Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
NCT ID: NCT03087734 Completed - Funnel Chest Clinical Trials

Evaluation of a New Model of Metallic Bar and Stabilizer for Use in MIRPE

Start date: October 3, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common deformity of the chest wall, occurring in approximately 1/1000 people. Currently, surgical treatment by minimally invasive technique is consolidating as preferred technique for the treatment of this condition. In this technique a metal bar is inserted in retrosternal position, pushing the sternum without the necessity of resecting the condral cartilages. Despite the advantages obtained with this technique, it is not without complications and the displacement of the bar is one of the most important. In order to minimize this problem we developed a new model of stabilizers, as well as all necessary instruments for performing minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study is to compare two surgical groups, one making use of the new oblique stabilizer compared to the conventional perpendicular stabilizer to determine which one has less displacement. Furthermore, this study also aims to assess the full range of instruments developed by a national company, to carry out this type of surgery, which has cost compatible with our economic reality, and that can be accessible to our Public Health patients.

NCT ID: NCT03086759 Completed - Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasm Use in Osteoarthritis of Knee.

Start date: January 2, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a very prevalent disease. However, there are few therapeutic options for its patients. Platelet-rich plasma is a treatment option for chronic pain. If proven to be effective in its intra-articular use, Platelet-rich plasma may help in the treatment of these patients. Goal: Primary objective: To compare effectiveness in improving pain and function and the medium-term tolerance (12 weeks) of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide in patients with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis. Secondary objective: To compare the medium-term effectiveness of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intra-articular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide to improve synovial hypertrophy and quality of life in these patients. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study with three groups (each with n = 33) of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knees who will receive intra-articular infiltration in a single moment. Patients will be allocated to one of three groups: 1) Platelet-rich plasma group: patients who will receive plasma; 2) triamcinolone hexacetonide Group: patients who will receive 40mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide; And 3) Isotonic saline solution group: patients who will receive isotonic saline solution. The patients will be evaluated by "blind" evaluators in 4 assessment times up to 12 weeks of follow-up through clinical assessment instruments (rest and movement pain, joint edema, goniometry, clinical improvement scale, quality of life questionnaire as the SF36), functional (Womac questionnaire, M. Lequesne Functional Knee Index, 6 min walk test, Time up and go test), and ultrasound test (quantitative and semiquantitative measurement of synovial hypertrophy and semiquantitative Power Doppler). Statistics: The following statistical tests will be used according to the need: Student's t test, Mann-whitney, Pearson's chi-square test and ANOVA for repeated measures. A statistical significance of 5% will be considered.

NCT ID: NCT03086590 Completed - Clinical trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

EVALUATION OF RESPIRATORY MECHANICS AND FUNCTIONALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

Start date: November 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To associate a lean mass, peripheral muscle strength, kinematic thoracic-abdominal, respiratory metabolic response, mobility and diaphragmatic thickness, verifying its relation with the obstruction level of COPD

NCT ID: NCT03086343 Completed - Clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs

Start date: May 9, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The study objective of Period 1 was to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) to abatacept on a background of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-inadequate response or bDMARD-intolerant participants with moderately to severely active RA. The study objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD in participants with RA who had completed Period 1.

NCT ID: NCT03086083 Completed - Intervention Study Clinical Trials

Bilateral Brain Stimulation in Trauma Therapy

Start date: October 21, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparatively studied the effects of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) bilateral brain stimulation in trauma therapy. A randomized, parallel, before-after, blind study was performed.

NCT ID: NCT03085810 Completed - Clinical trials for Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Participants With Early Stage Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)

Start date: March 24, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3b study which evaluates effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in participants with early stage RRMS. The study will consist of an open-label treatment period of 192 weeks and follow-up period of at least 48 weeks. The optional shorter infusion substudy will evaluate the safety of a shorter infusion of ocrelizumab in a subgroup of participants with early stage RRMS enrolled in the main MA30143 study. Approximately 700 patients will be enrolled in the substudy, and will receive additional 600 mg ocrelizumab administered in a shorter time frame.

NCT ID: NCT03085355 Completed - Neck Pain Clinical Trials

Evaluation of the Effect of the OMT Exercises Education for Pain in Participants With Cervical Pain

Start date: June 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this randomized pragmatic clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of the association of the osteopathic manipulative treatment in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain who receive a exercice program and pain neurocience education.

