There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
According to the Canadian Cancer Society there are approximately 1700 new cases of esophageal cancer per year in Canada. As most of these patients are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, 1800 deaths are estimated from this cancer annually . Progressive dysphagia is the most common presenting symptom and impacts not only the patient's quality of life but the ability to tolerate life prolonging treatments such as systemic chemotherapy. Although there are several therapeutic modalities to alleviate malignant dysphagia including laser, photodynamic therapy and cryotherapy , the use of stents and radiotherapy are the most commonly employed. However, the optimal approach to effective, timely treatment of malignant dysphagia remains a challenge. The investigators conducted a preliminary retrospective review to investigate such palliation procedures and found that a multi-modality approach may yield the most favourable results . Therefore, our clinical trial will examine the effectiveness of adding a single dose of brachytherapy to patients with severe dysphagia who have already been treated with a endoscopically placed self-expanding metallic stent.
This is an open-label study to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy and tolerability of SSP-004184AQ. The study consists of two phases: the pharmacokinetic phase, using a single 16 mg/kg dose of SSP-004184AQ; and the chronic dosing phase, during which patients will receive an additional 48 weeks of SSP-004184AQ dosing. Two age groups will be studied: 6-<12, and 12-<18 years old. The study is designed to initially assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of SSP-004184AQ in older children (adolescents, 12-<18 years old) and then if deemed safe, in younger children (6-<12 years old).
Most individuals with major depressive disorder manifest clinically significant agitation. Concurrent agitation in a depressed individual is associated with an intensification of mood symptoms, decreased probability of recovery, increased recurrence risk, suicidality, and increased medical-service utilization. The occurrence of anxiety/agitation phenomenology in the depressed patient often invites the need for augmentation strategies (e.g. atypical antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, etc.) and complicated polypharmacy regimens. Moreover, individuals with major depressive disorder often report worsening of symptom severity, irritability, hostility, dysphoria, and significant subjective distress (This response pattern is similar to individuals with bipolar disorder). Results from large research studies provide evidence indicating that quetiapine is capable of offering clinically significant multidimensional symptom relief in bipolar depression. Moreover, results from several trials in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder have established the efficacy of quetiapine therapy for unipolar depression and anxiety syndromes. So far, no atypical antipsychotic agent has been evaluated specifically for the treatment of agitated depression. In this study, it is hypothesized that persons with major depressive disorder and prominent agitation (i.e. agitated depression) will exhibit a more favourable response and tolerability profile to quetiapine XR when compared to escitalopram.
- Approximately 30% of all patients with cancer report levels of psychological distress indicative of the need for psychological intervention. - Research suggests that learning more adaptive coping strategies improves psychological adjustment to cancer. - It is imperative to develop cost-efficient, feasible psychosocial interventions. - The aim is to test the efficacy of the self administered format of a psycho-educational intervention (NUCARE) in reducing distress and enhancing adaptive coping strategies for cancer patients. It is hypothesized that: - patients would show significant reductions in distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) over the 6-week treatment period, and that treatment would produce superior results compared to wait-list; patients would maintain or even increase their improvement up to 3 months following treatment. - the treatment would enhance more adaptive coping strategies. - greater self-reported adherence to the treatment/homework would be associated with symptom improvement, more autonomous self-regulation and higher perceived competence for adhering to the coping intervention program.
Osteoarthritis disables approximately 10% of people who are 60 years or older and compromises the quality of life of more than 20 million Americans every year. Osteoarthritis is caused by the breakdown of cartilage that lines the bones at your joints from daily wear and tear and results in pain and restricted function. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total hip replacement, is currently one of the most successful and cost-effective treatments used to eliminate pain and restore function in those suffering from osteoarthritis. There are multiple ways to perform a THA. The main difference between each type is the point of incision in relation to a muscle on the outer surface of your hip bone: gluteus medius. The incision performed can be anterior (in front of the muscle), anterolateral (in front and to the side of the muscle), or posterior (from the back). Each of these approaches has its own advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence available that makes one better than the other. The purpose of this study is to determine which of the three approaches to THA is the most effective. The main outcome that will determine the most effective approach is the functional ability of the patients included in this study at 52 weeks. The investigators will also compare whether the patient's: length of hospital stay, use of assistive devices, need for revision surgery, ability to return to work, ability to relieve pain, complication rate, and quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that the anterior approach will be the most effective approach in reducing the rate of post-operative complications after THA.
The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of Autologous Muscle-derived Cells (AMDC; a preparation of a patient's own cells) as a treatment for patients with advanced heart failure caused by ischemia.
When Vitamin D replacement is initiated in patients with history of urolithiasis, there will be higher incidence of hypercalciuria but with careful follow-up of these patients, hypercalciuria could be appropriately managed with thiazide diuretics so that the risk of newly diagnosed renal stones will be equivalent to control groups without Vitamin D replacements.the purpose of the study is to determine the effect of vitamin D replacement in patients with previous history of urolithiasis presenting to a tertiary stone clinic in terms of changes in 24-hour urine collection parameters and to evaluate the lithogenic effect of vitamin D replacement in terms of development of urolithiasis. Eighty-six eligible patients will be included in terms of having suboptimal vitamin D with history of calcareous urolithiasis and urinary calcium excretion <7.5 mmol/day. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups depending on whether they will receive vitamin D replacement with follow-up at 3, 6, 12, & 24 months.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether combining ganetespib (STA-9090) with docetaxel is more effective than docetaxel alone in the treatment of subjects with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
After the fourth protocol amendment two study arms are evaluated in this clinical protocol: PD-0325901 (oral MEK inhibitor) plus PF-05212384 (intravenous PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) and PF-05212384 plus irinotecan. The study will assess safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these combinations in patients with advanced cancer. Once the maximum tolerated doses are identified, further assessment of these combinations will be done in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal or pancreatic cancer for the PF-05212384 plus irinotecan arm and in patients with ovarian cancer or KRAS mutated non small cell lung cancer for the combination of PF-05212384 plus PD-0325901.
This randomised, double-blind phase III trial will be performed in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The objectives of the trial are to compare the efficacy and safety of afatinib (BIBW 2992) with placebo as adjuvant therapy to patients who have received definitive chemo-radiotherapy.