There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study will evaluate if the Groningen Anti-Inflammatory Diet and the ileocolonic delivery of vitamin B2, B3 and C can positively influence the course of Crohn's disease and can positively alter the gut microbiome of Crohn's disease patients as well as healthy volunteers.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of KIN-2787 in adults with BRAF/NRAS-mutated advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate crovalimab for the treatment of a sickle cell pain crisis (also known as a VOE) that requires hospitalisation in adult and adolescent participants with SCD. The primary objective of this study is safety and will additionally evaluate pharmacokinetics (how crovalimab is processed by your body), pharmacodynamics (how your body reacts to crovalimab) and the preliminary efficacy of crovalimab compared with placebo.
This is a single group, treatment, Phase 3, open-label study to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) of avalglucosidase alfa in treatment-naïve male and female participants with IOPD. Study details include: - Study duration: Screening - up to 4 weeks; - Primary Analysis Period (PAP) - 52 weeks; - Extended Treatment Period (ETP) - 52 weeks; - Extended Long term Treatment Period (ELTP) - 104 weeks; 4-week follow-up period for a total study duration - up to 4.08 years. - Treatment duration: Up to 4 years - Visit frequency: every other week and potentially every week
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2/3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of BLU-263 + best supportive care (BSC) with placebo + BSC in patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not adequately controlled by BSC. Parts 1 and 2 will enroll patients with ISM. Patients enrolled in Part 1 or Part 2 will roll over onto Part 3 to receive treatment with BLU-263 in an open-label fashion following completion of the earlier Part. Part M will enroll patients with monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (mMCAS). The study also includes PK groups that will enroll patients with ISM.
Multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase 1/2 study on the safety and efficacy of the combination of NMS-03305293 and temozolomide (TMZ) in adult patients with diffuse gliomas (Phase 1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type glioblastoma (Phase 2) at first relapse.
Rationale: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown to improve the overall survival for patients with metastasized non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) but the optimal dosing and patient selection are still a matter of discussion. The pembrolizumab dose, for instance, may be reduced significantly without decreasing treatment efficacy. Furthermore, as approximately only half of all patients responds to treatment, there is an urgent need to develop (early) treatment response prediction markers to select those who benefit from treatment. Objective: Primary: to investigate the non-inferiority of pembrolizumab 75% versus pembrolizumab 100% in terms of overall survival. Secondary: to develop biomarkers that predict immunotherapy treatment response. Study design: An open label randomized non-inferiority study. Study population: 750 patients with NSCLC, eligible for treatment with pembrolizumab, in line with the current ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Intervention: Patients will be randomized to standard of care (100%) versus reduced dose (approx. 75%, depending on treatment schedule) pembrolizumab. Main study parameters/endpoints: One-year overall survival rate
STEREO is single-arm phase II study, which aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib combined with early locally ablative radiotherapy of all cancer sites in patients with synchronous oligo-metastatic (primary tumour and maximum 5 metastases) EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R) NSCLC. Eradication of all macroscopic cancer sites at the time of primary diagnosis by combined modality treatment is expected to decrease the risk of resistance development with only microscopic disease potentially remaining. This will result in an improvement of PFS and OS without added high-grade toxicity.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in adults in the United States.[1] In the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology anatomical non-invasive imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plays an important role in the diagnosis of the presence of CAD in patients without a history of CAD and a low to intermediate likelihood.[2] CCTA provides high accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease by visualizing the coronary artery lumen using an intravenous contrast agent.[3] However to determine the hemodynamical significance of CCTA-identified stenosis, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with or without functional testing is still required. [4] During the ICA as per protocol the complete coronary artery system is visualized again. In patients with abnormalities on CCTA in only one coronary artery, i.e. only the left coronary artery (LCA) or the right coronary artery (RCA), the ICA procedure might be simplified by 'ultraselectively' visualizing only the coronary artery of interest and refraining from angiographic visualization of the contralateral coronary artery without abnormalities on CCTA (with an excellent negative predictive value of 95-99%).[5-7] Such an ultraselective strategy might reduce procedure time, usage of catheters, complication risk and the amount of contrast agent and radiation exposure. A recent retrospective study in three hospitals in the Netherlands showed CCTA to be extremely accurate in predicting a normal contralateral coronary artery in patients with coronary artery disease limited to the left or right coronary artery. Therefore, a CCTA-guided ultraselective ICA approach would have been safe and feasible and would have led to a considerable decrease in procedure time and radiation exposure. However, the analysis was hampered by the retrospective design. The potential benefits in salvage of procedure time and radiation exposure might be overestimated and it turned out to be impossible to measure the effects on contrast use, catheter use and procedure costs. Moreover, in the retrospective study only a small portion of the study population had abnormalities in the right coronary artery, thereby questioning the results of this study to safely be extrapolated to this category of patients with abnormalities in the RCA. This dual-center prospective registry study is designed to answer these remaining questions and to further investigate the potential benefit of an ultraselective ICA approach.
Collect real-world post-market clinical follow-up data on patients treated with the GORE® VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface (VSX)