There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The EXAMINATION trial was a superiority trial that compared everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in an all-comer ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. The patient-oriented endpoint was not superior at 1-year, but it was at 5-year. However, very-long term follow-up is unknown. The study had an independent Clinical event Committee (CEC). All events were adjudicated by an independent clinical committee, according to the Academic Research Consortium 1.
Rationale: Throughout the years, there has been a rapid change in the perioperative protocols and procedures surrounding colorectal surgery. Upon the introduction of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in Western countries, an improvement in postoperative outcomes was seen. Nowadays, researchers focus on further improving the current standard ERAS programs enabling an accelerated version hereof. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of a 23-hour accelerated ERAS protocol (ERAS 2.0) for patients undergoing colorectal surgery compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who followed ERAS 1.0 for colorectal surgery. In this ERAS 2.0 protocol, patients undergoing colorectal surgery will be discharged within 23 hours after surgery. Study design: This study is an investigator-initiated, single-center prospective study. Study population: Patients aged ≥ 18 years ≤ 80 undergoing surgical resection for colorectal pathology that meet the eligibility criteria will be invited to participate in this study. Intervention: Adhering to a strict multidisciplinary and multifaceted ERAS 2.0 protocol, patients receiving elective colorectal surgery will be discharged 23-hours after surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Rate of the successful and safe application of the 23-hour accelerated ERAS 2.0 protocol for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Success rate will be measured in readmission rate and safety will be measured with rate of serious adverse events (Clavien Dindo ≥3b). Success rate (feasibility) will also be measured in percentage of patients who were not able to be discharged 23 hours after surgery.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fremanezumab as compared to placebo for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM). Secondary objectives are to further demonstrate the efficacy of Fremanezumab as compared to placebo for the preventive treatment of EM, to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Fremanezumab in the preventive treatment of EM and to evaluate the immunogenicity of Fremanezumab and the impact of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) on clinical outcomes in participants exposed to Fremanezumab. The total duration of the study is planned to be up to 51 months.
This study is a prospective, diagnostic, cohort study within the standard care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It compares the analytical performance of Siemens® point-of-care high sensitive troponin I testing in venous, plasma and capillary sample types. The investigators hypothesize that there is a good correlation between the Siemens® POC HS cTnI assay results for the three sample types and that the bias between different POC sample types reduces from ~10% to ≤ 5% when using heparinized transfer device for the capillary sample.
Rationale: constipation-related complaints are prevalent in 5-20% of the population. Dietary fibers play a crucial role in improving and maintaining gut health, increasing stool weight, stool frequency and improvement of stool consistency. Currently, very few adults meet the recommendation of 30 (females) or 40 (males) grams of fiber per day. Personalized dietary advice may be the solution to increase dietary fiber intake and reduce constipation-related complaints in large populations. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of personalized dietary advice (PDA) in reducing constipation-related complaints, by increasing dietary fiber intake in people with constipation-related complaints. Study design: This study has a one-group pre-test post-test design with a run-in period. The duration of the study is 8 weeks, which includes a 4-week run-in phase and a 4-week intervention period. All subjects receive the PDA. Study population: adult subjects with constipation-related complaints, defined as predominant Bristol stool form between 1-4 and not satisfied with their bowel habits (scale ranging from 1-10, cut-off <6). Possibly stool frequency ≤4 stools per week will be included as a definition. Subjects need to have a relatively low dietary fiber intake defined as <26 grams (females) or <33 grams (males), which is ≥15% below the recommendation of fiber intake. Intervention: personalized advice based on their habitual food pattern (as assessed using a food frequency questionnaire) and preferences. Based on a special algorithm, the PDA provides high fiber alternatives for low-fiber products that subjects currently use, close to their current eating behavior, to help increase dietary fiber intake. This PDA will be provided using an online web-portal. Main study parameters/endpoints:primary outcomes are stool pattern, gastrointestinal complaints and constipation quality of life and severity. Secondary parameters include dietary fiber intake, physical activity, body weight, psychological questionnaires, and fecal microbiota composition and metabolite levels. Furthermore, the PDA will be evaluated.
Rationale: Despite the availability of effective treatment to reach symptom control, nearly half of the asthma patients remain inadequately controlled. There is a need for timely and appropriate treatment of patients with uncontrolled asthma. Improving asthma control could be achieved by a better identification of causes followed by remediating modifiable factors in primary care or referral to secondary care. However, major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. So far, there is a lack of knowledge on the prevalence of inadequate asthma and associated characteristics. Objective: The primary objective is to determine the proportion of primary care patients with inadequate asthma control, as assessed during a regular control consultation with the general practice nurse. Study design: This is a non-interventional prospective observational study, taking place in a real-world primary care setting. The AsthmaOptimiser tool will be used during regular asthma consultations in primary care, which the healthcare provider will fill in together with the patient. The AsthmaOptimiser tool creates an overview of factors and characteristics that may be associated with uncontrolled asthma, and subsequently provides a guideline-based management suggestion. Additionally, we will perform qualitative interviews to collect experiences and perspectives of healthcare providers on their use of the AsthmaOptimiser tool, including, but not limited to, ease of use, points of improvement, and on their implementation of the management suggestions. Study population: Patients diagnosed with asthma, who attend a pre-planned primary care asthma review, are eligible to participate. A limited number of in- and exclusion criteria will be adopted, to make sure the research population closely resembles the real world. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with inadequate asthma control. Inadequate asthma control will be defined as an exacerbation in the past 4 weeks and/or an ACQ6 (i.e., Asthma Control Questionnaire) score >0.75.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of multiple-dose administration of lansoprazole on the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of JNJ-64417184 in healthy adult participants; and to evaluate the effect of time-separated, multiple-dose administration of famotidine on the single-dose PK of JNJ-64417184 in healthy adult participants (optional).
Introduction: Recently, the devastating consequences of neglected surgical care in global health became apparent with an estimated five billion people lacking access to safe surgical and anesthesia care. Traditionally, short-term surgical missions were the predominant strategy how surgical care was supported in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Although surgical missions have been criticized in recent literature they are still being performed on a large scale. The aim of this study is to provide recommendations for persons and organizations involved in surgical mission on how to strengthen surgical care in LMICs in the future. Method: An online survey was developed for members of foreign teams. Data was collected on 5 topics, consisting of: 1) basic characteristics of the missions, 2) main activities, 2) follow-up and reporting, 3) the local registration process for foreign teams and 4) collaboration with local stakeholders.
Phase angle, derived from bioimpedance analysis (BIA), reflects tissue quality and quantity in which cell mass, membrane integrity and hydration state are represented. Phase angle, as a measure of body composition, changes with the physical condition of patients and is associated with survival in several disease states and during ICU admission. Aim of the study is to explore the predictive value of the phase angle for long term ICU outcome.
SCOPE-PLUS is an optional substudy of the observational SCOPE Study (Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease among Older People across Europe, NCT02691546). The objective of the SCOPE-PLUS study is to derive new equations based on innovative and novel biomarkers of CKD function and compare its accuracy to measure GFR in the population older than 75 years.