There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to answer the following question: Leads a primary coagulation corrected with a single dose of fibrinogen concentrate after ascending aorta-arc reconstruction to a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions, compared to placebo?
BlueWind system safety and performance in treatment of patients diagnosed with overactive bladder (OAB)
A Phase I study to assess the systemic exposure, effiacy, and safety of 450 mg ceritinib taken with a low-fat meal and 600 mg ceritinib taken with a low-fat meal as compared with that of 750 mg ceritinib taken in the fasted state in adult patients with ALK rearranged (ALK-positive) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Background: Electroporation or electropermeabilisation is a novel technique with the potential to overcome the main disadvantages of thermal ablation. It utilizes electric pulses, traveling between two or more electrodes, to create 'nanopores' in the cell membrane. If the applied current reaches a certain threshold these 'nanopores' become permanent resulting in cell death. The use of electric current means that IRE is not susceptible to 'thermal sink' leading to consistent ablation results. IRE ablation targets the cell membrane, sparing tissue architecture and minimizing damage to blood vessels, nerves and the renal collecting system. The first in human studies have proven the safety of IRE for the ablation of small renal masses. However the efficacy of IRE through histopathological examination of an ablated renal tumour has not yet been studied, compromising the correct and scientific evaluation of this new technology. Primary Objectives: - To determine the efficacy of IRE ablation of renal masses , measured by histopathologic examination of the targeted tumour. - To determine the safety of IRE ablation of renal masses, by evaluating device and procedural adverse events. Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the efficacy of MRI in the imaging of ablation success, extend of the ablation zone, one and four weeks post IRE ablation. - To evaluate the efficacy of CEUS in the imaging of ablation success, extend of the ablation zone, one and four weeks post IRE ablation. Population: 10 patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with a solid enhancing mass, who are candidates for radical nephrectomy. Intervention: Eligible patients will receive IRE ablation of their renal mass 4 weeks prior to radical nephrectomy. Follow-up at one and four weeks post IRE will be performed using MRI and CEUS imaging. After radical nephrectomy histopathological examination will be performed to evaluate IRE ablation success.
The study will assess patients with at least one major AE related to treatment / hospitalization / immobilization in the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) group compared to the usual care group.
Patients with a history of blood clots are at risk of developing additional clots in the future. Doctors use a tool called a clinical decision rule to tell them how likely it is that a patient has a blood clot and if they should have further testing to look for the clot. This tool may cause doctors to over-diagnosis a recurrent clot because the symptoms may be left over from the previous clot. Correctly diagnosing a recurrent blood clot is very important since there are risks associated with both over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis. If a recurrent blood clot is missed (under-diagnosis) the patient is at risk of death from a clot in the lungs. If blood thinners are prescribed when they are not needed (over-diagnosis), the patient may have to take blood thinners for their lifetime and risk having serious bleeding.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy observed with canakinumab dose reduction in a subgroup of patients in the extension study CACZ885G2301E1.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the superiority of the glycopyrrolate bromide (CHF 5259 pMDI) versus placebo on top of QVAR® pMDI, in terms of lung functions parameters, as well as to assess its safety.
The overall objective is to assess the effect of once daily tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination compared to 5 µg tiotropium (both delivered with the Respimat® inhaler) on moderate to severe COPD exacerbation in patients with severe to very severe COPD.
This is a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study that will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of RG7625 in healthy male and female volunteers. The study will employ an interleaved cohort ('leapfrog') design in which dosing is alternated between two cohorts and each individual within a cohort will receive study drug dosing on four occasions - in effect giving a four treatment, four period, four-way crossover for each individual. The minimum duration for each participant is approximately 8 weeks.