There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of elexacaftor (ELX) / tezacaftor (TEZ) / ivacaftor (IVA) triple combination (TC) in subjects 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function (MF) mutation (F/MF genotypes).
The investigators want to study how the exposure to the covid-19 pandemic affects attitudes towards science and vaccination, and how other general attitudes and values are affected.
This observational study is designed to assess whether focused lung ultrasound examination can improve the diagnosis of COVID-19 lung disease and/or make an alternative diagnosis at a patient's initial hospital presentation. For patients with confirmed COVID-19 the study will also assess whether surveillance lung ultrasound examination can predict clinical outcome over the course of their hospital admission.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda in reducing symptoms of flu like illness during the Covid 19 outbreak.
This is a phase 1 study in healthy subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single (Part A and B) and multiple (Part B) doses of inhaled TD-0903.
This is an international, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, study in hospitalized adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, India, Canada, and United Kingdom. The study is evaluating the effect of dapagliflozin 10 milligrams versus placebo, given once daily for 30 days in addition to background local standard of care therapy, on reducing complications and all-cause mortality, or improving clinical recovery.
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort study to assess safety and efficacy of CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with small cell lung cancer or squamous non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after 1 or 2 lines of therapies. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the overall response rate of subjects treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab in three cohorts: - Cohort A: SCLC in ICI naïve subjects - Cohort B: SCLC in ICI progressor subjects - Cohort C: sqNSCLC in ICI progressor subjects Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects in the treated population who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. In Cohort A, expected ORR for nivolumab monotherapy is 14% while target ORR is 30%. To achieve at least 80% power with one-sided type 1 error 0.1, 39 subjects will be enrolled according to a 2-stage group sequential design based on a binomial test. In stage 1, 12 subjects will be enrolled and treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab. If there are 2 or more subjects responding, Cohort A will continue to enroll an additional 27 subjects. If 1 or less subjects respond in stage 1, Cohort A will stop for futility. In Cohort B and C, expected ORR for nivolumab monotherapy is 5% while target ORR is 15%. To achieve at least 80% power with one-sided type 1 error 0.1, 48 subjects will be enrolled according to a 2-stage group sequential design based on a binomial test. In stage 1, 14 subjects will be enrolled and treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab. If there are 1 or more subjects responding, Cohort B and C will continue to enroll an additional 34 subjects each. If 0 subjects respond in stage 1, Cohort B and C will stop for futility.
Electrosurgery allows for dissection with simultaneous haemostasis. One of its disadvantages is that the heat production can cause injury to the surrounding tissue which may result in wound healing problems and an increased rate of seromas. The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ (PPB) is a new electrosurgery device which may overcome this by having the ability to operate on a lower temperature, therefore reducing collateral thermal damage. Different experimental studies in both animal and human models comparing the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ and other surgical dissection devices for incisions have shown a reduction in width of zone of thermal injury, reduction in wound inflammation, increased wound strength and reduced scaring in favour of the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ and comparable to scalpel incisions. A prospective clinical study published by Dogan et al. in 2013, including 46 consecutive breast cancer patients receiving a modified radical mastectomy either with the conventional diathermy (n=22) or the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ (n=24), showed a statistically significant reduction in wound fluid production (p=0.025), leading to earlier drain removal (p=0.020) in the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ group. Comparable to oncological breast surgery, prolonged drain requirements for high wound fluid production and seromas are often experienced in the abdominal donor side after deep inferior epigastric perforator/ muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (DIEP/MS-TRAM) breast reconstruction. To evaluate the effects of the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ for abdominal dissection in autologous breast reconstruction on wound fluid production and complications such a seroma, this double blinded randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted. It was hypothesised the use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ for the harvest of the DIEP/ MS-TRAM flap would result in 1) a shorter abdominal drains requirement (days); 2) a lower total drainage volume (mL) from the abdominal drains; 3) lower levels of inflammatory cytokines in the drain fluid and 4) less and smaller seromas would be identified using ultrasound in the follow-up period.
The aim of the project is to investigate opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in a real world / diverse group of patients with cancer. The objectives of the project are to determine: a) prevalence of OIC; b) clinical features / impact of OIC; c) management of OIC.
There are no agreed endoscopic signs for the diagnosis of villous atrophy(VA) in coeliac disease(CD), necessitating biopsies and for both diagnosis and exclusion. Here we evaluated the role of near focus Narrow Band Imaging(NF-NBI) for the assessment of villous architecture in suspected CD with development and further validation of a novel NF-NBI classification.