There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study will be conducted in 3 parts. A) compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of AZ-009 with that of a therapeutically-relevant dose of a commercially available apomorphine injector in healthy volunteers; B) ascending doses of active drug in healthy volunteers; and C) examine the tolerability, safety, and PK of AZ-009 in subjects with established Parkinson's disease.
The study is a randomised, cross-over, double blind, controlled trial in which study participants will visit the research facility on two occasions under fasting conditions with a washout period of one week. During each visit, study subjects will receive a test shake with phospholipid-bound choline or a control shake with choline added as a salt and DHA added separately. The two shakes will be given in randomised order and blood will be collected via a catheter before and up-to 6 hours after choline consumption. All study participants will receive a standardised evening meal prior to each study day and asked not to drink alcohol or perform heavy exercise the day before each study day. Study subjects are also asked to avoid choline rich products the day before each test day. Study participants are offered a meal after the test day.
This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 study of ABP 959 in participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.
This open-label, single arm study will evaluate the safety of obinutuzumab administered as a short duration infusion (SDI; target 90-minute infusion) during cycle 2 and from cycle 2 onwards in combination with chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). The study has two phases: in the first phase, participants will receive the first cycle of obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy (G-chemo) induction therapy as usual with the first three infusions of obinutuzumab (1000 mg) administered at the regular infusion rate on Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1. Phase 2 starts when participants who do not experience any Grade ≥ 3 infusion related reactions during the first cycle receive their first obintuzumab infusion given at the faster infusion rate in Cycle 2. For Cycle 2, Day 1 and all other following infusions (including maintenance), obinutuzumab will be administered at a faster infusion of 90-minute SDI, as long as the participant does not experience any Grade ≥ 3 infusion related reactions. The investigator is free to choose the chemotherapy for each participant (bendamustine, CHOP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone], or CVP [cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone]). The total number of cycles of G-chemo induction therapy and the cycles length depends on the chemotherapy chosen for each participant.
Elbasvir/grazoprevir (Zepatier®) is a once-daily tablet for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) GT1a, 1b or 4 infection containing the NS5A inhibitor elbasvir (ELB) 50 mg and the NS3/4A protease inhibitor grazoprevir (GZR) 100 mg. For patients with swallowing difficulties, administration of whole tablets can be problematic. In addition, HCV patients that are hospitalized (at intensive care units) due to severe illness (co-infections/ liver failure) might not be able to swallow medication. Therefore it is useful to know whether it is possible to administer ELB/GZR through a different route, like a feeding tube. In daily practice, information about the safety and efficacy of crushed tablets is lacking which might result in noncompliance, interruption or discontinuation of expensive HCV therapy. However, it is not recommended to interrupt treatment because there is no evidence about the efficacy of the therapy after discontinuation (and restarting). Currently, patients and healthcare professionals are crushing tablets without information about efficacy and safety. Depending on the biopharmaceutical characteristics of a drug formulation, crushing tablets can lead to altered pharmacokinetics of drugs. It is important to know whether pharmacokinetic parameters are influenced by crushing of tablets; both a decrease and an increase in exposure may occur. A decrease of the plasma concentrations of ELB and/or GZR potentially reduces the therapeutic effect of the drugs. Higher doses or switching to other HCV-drugs might be needed. In contrast, in case a higher Cmax and/or AUC occurs there might be an increased risk of toxicity. As a result, crushing the drug is a contra-indication based on the available data. Therefore this study will be conducted to investigate whether a crushed ELB/GZR tablet is bioequivalent to ELB/GZR as a whole tablet.
Rationale: Psoriasis (PsO) is a common inflammatory skin disease. Besides the skin, it is recognized that this disease can affect multiple domains such as nails, joints and entheses. About 30% of the patients with PsO will develop symptoms in the musculoskeletal domains. Untreated inflammation in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can lead to irreversible joint damage and further reduces quality of life. Since musculoskeletal involvement is often preceded by the dermatological symptoms of PsO, patients with pure cutaneous psoriasis (PsC) should be routinely screened for joint involvement. Current screening questionnaires, like the often used Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), offer a moderate discrimination between patients with PsA and PsC at best. Our aim is to assert the prevalence of known and previously undiagnosed PsA in a PsC cohort. By comparing the gathered data of the PsA and PsC patients, we hope to improve the screening of PsC patients, and to reduce both undertreatment of locomotor symptoms as well as unnecessary diagnostic investigations. Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of PsA in a tertiary PsO cohort. Secondary objectives will be to ascertain the clinical features of these patients. With these features we want to find clinical, laboratory or genetic markers to predict the presence of PsA in PsO patients. Moreover, we wish to establish the added value of PsA screening for the quality of life (QoL) of PsO patients. Study design: Multicenter cross-sectional study with a single follow-up visit after 1 year. Patients will be screened at baseline for PsA symptoms by a rheumatology resident and referred to a rheumatology clinic if deemed necessary. At baseline, several clinical and sociodemographic parameters will be assessed. We will collect blood samples for diverse biochemical studies and genomic DNA. Patients will be followed for 1 year after active screening for PsA. Quality of life (QoL) and treatment change will be recorded after this period, to assess the effect of screening and referral.
Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is the mechanism by which the brain vasculature maintains constancy of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Reliable direct measurements of CBF at different blood pressure levels are difficult because they are invasive and time-consuming. This type of measurement to quantify CA is generally referred to as static cerebral autoregulation (sCA). Alternatively, it is possible to measure CA indirectly from blood pressure oscillations. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) measures how quickly the cerebral vessels react to a change in blood pressure to normalize CBF. Since the introduction of transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), it has become possible to estimate CBF velocity relatively easy, which in turn correlates well with CBF changes. This method is widely used to quantify dCA. However, it is not clear how sCA correlates with dCA over a range of physiologic mean blood pressure (MBP). It is important to compare different methods of assessing CA, because impaired CA may result in increased risk of perioperative complications such as stroke. In this study, the investigators were interested in establishing the relationship between sCA and dCA during surgery under general anesthesia. The investigators aim to compare these methods during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.
The XIENCE 28 USA Study is prospective, single arm, multi-center, open label, non-randomized trial to evaluate safety of 1-month (as short as 28 days) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in subjects at high risk of bleeding (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the approved XIENCE family (XIENCE Xpedition Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS], XIENCE Alpine EECSS and XIENCE Sierra EECSS) of coronary drug-eluting stents.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate comparability of the ORR in patients with previously untreated, advanced stage FL who receive GP2013-treatment to patients who receive MabThera-treatment.
The study will investigate the effect of rifampicin on the uptake and breakdown of ACT-246475 in healthy subjects