There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether recombinant Alkaline Phosphatase (recAP) is effective and save, and to determine the most effective dose, in the treatment of patients with acute kidney injury caused by sepsis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nivolumab in previously treated (cohorts, A, B & C) or newly diagnosed (cohort D) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma participants.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a multimodal rehabilitation program effectively reduces functional disability in adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain, compared to care as usual.
The objective of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of the new Sentus OTW QP LV lead and Iperia ICD family. The study focuses on the safety and efficacy of the QP device system.
The study aimed to confirm long-term efficacy and safety of LCI699 for the treatment of patients with Cushing's disease. It was a pivotal trial which supported the registration of LCI699 for the treatment of patients with Cushing's disease in the US and the EU. This is a phase lll, multi-center, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study of LCI699 following a 24 week, single-arm, open-label dose titration and treatment period which evaluated the safety and efficacy of LCI699 for the treatment of patients with Cushing's disease.
This study is designed to investigate the absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of a single oral dose of radiolabeled [14C]-labeled RO5285119 in healthy male participants.
Rationale: The PneumRx RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil (RePneu LVR-coil) is a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment designed to compress the areas of lung parenchyma most damaged by emphysema. The LVRC treatment was found to be feasible, safe and effective in previous studies. However, patient-based outcomes besides quality of life questionnaires are hardly measured after intervention treatments for COPD. Furthermore, the exact underlying physiological mechanism of the LVR-coil treatment is unknown. Another aspect of the treatment which we to date do not fully understand is which group of patients benefit of the treatment and which group of patients do not, this knowing that the responder rate is already about 60%. Objective: The objectives of the study are to gain more knowledge on 1) the effect of the LVRC treatment on patient-based outcomes like physical activity, 2) the underlying physiological mechanism of the treatment, 3) the predictors of response to the treatment at baseline, and 4) on a targetted treatment number of coils to be placed per lung using lung compliance. Study design: This study is a non-randomised open label multi-center intervention study. Study population: The study population exists of adult patients with severe emphysema with no other treatment options left besides surgical procedures. Intervention: Bilateral bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with RePneu coils. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the change in physical activity between baseline and 3 months follow-up after the second treatment. The secondary endpoints are the changes between baseline and 3 months follow-up after the second treatment in: patient reported outcomes of the treatment, dynamic lung hyperinflation, static lung volumes, lung compliance, diaphragm function, lung perfusion, systemic inflammation and small airways function. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The LVR Coil has been designed to be as safe as possible. It was shown that the risks associated with the LVRC system are largely attributable to the bronchoscopic procedure itself rather than to the device per se. Therefore, it appears that the LVRC device itself does not appreciably increase the risk of serious adverse events beyond the risk of undergoing a bronchoscopy procedure or simply having emphysema. Currently, this treatment is not commercially available in the Netherlands and study participants will have to visit the hospital multiple times. Previous studies have shown that the treatment has beneficial effect for the patient, however not all patients respond. Part of this new study is to try to identify which group of patients respond to the treatment and which patients do not. Therefore, it is possible that a patient will not receive any benefits from the treatment.
Prospective, multicentric, single arm post market study to gather safety and effectiveness data on the CE Marked InnFocus MicroShunt (MIDI Arrow) device in primary open angle glaucoma patients
The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the adhesive wafer design on the products ability to fit to the body..
Objective of this First in Man study is to assess feasibility and safety of Qvanteq's bioactive coronary stent for treatment of stable coronary artery disease patients with de novo coronary artery stenosis in native vessels. The proprietary surface of Qvanteq's bioactive coronary stent improves the in-growth behavior of the stent in the treated vessel. In-vivo animal studies revealed fast in-growth (similar to BMS), which however is not resulting in excessive tissue overgrowth as observed in BMS but rather has an efficacy profile similar to drug-eluting stent (DES), meaning suppression of tissue overgrowth. This should reduce the risk of restenosis and thrombus formation despite the presence of a short term dual anti platelet therapy (DAPT). Furthermore, prolonged DAPT time as applied with current DES increases the bleeding risk of patients. The study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single arm study; conducted in up to 6 cardiology centers in CH and NL. In total, approx. 35 patients will be enrolled. All patients will be treated with the Qvanteq's bioactive coronary stent. Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 6 & 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo angiography assessment (QCA) and Optical Coherence Tomography investigation (OCT) at baseline and at 6 months follow-up. Baseline OCT should be performed after the successfully completed angiographic procedure (documentary OCT). 1 and 12 months clinical follow-ups are conducted via telephone. Primary Angiographic endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss at 6 months; assessed by off-line QCA. Primary OCT endpoint is mean neointimal thickness at 6 months; assessed by off-line OCT analysis.