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes).
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending oral dose evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of DSP 1053 and its metabolites in healthy subjects and in subjects with major depressive disorder
The primary goals of this work are: a) to establish a unique collection of mood disorder patients across the life cycle, including children, adults and geriatric patients, with well-defined medical co-morbidities and medication treatment outcomes at the University Hospitals Case Medical Center Department of Psychiatry; b) to establish a collection of nuclear families, including both mothers and fathers, of children diagnosed with mood disorders; c) to perform a systematic genetic analysis of the proposed sample repository to identify genes and genetic variants contributing to inter-patient variability in clinical phenotypes and treatment responses. Our primary hypothesis is that genetic variations may underlie individual variability in disease susceptibility, clinical phenotypes and treatment safety, tolerability, and effectiveness.
The purpose is to study the efficacy and safety of ABT-436 in Major Depressive Disorder.
This study focuses on treating adolescents with depression. The study has two main purposes. The first is to compare a new form of therapy for depression called Behavioral Activation (BA) to the antidepressant medication fluoxetine. BA therapy helps depressed people get more involved in activities they find enjoyable, which can reduce symptoms of depression. Research shows that both BA and fluoxetine work to reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents. However, unlike previous research, this study examines how well the two treatment options work in comparison to each other. Participants in the study are randomized to receive treatment with either BA or fluoxetine for 18 weeks. The second aim of the study is to examine the brain functions of adolescents in both treatment groups. Participants undergo functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans before and after treatment. The data from these scans will be used to compare the brains of participants in the BA condition with those in the fluoxetine condition. Also, the scans may show possible differences between participants' brains before and after treatment. These data may help scientists determine the ideal form of depression treatment for different types of people.
The investigators are doing a research study to find out if riluzole, when taken along with a standard antidepressant (sertraline) can help people with major depression. This research study will compare riluzole + sertraline to placebo + sertraline. The investigators hypothesize that adding riluzole will lead to a better antidepressant response, in less time, then sertraline alone.
In recent years, there has been growing evidence that antidepressants are only marginally effective compared to placebo for mild to moderate depression. In other words, although many people improve when they take antidepressant medications, almost as many get better with placebo pills. One possible solution to this problem would be to give patients a trail of a placebo prior to giving them an antidepressant, however there are ethical issues with doing this deceptively. New evidence from other placebo-responsive disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome shows that people may benefit from placebos even if they know they are taking them. This study aims to determine whether giving placebos without deception to people with major depressive disorder followed by the option to switch to an antidepressant is an effective strategy. There will be 3 groups of subjects. The first group is a standard treatment arm and will receive duloxetine, an antidepressant. The second will be given a placebo with the option to switch to duloxetine if they do not improve. The third group will receive supportive clinical visits the option to switch to duloxetine if they do not improve. This design will allow us to determine whether a sequenced treatment of a placebo without deception and then the option to switch to an antidepressant is a viable strategy. It will also help us to determine to what degree the benefit comes from the ritual of receiving and taking the placebo tablet versus the benefit of visits with a doctor alone. The primary hypothesis is that there will be a less than 5% difference between response rates after 12 weeks in the sequenced placebo-then-antidepressant treatment group (both subjects who have remained on placebo as well as those who have switched to the antidepressant will be considered as one group) compared to the immediate antidepressant therapy group.
In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). The investigators will also explore the association between different domains of social cognition and outcomes relevant to psychotic disorder (e.g., symptomatology, social functioning, and vocational functioning).
This is an ancillary study to a clinical trial that is being conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. Investigators at MGH are conducting a clinical trial to test the efficacy of ziprasidone together with escitalopram for treatment-resistant depression (NCT00633399). This observational study will involve magnetic resonance scans to examine brain chemistry (neurotransmitter levels), brain activity, and functional connections between brain regions before and after participating in the trial. The neurotransmitters of interest are glutamate, glutamine, and GABA. Comparisons will be made between individuals who receive ziprasidone and individuals who receive an inactive placebo. Differences between participants who respond to standard antidepressants and those who require additional medication will also be examined. All participants will have a baseline magnetic resonance scan before starting medication. The second scan will be after 8 weeks of escitalopram treatment for those who respond or following 8 weeks of escitalopram plus ziaprasidone or placebo (16 weeks after starting) for those who do not respond to escitalopram alone. Participants will complete standard rating scales for depression at each visit.