There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Debio 1347 in terms of objective response rate (ORR) in participants with solid tumors harboring fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 gene fusion/rearrangement.
The goal of PROSPER-C is to study effectiveness of ImRs compared to integrated SFT-ImRs in treatment-seeking, adult patients with comorbid PTSD and Cluster C Personality Disorder (CPD).
The goal of PROSPER-B is to study effectiveness of EMDR compared to integrated DBT-EMDR in treatment-seeking, adult patients with comorbid PTSD and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).
This is a Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center study assessing the efficacy and safety of durvalumab with SoC SBRT versus placebo with SoC SBRT in patients with unresected clinical Stage I/II lymph node-negative (T1 to T3N0M0) NSCLC. An additional cohort will assess Osimertinib following SBRT in patients with early stage unresected T1 to T3N0M0 NSCLC harbouring an EGFR mutation.
Two-part Phase 1 study to assess the effect of single therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses of lucerastat on the QT/QTc interval duration in healthy subjects (Part A: Pilot study; Part B: TQT study)
Background: Current guidelines recommend that every person with Parkinson's disease (PD) should have access to Parkinson's Disease Nurse Specialist (PDNS) care. Thus, hospitals increasingly offer PDNS care to their patients with PD. However, there is currently little scientific evidence on the cost-effectiveness of PDNS care. Consequently, many hospitals lack the nursing capacity to offer PDNS care to all patients, which creates unequal access to care and possibly avoidable disability and costs. Objective: The investigators aim to study the (cost-)effectiveness of specialized nursing care provided by a PDNS as compared to no PDNS care for people with PD in all disease stages. To gain more insight into the used interventions and their effects, a subgroup analysis will be performed based on disease duration (diagnosis made <5, 5-10, or >10 years ago). Methods: The investigators will perform an 18-month, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial in eight community hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 240 people with idiopathic PD that have not been treated by a PDNS over the past two years will be included, independent of disease severity or duration. In each hospital, 30 patients will randomly be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either PDNS care according to the Dutch Guideline on PDNS care or no nursing intervention (continuing usual care). For the allocation of participants, a computer-generated list of random numbers will be used. The co-primary outcome measures are Quality of Life (QoL) and motor symptoms. Secondary outcomes include PD symptoms, mobility, non-motor symptoms, health-related quality of life, experienced quality of care, self-management, medication adherence, caregiver quality of life, coping skills and caregiver burden. Data will be collected after 12 months and 18 months. A healthcare utilization and productivity loss questionnaire will be completed every 3 months by both the patient and the caregiver. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that, by offering more patients access to PDNS care, QoL will increase with equal healthcare costs. Increasing direct medical costs (for nurse staffing) will be offset by a reduced number of consultations with the general practitioner and neurologist. If these outcomes are reached, wide implementation of PDNS care is needed.
This study evaluates the effect of bright light on postprandial blood glucose metabolism in obese subjects with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance.
Rationale: Anastomotic leakage (0% - 30%) is a severe complication after esophagectomy with mortality rates approximately ranging from 2% - 12%. In addition, it is associated with a prolonged ICU treatment and hospital stay. Anastomotic leakage severity is currently graded according to how it is treated (grade I: conservative treatment, grade II endoscopic or radiologic intervention and grade III surgical intervention). However, this scoring system cannot be used to guide decision making when anastomotic leakage is diagnosed in a clinical setting. Factors that may influence the severity of the anastomotic leakage are (amongst others) location of the anastomosis, estimated surface of the defect, estimated circumference of the defect, extent of contamination, degree of sepsis and time from diagnosis until therapy. However, little is known about to what extent these and other factors contribute to anastomotic leakage severity. In addition, there is a paucity of data on what leakage characteristics dictate the success of a specific treatment. Primary study objectives 1. To investigate what factors contribute to anastomotic leakage severity and to compose an evidence based anastomotic leakage severity score. 2. To investigate what anastomotic leakage characteristics are associated with success of different anastomotic leakage treatments and to compare the effectiveness of different initial anastomotic leakage treatments for leakages classified according to severity and leakage characteristics. Study design: International multicenter retrospective cohort study. Study population: Adult patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Cohort size: 1000-2000 patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcome parameter: 90 day mortality. Secondary outcome parameters: in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 180-day mortality, comprehensive complications index, total number of reinterventions, hospital and ICU length of stay, hospital related costs. Funding: Radboudumc
Non-invasive imaging of tumor PD-L1 expression with 89Zr-labeled durvalumab PET/CT predicts response to durvalumab.
Radioligand therapy (RLT) using Lu-177 labelled PSMA is a promising new therapeutic approach to treat metastatic prostate cancer. This tumor-specific treatment is directed against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which is overexpressed in prostate cancer cells. In the last few years, several lutetium-177 (177Lu, β emitter) labeled PSMA ligands have been developed and are currently applied to treat metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, there are no prospective studies published so far using this treatment approach in hormone sensitive setting. In this pilot study patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer who did not undergo hormonal treatment will be treated with Lu-177 PSMA-617.