There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Quizartinib is an experimental drug. It is not approved for regular use. It can only be used in medical research. Children or young adults with a certain kind of blood cancer (FLT3-ITD AML) might be able to join this study if it has come back after remission or is not responding to treatment.
This trial will compare an Implicit Learning Approach (ILA) to usual care, during the rehabilitation of mobility post stroke. It is a multicentre, assessor blind, cluster randomised controlled pilot trial, with embedded feasibility study. It also includes a nested qualitative evaluation, designed to explore the views of participants and therapists.
This investigation is a mixed methods research proposal to answer the question: 'Does Using the Pain Toolkit Improve Outcomes for Patients accessing the North of England Regional Back Pain Pathway?'. The study is part of a 5 year professional doctorate programme at Teesside University. The aim of the study is to test whether with a double blind randomised controlled trial patients accessing the North of England Regional Back Pain Pathway experience reduced Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) when using the pain toolkit compared to a control group of patients offered the standard treatment. The study also contains a nested qualitative element which aims to explore the participants' experiences of using the Pain Toolkit. According to the British Pain Society (2017), chronic pain management is a significant burden to the National Health Service NHS. Back pain alone accounts for a significant disease burden and loss in productivity among working people (Al Mazroa 2013 and TUC 2008). Commissioners must justify their expenditure on health services to the local population and therefore for an area such as pain management where there is significant disease prevalence (WHO 2013) and significant costs, potential service developments should be considered. The development of the pain toolkit (Pain Toolkit 2017a) as a straightforward, easy to use self-management option offers a potentially cost effective support mechanism for patients but as yet there is no evidence to support its use in clinical practice. This study aims to fill that knowledge gap.
Bronchiectasis is a complex heterogeneous disorder. Treatment is challenging and many recent randomized controlled trials have been negative. It is believed that bronchiectasis as a broad diagnosis incorporates multiple different patient subgroups (also known as phenotypes) and molecular entities (referred to as endotypes). This study aims to phenotype and endotype bronchiectasis during stable disease and exacerbations, to develop strategies for personalised medicine. Primary Objective To determine molecular endotypes of bronchiectasis which can guide response to treatment. Secondary Objectives 1. To determine molecular endotypes of stable bronchiectasis 2. To determine the causes and inflammatory profiles of bronchiectasis exacerbations 3. To validate candidate biomarkers of stable and exacerbation endotypes to use in stratified medicine 4. To perform in-vivo or in-vitro proof of concept studies using phenotypic data to identify patient populations likely to benefit in future randomized controlled trials This is an observational cohort study that will aim to identify patient subgroups and link these with meaningful clinical outcomes.
Open maternal-fetal surgery is currently used on fetuses with myelomeningocele (MMC). Fetoscopic or minimal access fetal surgery is also being used to treat fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Following accurate diagnosis of a congenital malformation such as MMC or CDH, prospective parents face a range of uncertainties regarding the future of their unborn child, and the options provided require major ethical considerations. In the situation under study, termination of pregnancy may be for some parents an alternative option to expectant prenatal management. Fetal therapy provides a tantalising third option for some, where procedures are undertaken to reduce the likelihood of a more complicated neonatal course, potentially improving long term outcome, but at risk of amniotic fluid leakage, infection and most importantly very preterm delivery, itself associated with significant neonatal mortality and morbidity and long-term consequences. Balancing these competing risks is challenging. For an intervention to be effective it also needs to be acceptable to women and their families. "Acceptability" can be defined as a multi-faceted construct that reflects the extent to which people delivering or receiving a healthcare intervention consider it to be appropriate, based on anticipated or experienced cognitive and emotional responses to the intervention. With this study it is the aim to assess how women (and their partners) perceive the acceptability of a fetal surgical intervention for MMC and CDH. Participants will be asked to share their thoughts, views, feelings and experiences with regards to the decision to participate in fetal surgery. Data are collected by the use of in-depth face-to-face interviews. In-depth interviews are used to understand the participant's perspectives and perceptions of a situation they are in. It explicitly includes participants interpretation and understanding of an event The interviews will be held in two or three moments in time (for parents opting for fetal surgery, there will be one additional interview, after the intervention while admitted in hospital): after counselling for options, but before eventual intervention; for intervention group shortly after the intervention, and 12 weeks after birth of the baby, or termination of pregnancy.
The study seeks to investigate safety and efficacy of ixazomib (NINLARO), a proteasome inhibitor, in multiple sclerosis (MS). Participants will receive either ixazomib capsules or placebo capsules for up to 24 months.
An observational, non-interventional registry study to collect real-world data from people living with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) and its treatment, which will be available to researchers to further the knowledge of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and improve patient care.
Aims: To explore the clinical effect on exercise tolerance and quality of life, safety and tolerability of pacing at higher outputs in patients with chronic heart failure and a pacemaker. Background: Heart failure (HF) is a very common condition of breathlessness or fatigue associated with heart muscle weakness. In around 30% of people with HF, a pacemaker-based treatment known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve symptoms and prognosis by retuning the timing of the contraction of the heart. However, the effect of CRT is variable and unpredictable, with around 1 in 3 of people obtaining no obvious symptomatic benefit. One of the reasons for this might be that the pacemaker pulse does not activate all of the heart muscle cells at the same time or at all. In order to provide the longest possible battery life span, the default programming for all pacemakers is to provide a stimulus at an arbitrary level above the capture threshold (at which the spike leads to contraction). Whilst this is reasonable in a normal heart where the aim is to treat a slow heart rate, in heart failure, where the aim is to retune all parts of the heart, it is possible that this is not enough to provide consistent contraction of all heart muscle cells. It is possible that providing a higher output electrical signal from the pacemaker will activate more of the heart muscle cells immediately and thereby improve the contraction of the heart. The investigators think that this might be important at rest, but even more important during activity. This concept has never been tested before in a systematic manner but could have large implications for people with heart failure and existing CRT devices which could simply be reprogrammed to derive greater benefits for patients during everyday activities. Design: The proposed project has two parts: Study 1 - 105 patients with a CRT pacemaker for heart failure but ongoing symptoms will be invited to attend the National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Facility. Symptoms, medication, hospitalisation information will be collected and a heart ultrasound scan using the pacemaker to increase the heart rate will be done to describe the force frequency relationship. Patients will perform a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Of these patients, 40 will be invited to return for two further visits, to perform an exercise test each time with the pacemaker programmed to its usual output or high output pacing. At each visit, including the heart scans, the order of the programming will be random, and neither the observer nor the patient will know how the device has been programmed. Study 2 - 70 patients will be invited to participate in a longer term study of whether high output pacing is safe, well tolerated and has effects on walk time (on a treadmill) and heart pumping function. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: high output or standard pacemaker settings. In the high output group, the pacemaker will be programmed to deliver the highest output possible or tolerated. In the standard care group patients will have standard output settings.
The prognostic relevance of isolated non-ischemic LGE (i.e. with no underlying "labelled" cardiomyopathy) is unclear, and current guidelines to not state on the clearance of athlete with this type of findings as regards to competitive or intense sport practice. The principal objective of the study is to evaluate during a five-years follow up, the clinical outcome of athletes with this kind of findings. The secondary objective is the determination of prognostic factors. The management and follow-up of the athletes will be let at the appraisal of each center.
Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis remains a challenge due to non-specific signs and diagnostic inaccuracies. Studies have shown that this could lead to overdiagnosis and overuse of antibiotic treatment, with potential long-term adverse effects. A systems approach towards diagnosing neonatal sepsis has been shown to have high accuracy in initial studies. This study aims to recruit a large validation cohort to confirm findings.