There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
As the population continues to age, the prevalence of spinal deformity surgery for older patients is increasing. Questions regarding the suitability of these patients to undergo large spinal procedures and whether the outcomes merit the risks involved are not well known.
In this project, individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease who are looking to lose weight or increase your level of activity, are offered access to an online lifestyle management program. Participants will use the website daily to improve their eating and exercise habits as well as other aspects of healthy living. They will be asked to participate in online challenges to motivate them to make lifestyle changes. Participants will meet with a health professional 3 times within the 6 month time period as well as receive monthly guidance and support by phone or email for the website.
This study will compare three treatment regimens containing metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and compare their effects on tumor response and associated side effects, to determine if one therapy is better than the other for people diagnosed with relapsed or persistent neuroblastoma.
This study will ultimately aim to evaluate the side effects of treatment by asking 20 subjects to receive post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer with the treatment plan adapted after the first week of treatment to account for changes in the target shape. These patients will be asked to complete toxicity scores and a quality of life questionnaire at the start and completion of treatment, and at 3 months 1, 2 and 5 years from the start of radiotherapy. These results will be used to determine the feasibility of the proposed approach, and obtain early estimates of improvements in uncertainty margin requirements for this population of patients.
This is an open-label, single group study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of atazanavir 300 mg daily boosted with ritonavir 100mg daily in HIV-infected patients over a period of 9 days. Ritonavir and atazanavir are protease inhibitors used to treat HIV. However, ritonavir, when used at low doses (up to 100mg) does not have HIV activity, but will enhance (boost) the blood concentrations of other drugs like atazanavir. Recently, a study showed that taking 50mg of ritonavir administered in an oral solution led to similar blood concentrations of atazanavir than when given with 100mg of ritonavir. Potential benefits associated with a lower dose of ritonavir may include a reduction of side effects such as upset stomach and an improvement in cholesterol level. This study will look at the amount of atazanavir into your blood when given with ritonavir in a tablet formulation at 50mg or 100mg with standard atazanavir dose (300mg).
Nerves are made of different fats including omega-3s and omega-6s; however, dietary intakes of omega-6s are very high and omega-3 intakes are very low. We hypothesize that omega-3 supplementation will stop diabetes related changes in cornea nerve structure in patients with type 1 diabetes to stop the development of nerve injury associated with future risk of neuropathy, and reflect changes in the degree of nerve injury over time. As such, we anticipate that patients in the study will maintain Corneal Nerve Fiber Length (CNFL), the primary outcome measure.
This was a Phase II, open-label, non-randomized, multi-center study of oral dabrafenib in combination with oral trametinib in subjects with rare cancers harboring the BRAF V600E mutation including anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), biliary tract cancer (BTC), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), low grade (WHO G1/G2) glioma (LGG), high grade (WHO G3/G4) glioma (HGG), non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) / non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (ASI), hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and multiple myeloma (MM).
Initiatives aimed at reducing Emergency Department (ED) wait times and improved community health initiatives are major priorities in Canada. Three of the most common chronic diseases worldwide are Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). These diseases are on the rise and currently cost the Canadian health care system billions of dollars every year including the cost of hospitalizations and ED visits. The existing health care system does not have the resources and manpower to effectively care for these patients in the future. Paramedics are currently employed to provide Emergency Medical Services in remote, rural and urban settings in Canada. They are highly trained health care practitioners that are mobile in the community and currently work in a physician medically delegated act model and therefore are positioned to take on new collaborative roles to deliver patient care in the community setting. Increased community paramedic care could decrease the utilization of the health care system resources for patients with chronic disease. Using a randomized control trial design we will attempt to answer the question of whether whether non-emergency community paramedics conducting home visits to undertake assessments and evidence-based treatments of patients in partnership with family doctors will decrease the rate of patient hospitalization.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects on urothelial cancer of nab-paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel to treat this disease. This research is being done because currently there is no effective treatment for urothelial cancer that has progressed after prior chemotherapy.
The investigators hypothesize that intra-nasal ketamine, for analgesia of patients with moderate to severe pain in an alpine setting, will provide a clinically significant reduction in pain and provide an effective and feasible alternative to intravenous opioids. The investigators wish to know: 1. Is our study protocol feasible to study INK in a mountain, prehospital care environment? 2. What estimate can be made of recruitment rates? 3. Does studying the use of INK interfere with or delay care at Whistler/Blackcomb? 4. Is intra-nasal ketamine an effective and safe method for controlling pain in our study population and setting? 5. Does intranasal ketamine provide a clinically significant reduction in pain or do patients require additional IV narcotics for extraction? 6. Are there any significant changes in vital signs after administration of intra-nasal ketamine 7. Does the use of intra-nasal ketamine reduce time of patient extraction and transport in the alpine pre-hospital setting? 8. Are there any long term sequelae of INK at one week?