There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of ALN-AGT01 on systolic and diastolic blood pressure and to characterize the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects and safety of ALN-AGT01.
This Phase 3 study will assess the safety and efficacy of inclacumab, a P-selectin inhibitor, in reducing the frequency of vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in approximately 240 adult and adolescent participants (≥ 12 years of age) with sickle cell disease (SCD). Participants will be randomized to receive inclacumab or placebo.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIS793 in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and placebo in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). This study aims to explore whether blockade of Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel can reduce fibrosis in PDAC, restore chemo-sensitivity and ultimately lead to improvements in overall survival (OS) and other clinically relevant outcomes.
This study is an open-label, phase 1/1b study of the pressure-enabled hepatic artery infusion of SD-101, a TLR 9 agonist, alone or in combination with intravenous checkpoint blockade in adults with metastatic uveal melanoma.
1. Determine agreement (accuracy) of resting heart rate measured by Vitalpercept when compared to an FDA-cleared electrocardiograph (ECG) device, LifeSignals Wireless Biosensor. 2. Determine agreement (accuracy) of resting respiratory rate measured by Vitalpercept when compared to an FDA-cleared capnographer, Capnostream 20.
This is a study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the investigational Cytovale System & IntelliSep Test as a diagnostic marker of sepsis in a population of patients presenting to the emergency department with signs or suspicion of infection compared to retrospective physician adjudication, per the sepsis 3 definition, of those patients.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the tumor objective response rate (ORR) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria in participants who receive sotorasib at either 960 mg daily or 240 mg daily whose tumors are programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) < 1% and/or harbor a serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) co-mutation, in a subgroup of participants with PD-L1 < 1% and in a subgroup of participants with STK11 co-mutation.
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a tumor in which malignant plasma cells accumulate in the bone marrow. It can cause organ damage and is not curable. Researchers want to see if a combination drug treatment can help. Objective: To try to prevent or slow down developing MM and its associated organ damage by treating it while still in the smoldering phase with a mix of drugs known as DKd. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older with smoldering MM that is at high risk of converting to symptomatic MM. Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests Bone survey (x-rays of their bones) Spinal magnetic resonance imaging Bone marrow biopsy (a needle is used to remove bone marrow from their hipbone) Electrocardiogram (to check heart function) Lung function tests Treatment will be given in 28-day cycles. Participants will get daratumumab by injection under the skin. They will get carfilzomib intravenously (IV) through a tube inserted in a vein. They will get dexamethasone as oral tablets or as an IV. They will get all 3 drugs for 8 or 12 cycles. Then they will get daratumumab alone for up to 24 cycles. They may have stem cells collected. Participants will have frequent study visits. At these visits, they will repeat some screening tests. They will complete questionnaires. They will have imaging scans. For these scans, they may receive an oral or IV contrast. Participants will have a follow-up visit 30 days after treatment ends. Then they will have visits every 3-12 months. They will be followed on this study for life.
This study will compare two available, evidence-based, digital pain treatment programs that patients can use at home. The goal is to see if one approach is better than the other, and whether certain patients respond to one more than the other. Study participants will be randomized to receive one of two treatment programs: Skills-Based VR or painTRAINER. Study devices will be delivered to the participant's home with instructions for use via FedEx; participants will receive remote technical support. They will be followed for 60 days and complete Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires to assess functional status, pain levels, and use of pain medications (including opioids). Participants will also be asked to provide consent/authorization to access medical records from their treating facility.
The purpose of this observational study is to assess the effectiveness of Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus (CRFP) compared to other tooth-specific treatments (silver diamine fluoride (SDF), sealants, or other FDA-approved treatments) in preventing progression to cavitation in patients with at least one early non-cavitated dental caries lesion. The study will also evaluate the effectiveness of CRFP in comparison to no tooth-specific treatment control groups, including whole mouth treatments such as: 2.26% fluoride varnish, 1.23% fluoride foam, and 5000 ppm fluoride prescription toothpaste; and no treatment, on caries arrest and in preventing progression to cavitation in patients with at least one early non-cavitated dental lesion.