There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to understand how a psychotropic medication called guanfacine affects brain network functioning in humans, and how this function interacts with cognitive impairments in people experiencing depressive symptoms.
The goal of this study is to implement Opioid Use Disorder Quality Measurement and Management (OUD-QM2) strategy by the Office of Addiction Services and Supports (OASAS) to drive change and improve treatment practices. Through a concurrent mixed methods approach that iteratively examines quantitative and qualitative data to inform the process, the investigators will examine the effects of the strategy on stakeholders-PWUD/patients, families, and providers-and outcomes. This comprehensive approach will allow for a "global" view of the perceived effects of the OUD-QM2 strategy for all stakeholders while allowing us to use administrative data to test the effects of the strategy on patient outcomes. Through qualitative interviews and focus groups conducted in years 1, 3, and 5 of the phase, the investigators will derive information from stakeholders about their perceptions and use of the quality measures. Through surveys conducted with all clinics, the investigators will elicit data on changes in provider use of quality measures, clinical practice, and use of measures for incentive-based contracting. Finally, the investigators will conduct a stepped wedge trial to examine the effects of performance coaching that guides clinics on use of the quality measures for clinical practice improvement. The trial will also benefit from a treatment as usual (TAU) condition of clinics not participating in the trial to examine secular trends in patient outcomes across the period of the OASAS QM2 strategy rollout. The overall aim is to build and test a science-based OUD-QM2 strategy for person-centered treatment.
This clinical trial evaluates the usefulness of various risk assessment tests, including Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) breath testing, questionnaires, and endoscopies for identifying participants at high risk for stomach cancer. H. pylori is a bacteria that causes stomach inflammation and ulcers in the stomach. People with H. pylori infections may be more likely to develop cancer in the stomach. H. pylori breath testing can help identify the presence of H. pylori infection in a participant and help identify if the participant may be at a higher risk of developing stomach cancer. An endoscopy uses a thin, flexible lighted tube that is inserted inside the esophagus, stomach, and first part of the small intestine. This allows the doctor to see and look for abnormal areas that may need to be biopsied. Risk assessment including H. pylori evaluation, questionnaires, and endoscopies may help identify participants at high risk for stomach cancer and may be a useful screening tool for earlier stomach cancer diagnosis.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine safety, feasibility, and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of CD22 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy (CART) cells when administered 28 to 42 days after an infusion of a commercial CAR called Tisagenlecleucel, to children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell leukemia.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects of early initiation of double low-dose aspirin in pregnant women. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does this dose and timing of aspirin reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia compared to standard recommendations? Does this dose and timing of aspirin reduce the risk of pregnancy loss compared to standard recommendations? Participants will begin taking at no later than 6 weeks 6 days gestational age, either 162mg of aspirin through delivery or placebo until 12 weeks and then 81mg of aspirin through delivery.
To find out if the combination of repotrectinib and fulvestrant can control the disease in participants with metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma.
This study will sample older Black adults to test their knowledge and opinions of hospice.
The PRA Effect on APAP Therapy Pressure Study is a randomized, controlled, crossover study in PAP-adherent participants with OSA. Pre-screening is conducted to establish potential eligibility based on regular usage of > 4 hours/night on patients who use an APAP device with a PRA mode. Participants would then be recruited as described below. For those who sign an informed consent, they will be instructed to use the device for the next 8 days with the PRA turned on for four consecutive nights and off for four consecutive nights, but in random orientation. To make sure that the device is not limited to APAP range when adjusting to respond to PRA, the upper limit will be changed to 20 cmH2O during the study. Additionally, only patients who have a current P95 of 8 cmH2O or greater will be eligible so that the maximum PRA setting of 3 cmH2O can be used.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Ab Interno Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy with the OMNI® Surgical System Compared to Standard Medical Treatment in Pseudophakic Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (EVOLVE)
This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, Phase 3 study for treatment of participants aged 12 years and older diagnosed with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The main objective of this study is to evaluate if those participants who received amlitelimab dose 1 in the parent studies (EFC17559 [COAST-1], EFC17560 [COAST 2], EFC17561 [SHORE]) and were responders can maintain their response either remaining at dose 1 or switching to dose 2 of amlitelimab compared to treatment withdrawal. Study details include: The study duration will be up to 64 weeks (for participants not entering the LTS17367 [RIVER-AD] study) including a 48-week randomized double-blind period, and a 16-week safety follow-up. The study duration will be up to 48 weeks for participants entering the LTS17367 [RIVER-AD] study at the Week 48 visit of EFC17600 (ESTUARY). The total treatment duration will be up to 48 weeks. The total number of visits will be up to 14 visits (or 13 visits for those entering LTS17367 [RIVER-AD] study).