There are about 10004 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Brazil. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with omecamtiv mecarbil when added to standard of care is well tolerated and superior to placebo in reducing the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure events in adults with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
This Phase IIIb, multicenter study will assess the safety of atezolizumab as second- to fourth-line treatment for participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial or non-urothelial cancer of the urinary tract in addition to evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab and potential tumor biomarkers associated with atezolizumab.
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 3 study to evaluate encorafenib + cetuximab plus or minus binimetinib versus Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab, as controls, in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. The study contains a Safety Lead-in Phase in which the safety and tolerability of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab will be assessed prior to the Phase 3 portion of the study.
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to verify the effectiveness of the addition of the dry needling in individuals with non-specific neck pain who receive a multimodal physical therapy rehabilitation program.
In Brazil 10% of the adult population has diabetes. Of these, 39.0% are undiagnosed, at risk for developing complications such as diabetic retinopathy (DR). Due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes and high percentage of patients with uncontrolled disease, cost-effective tools are needed with focused attention on diabetes prevention and management in the current health system. The automatic retinopathy detection can enlarge the screening, reducing the workload and costs compared to manual image graders.
The purpose of this study was to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) / internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) and who were randomized to receive gilteritinib or placebo beginning after completion of induction/consolidation chemotherapy for a two-year period.
Evaluation of a new technique of liver retraction for the exposure of the His angle in gastric bypass Roux-en-Y surgery.
Compare the radiation in pediatric patients thyroid submitted to chest X-ray using the position of the anode and cathode.
Objectives Primary objective: To access the change from baseline to week 12 in MAGE index of glycemic variability measured by CGMS for dapagliflozin versus. gliclazide MR. Secondary objectives: 1. Change from baseline to week 12 in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, postprandial glucose and achievement of HbA1c ≤6.5% and <7% at the end of the study) for dapagliflozin versus gliclazide MR. 2. Change from baseline to week 12 in glycemic variability defined by the interquartile range (IQR - interval between 25th and 75th percentiles) measured by CGMS for dapagliflozin versus gliclazide MR. 3. Change from baseline to week 12 in glycemic variability measured by the Standard Deviation of the mean glycemia (SD) measured by CGMS for dapagliflozin versus gliclazide MR. 4. Change from baseline to week 12 in glycemic variability measured by the Coefficient of Variation (CV) measured by CGMS for dapagliflozin versus gliclazide MR. 5. Change from baseline to week 12 in the time spent on hypoglycemic range (glycemia <70mg/dL) measured by CGMS for dapagliflozin versus gliclazide MR. Study design This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative, phase IV study to compare the effects of gliclazide MR and dapagliflozin on Glycemic Variability in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). All patients should be treatment naïve or receive standard of care therapy for T2DM as well as for co-morbidities based on accepted guidelines and local best practices. Target patient population Approximately 120 patients with T2DM will be randomized from study site. Patients who were treated with metformin only and had inadequate glycemic control at the time of enrollment as well as treatment naïve or non-medically treated (e.g., diet) patients, will be enrolled and receive either dapagliflozin 10mg qd or comparator gliclazide MR 120mg qd in addition to standard of care treatment for T2DM and co-morbidities. Investigational product, dosage and mode of administration Dapagliflozin 10mg tablets administered orally once daily for 12 weeks. Comparator, dosage and mode of administration Gliclazide MR 60mg tablets administered orally, 2 tablets once daily for 12 weeks. Duration of treatment The treatment with study medication or comparator will have a total duration of 15 weeks.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 titrated to a target dose of 200 mg twice daily, compared to ramipril titrated to a target dose of 5 mg twice daily.