There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Invasive intracranial pressure monitoring takes on essential importance in patients with traumatic brain injury and in all cerebral pathologies in which intracranial hypertension is the main cause of death. Prolonged Intracranial Hypertension has been related to poor outcome and its occurrence has therefore to be assessed as soon as possible. Invasive intracranial pressure monitoring performed by placing an intracerebral catheter is currently the gold standard technique for continuous ICP invasive monitoring. This maneuver has usually been performed by neurosurgeons, but recently this procedure has more often been carried out by intensivists, at the bedside. Management of intracranial pressure handling and treatment is currently achieved by joint decisions between neurosurgeons and intensive care physicians, but differences in logistic matters and in the executive availability could impact on the dose of intracranial pressure to which patient is exposed. The aim of this study is to compare timing of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring placement performed by intensive care physicians and neurosurgeons and to detect possible differences in the incidence of complications between the two groups.
Prospective cohort study on pregnant women discharged from the hospital after the first episode of threatened preterm labor. Cervical length (CL) will be measured with transvaginal US upon initial presentation (i.e at the time of hospital admission), at the time of hospital discharge, and respectively 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks later. Pregnant women undelivered after the 1st episode of threatened preterm labor will be invited to participate in the study if CL upon discharge is < 25 mm. The study will investigate the potential association between cervical shortening over time and time of delivery, to assess if spontaneous preterm delivery can be predicted by CL.
While surgery is considered the only potentially curative therapy for pancreatic cancer, 5-year overall survival (OS) is typically <25%. Following surgical resection of pancreatic cancer, adjuvant conventionally fractionated RT (CRT, delivering 45-54 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) with 5-FU chemotherapy is recommended in high-risk patients (positive lymph nodes and/or R1-R2 resection margin status). However, the benefit of CRT in this setting is controversial due to lack of prospective positive data. Moreover, duration of treatment course (delaying initiation of more effective chemotherapy schedules), insufficient dose delivery due potential radiation-related severe toxicity to proximity organs represents a serious limitation to treatment efficacy. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel radiotherapy technique consisting of highly focused irradiation with a steep dose gradient, thus allowing the delivery of ablative radiation doses and significant sparing of proximity critical structures. Higher doses per fraction allows for more intensive treatments and shorter duration of the radiation course.
The present trial intends to assess the diagnostic accuracy of symphysis fundal height (SFH) as opposed to SFH combined with point of care ultrasound to measure the fetal abdominal circumference (POC-US-AC) in identifying small and large for gestational age infants (SGA and LGA infants) among low-risk pregnant women cared for by midwives after 35 weeks' gestation. Low risk pregnancies will be evaluated at 35-38, 40, 41, and 41+ weeks' gestation by midwives trained in SFH measurement and POC-US. Formal obstetric US performed by a perinatologist (i.e high risk obstetrician) will be performed in case SFH and/or POC-US suspect fetal growth or amniotic fluid abnormalities. Prenatal evaluations will be compared to actual birthweights.
The pressure reactivity index (PRx) has emerged as a surrogate method for the continuous bedside estimation of global cerebral autoregulation and a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes. However, calculations require continuous, high-resolution monitoring and are currently limited to specialized ICUs with dedicated software. To overcome this problem, new indices calculated using one-minute average data, instead of 10-second average data as performed by the PRx, have been proposed. The study aims to test new physiological indices appropriately modified to adapt to the scarcity of output data generated by standard hospital systems (frequency ~0.0033 Hz, approximately a 5-minute period) and to evaluate their association with outcome measures.
A clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of savolitinib plus durvalumab versus sunitinib in MET-driven (hepatocyte growth factor receptor), unresectable and locally advanced or metastatic PRCC (Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma).
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat women who have hot flashes after women have been through the menopause. Hot flashes are caused by the hormonal changes that happen when a woman's body has been through the menopause. Menopause is when women stop having a menstrual cycle, also called a period. During the menopause, the ovaries increasingly produce less sex hormones as a result of the natural ageing process and related hormonal adjustments. The decline in hormone production can lead to various symptoms which, in some cases, can have a very adverse effect on a menopausal woman's quality of life. The study treatment, elinzanetant, was developed to treat symptoms caused by hormonal changes. It works by blocking a protein called neurokinin from sending signals to other parts of the body, which is thought to play a role in starting hot flashes. There are treatments for hot flashes in women who have been through the menopause, but may cause medical problems for some people. In this study, the researchers will learn how well elinzanetant works compared to a placebo in women who have been through the menopause and have hot flashes. A placebo looks like a treatment but does not have any medicine in it. To compare these study treatments, the doctors will ask the participants to record information about the participants' hot flashes in an electronic diary. The researchers will study the number of hot flashes the participants have and how severe the hot flashes are. The researchers will look at the results from before treatment, after 4 weeks, and after 12 weeks of treatment. The participants in this study will take two capsules of either elinzanetant or the placebo once a day. The participants who take elinzanetant will take it for 26 weeks. The participants who take the placebo will take it for 12 weeks and then take elinzanetant for the next 14 weeks. During the study, the participants will visit the site approximately 9 times and perform 1 visit by phone. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 36 weeks. The treatment duration will be 26 weeks. During the study, the participants will: - record information about the participants' hot flashes in an electronic diary - answer questions about the participants' symptoms The doctors will: - check the participants' health - take blood samples - ask the participants questions about what medicines the participants are taking and if the participants are having adverse events An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if doctors do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
PICCOLO (IMGN853-0419) is a Phase 2 multicenter, open label study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in participants with platinum-sensitive ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers with high folate receptor-alpha (FRĪ±) expression.
