There are about 2656 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Puerto Rico. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of GSK Biologicals' trivalent MMR (Priorix), comparing it to Merck's MMR vaccine (M-M-R II), which is approved for use in the US in healthy children 12 to 15 months of age.
Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most prevalent orthopedic conditions worldwide. With the aging population, a 40% patient increase is expected to present at clinics with complaints of primary osteoarthritis by 2025. Multiple studies have attempted to establish non-surgical criteria for knee arthritis and usage of resources to avoid major surgery. It has long been accepted as a treatment option for patients who have failed to respond to NSAIDs and other non-surgical therapies to receive intra-articular injections of steroid and anesthesia mixtures to hold off disease progression. Various studies have compared different sites of injection and the accuracy rate of the injection being within the joint. Recent studies report a 66% accuracy on palpation-guided injection on the anterolateral knee, 93% accuracy on palpation-guided injection on the superolateral portal of the knee, and new studies show an improvement of up to 98% with use of ultrasound guiding software. However, in a health care system with limited resources, providing patients with US-guided injections represented an increased cost of $178.35 per patient as per 2010 Medicare reports. Therefore, assuming these accuracy rates, we will compare the anterolateral and superolateral portals for knee injection and their clinical effect to monitor if in fact there is a difference in patient reported outcomes. As a secondary analysis, if no difference is found, a strong case for palpation-guided injections versus ultrasound-guided injections can be made. In this study we will prospectively enroll 60 patients to be divided into two 30 patient groups with primary knee osteoarthritis. Patients that qualify as subjects will be treated with an intraarticular knee injection through an anterolateral portal or a suprapatellar portal as per group in which they are placed. Scores will be given for pain of the injection and of the baseline illness and compared on a subsequent visit to assess self-reported functional outcomes.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roxadustat for treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis
The study evaluates the efficacy of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) to reduce the annual rate of moderate and severe exacerbations compared with dual therapy of FF/VI or UMEC/VI in subjects with COPD. Published studies which assessed the use of an 'open' triple therapy (use of Inhaled Corticosteroid [ICS]/ Long-acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists [LAMA])/ Long Acting Beta-Agonist [LABA] delivered via multiple inhalers) in moderate-severe COPD patients, reported improvements in lung function, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), hospitalization rates and rescue medication use, compared to dual therapy (ICS/LABA) or LAMA alone. These studies have also shown similar safety profile with dual or monotherapy doses for periods of up to one year. Given the clinical experience with FF, UMEC and VI, and that the associated risks with these compounds are anticipated from their known pharmacology, the potential benefit of a new therapy option in patients with moderate to severe COPD supports the further development of the closed triple combination (delivered via one inhaler). In the current study subjects meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria will complete 2-week run-in period; 52 week treatment period and a 1-week safety follow-up period. Eligible subjects will be randomized to one of the following double-blind treatment groups FF/UMEC/VI 100 micrograms (mcg)/62.5 mcg/25 mcg once daily (QD), FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg QD, or UMEC/VI 62.5 mcg/25 mcg QD
The primary objective of the study is to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) of veliparib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (C/P) compared to placebo plus C/P in participants with a Breast Cancer Gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1; BRCA2) mutation in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic or locally advanced unresectable breast cancer. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) through the end of Week 24, objective response rate (ORR) and PFS on subsequent therapy (PFS2) in participants treated with veliparib in combination with C/P versus placebo in combination with C/P.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether tolvaptan is effective and safe for the treatment of late-stage chronic kidney disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)
Maraviroc is an antiretroviral medication that may help in improving mental function in HIV infected patients with mental problems by decreasing inflammatory tendencies. We will test this in a clinical trial of 42 HIV infected individuals with some mild to moderate mental problems who are already on HIV medications and doing well. We will add Maraviroc or a sugar pill to their HIV medications and see if mental function improves over 48 weeks. This study will be conducted at 2 sites in Hawaii and Puerto Rico.
Comparing the efficacy of Symbicort® pMDI and Formoterol Turbuhaler in reducing exacerbations in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the study drug known as dulaglutide in participants with type II diabetes who are taking once-daily insulin glargine. The study will last about 31 weeks for each participant.
The aim of this group-randomized trial was to test the effectiveness of a new comprehensive program, which the investigators called CALMA -plus, in increasing controller medication use and reducing asthma symptoms. CALMA-plus involved the CALMA home-based family intervention, plus educational training of physicians and nurses, as well as screening for asthma in clinics serving Medicaid island Puerto Rican children with asthma. Because the provider training was expected to have an impact on the entire clinical setting where trained providers work, as well as the patients using that setting, the investigators randomized clinic groups rather than individual patients. The investigators compared the CALMA-Plus intervention to a CALMA-only group, which the investigators expected to obtain the same benefits as the investigators have previously documented.