There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The Overture Study is a randomized, controlled, single-blind multi-center clinical trial using the GammaSense Stimulation system to study safety, tolerability, and efficacy in people with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.
The objective of the study is to show that stenting the transverse-sigmoid sinus with the River stent is safe and has probable benefit to relieve clinical symptoms in subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The study will enroll 39 IIH subjects with moderate to severe visual field loss or severe headaches that have failed medical therapy. The primary safety endpoint is the rate of major adverse event at 12 months The primary probable benefit endpoint is a composite at 12 months of absence of significant sinus stenosis and clinically relevant improvement.
The purpose of this study is to establish the value of combined non-invasive stimulation (tDCS) and behavioral training (robotics) in SCI rehabilitation, and understand the mechanisms of this interaction and its relationship to functional outcome. The investigators hypothesize that supplementary tDCS will augment the functional improvement from robot-training, in chronic SCI.
This is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 study. The purpose of the study is to obtain evidence of efficacy for maintenance selinexor in participants with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Participants with primary stage IV or recurrent disease who are in partial or complete response after having completed a single line of at least 12 weeks of taxane-platinum combo therapy will be randomized in a 2:1 manner to maintenance therapy with 80 milligram (mg) with selinexor once weekly (QW) or placebo until progression.
There are two separate phases of this study. The purpose of the phase-I is to initially find a potent but reasonably safe dose of a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treating prostate cancer. Once this potent but reasonably safe dose is found, the phase-II will treat additional patients with SBRT to see what effects (good and bad) it has on prostate cancer. Phase-I - Primary objective: To escalate the dose of stereotactic radiotherapy to a tumorcidal dose without exceeding the maximum tolerated dose in patients with organ confined prostate cancer. - Secondary objective: To determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (if the maximum tolerated dose is reached) Phase-II - Primary objective: To determine the late severe grade 3-5 Gu and Gi toxicity at nine months from the start of the protocol treatment (graded base on the CTCae v3.0) - Secondary objective: To determine the 2 year biochemical Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) control (freedom from PSA failure), disease free and overall survival, local control, freedom from distant metastases, and the incidence of high grade adverse events of any type from the therapy in the treated patients in order to determine if the therapy is promising enough for further clinical investigation.
This study evaluates the relationship between anemia and stool microbiota in premature infants. It also evaluates the relationship between blood transfusion and stool microbiota.
The primary goal of this pilot study is to investigate whether psilocybin alters neuroplasticity in people with major depressive disorder. The primary hypothesis is that psilocybin will result in neuroplastic changes that parallel improvement in symptoms of depression.
This phase Ib trials studies the side effects and how well talimogene laherparepvec works when given together with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in treating patients with breast cancer that does not express the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein and has spread to other places in the body (metastatic), cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable), or has come back (recurrent). Biological therapies, such as talimogene laherparepvec, use substances made from living organisms that may attack specific tumor cells and stop them from growing or kill them. Chemotherapy drugs, such as nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Drugs used as endocrine therapy, such as letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen or fulvestrant, may lessen the amount of estrogen made by the body or may may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking estrogen from connecting to the cancer cells. Giving talimogene laherparepvec with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy may work better in treating patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.
This 2-part study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) compared to placebo in participants with surgically resected high-risk Stage II melanoma. Participants in Part 1 will receive either pembrolizumab or placebo in a double-blind design every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 17 cycles/~1 year (each cycle = 21 days). Participants who complete the initial treatment of 17 cycles of pembrolizumab in Part 1 and experience disease recurrence may be eligible for re-challenge with pembrolizumab at the same dose and schedule of 200 mg Q3W (21-day cycles) for up to 35 cycles (up to ~2 years) in Part 2 in an open label design. Participants who complete the initial treatment of placebo and experience disease recurrence may be eligible to switch over to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W (21-day cycles) for up to 35 cycles (up to ~2 years) in Part 2 in an open label design. The primary hypothesis of this study is that pembrolizumab increases recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo. Per protocol, response/ progression or adverse events (AEs) during re-challenge/switch-over in Part 2 will not be counted towards the RFS outcome measure or safety outcome measures respectively.
This study will evaluate whether use of antidepressants can reduce gingival inflammation in patients with periodontal (gum) disease.