Improvement of patients' care and outcome is largely based on development and validation of drugs and technologies, especially in rapidly evolving fields as Interventional Cardiology. In fact, even though the optimal efficiency of a cathlab can be influenced by Interventional Cardiologist's mental workload, stress' accumulation and performance, little if any attention is paid to the monitoring and optimization of his/her mental status. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based neural-interfaces are able to estimate workload, fatigue and the degree of sleepiness through spectral analysis techniques. In particular, the amplitude of alpha waves is a widely validated indicator of mental engagement's level. Developing a low cost and highly feasible device to monitor and analyze operator's mental engagement level and performance could be extremely appealing, especially considering both the lack of data in literature for interventional disciplines and the recent technology developments.
Rationale Although the majority of asthma patients can be effectively treated with currently available medications, a substantial subset remains severe, causing a considerable proportion of resource expenditure. Severe asthma is now widely accepted to be a heterogeneous syndrome consisting of multiple phenotypes identified by specific biomarkers and targeted by tailored biological therapies. However, much remains unclear regarding the best approaches to manage these patients, or concerning the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease. Small airways (SA) are defined as those airways with an internal diameter <2 mm. In patients affected by asthma, it has been reported that SA are the predominant site of airflow resistance. Peripheral airways are thickened in asthma due to chronic inflammation in the epithelium, submucosa and muscle area. It has been suggested that the outer wall is more inflamed than the inner wall, with a higher number of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils associated to an increased mRNA expression of interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5 and eotaxin. Moreover, it is well documented that SA inflammation and dysfunction contributes significantly to the clinical impact of asthma and that 50-60% of asthmatics have a SA involvement across all disease severities. An important question is whether SA disease in asthma is variable among distinct asthma phenotypes and whether it occurs in all patients. Cluster analyses have been recently used to identify specific asthma phenotypes, but markers of SA function have not been investigated. However, evidence is accumulating to support the concept that SA dysfunction and inflammation may contribute to distinct asthma phenotypes. Recent findings indicate that SA are significantly affected in severe asthma and that their involvement is associated with worse disease outcomes. It has been reported that patients with asthma and a history of frequent exacerbations per year had a significant SA involvement Furthermore, peripheral airways significantly contribute not only to the level of asthma control, but also to patients' quality of life and perception of symptoms. At last more thickened SA and higher numbers of eosinophils are detectable in subjects with fatal asthma. The assessment of SA represents a big challenge and requires qualified expertise and sophisticated techniques including body plethysmography, single and multiple breath nitrogen washout, impulse oscillometry (IOS), fraction exhaled NO at multiflow, sputum induction and high-resolution chest CT (HRCT). Such procedures can either provide functional information on the degree/extent of ventilation heterogeneity and air trapping or facilitate the understanding of the inflammatory and remodeling processes. These measures are not usually part of the evaluation of asthmatic patients and in the monitoring of the effects of drugs recommended for severe asthma. Mepolizumab represents an innovative weapon for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. In most of these patients the drug controls inflammation, improves lung function, ameliorates clinical symptoms, reduces exacerbations and has a marked steroid-sparing effect. However, there is still a significant proportion of non-responders and a lack of validated predictive biomarkers in such subpopulation. In regard to this, very limited findings are available about the effect of mepolizumab on SA. At the best of our knowledge, the only paper available in literature, addressing the topic, is the study of Farah and co-workers. The authors found that an early improvement in SA function was associated with better asthma control and represented a significant contributor to the therapeutic response. However, the study was conducted in a limited cohort of patients, assessing SA only through multi breath nitrogen washout, and not considering the relationship between SA disease and levels of peripheral/sputum eosinophils. Also, a study was recently initiated at the Hopitaux de Paris to evaluate airway remodelling during mepolizumab treatment (REMOMEPO, NCT03797404). A better definition of severe asthma phenotypes and endotypes, as well as the identification of novel disease targets and biomarkers to predict treatment response and monitor efficacy and safety of biological drugs over time, would favor a Precision Medicine approach translating in both improved disease management and reduced healthcare costs and social burdens. This is considered a crucial unmet need and further research in the field is strongly recommended by international guidelines, respiratory scientific societies, healthcare systems and regulatory boards.