NCT ID: NCT03085095 Completed - Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Relugolix in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer

HERO
Start date: April 18, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of relugolix 120 milligrams (mg) orally once daily for 48 weeks on maintaining serum testosterone suppression to castrate levels (< 50 nanograms/deciliter [ng/dL]) in participants with androgen-sensitive advanced prostate cancer.

NCT ID: NCT03084094 Completed - Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials

Neuromodulation and Its Therapeutic Potentiality in Different Populations

Start date: October 17, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

One of the big challenges faced by researchers who act in rehabilitation science is the capacity to dispose integrative approaches for its utilization in clinical practice. The border profile of a physiotherapy researcher is to be in front of applied research amplification in experimental integrative approaches, involving the study of behavioral and physiological variables. The rehabilitation process transcends the systems physiology and encompasses the cognitive behavioral feature of being adapted to the environment that surround us. It is now known by the scientific rehabilitation community the necessity for evidence based therapies and even more, therapeutic innovation. In both conditions, of health and illness, various options to use integrative approaches are today available in physiotherapy, including behavioral and physiological profiles of the individuals during physical activities, response to stress and in the field of chronic pain. It is in the clinical routine of numerous rehabilitation centers the treatment of diseases that causes pain, being the leading figure in a physiotherapist work process. The innovative study of resources that can alter the pain state of this patients becomes primordial for routine clinical use, low cost and easy to apply. The therapeutic treatment for pain offered by a physiotherapist need new investigative options based in evidences from the association between the neuronal, behavioral and physiological responses where the brain is the central organ of this regulation. In this context, become increasingly more necessary the construction of investigative approaches in the purpose of reaching the clinical practice, in a reduced time lapse, once the great volume of information produced globally does not impact in short or medium term in new therapeutic recommendations. Among the various chronic painful entities, it is presented the fibromyalgia (FM), painful diabetic polyneuropathy and primary dysmenorrhea because of its painful pathogenic complexity and its limited therapeutic against pain in rehabilitation process. The 3 painful entities presents the central nervous system as main participant of neurogenesis and maintenance of the painful state. It is primordial importance that rehabilitation science improve methods of non invasive brain neuromodulation that allows, through excitation or inhibition of specific cortical areas in order to produce pain inhibition, providing a simple and low cost treatment to clinical routine. Technological advances and non invasive techniques to modulate brain function has been developed, among which transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) stands out. Basically, electrodes are placed in targeted brain regions that you want to stimulate or inhibit. Posteriorly, is applied a continuous electric current (0,4 - 2 mA) for a 3-20 minutes period, in order to modify cortical excitability. The stimulus of the anodic current increases cortical excitability whereas the stimulus of the cathodic current has an inhibitory effect. Few are the research groups that address the issue of fibromyalgia, painful diabetic polyneuropathy and primary dysmenorrhea and the application of tDCS as research focus, being a border area for rehabilitation science and great potential in clinical use. Preliminary studies associates the use of tDCS with the decrease of painful state, however an approach of physical function and behavioral results needs greater investigation. The purpose of the presented project is to present the tDCS as a new modality in physical rehabilitation for the patient with chronic pain of the 3 entities mentioned above. The study proposal is to present behavioral, social and physical results of tDCS application in this patients, suggesting a better quality of life and functionality of the individual.

NCT ID: NCT03082248 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Second Opinion in Spinal Surgery Indications: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Start date: September 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Low back pain is a common symptom, which often affects the adult population. Studies show that over the past two decades, costs related to spinal surgery have increased significantly, leading to speculation about what would be motivating this phenomenon. Although expenses with physical therapy treatments and less invasive surgical procedures remained relatively stable, the amount spent with more complex spine surgeries increased exponentially until they became the procedures with the highest costs in healthcare. The criteria for surgical indication are not uniform among surgeons and therefore a study of second opinion in spine surgeries is urgently needed. The present study aims to 1) quantify cost-effectiveness of second opinion for patients with spinal surgery indication 2) evaluate effectiveness of conservative and surgical treatment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine 3) define objective criteria for indication of conservative and surgical treatment using evidence-based medicine 4) evaluate prognosis of biological markers in the follow-up of patients with lumbar affections 5) evaluate interobserver agreement of physicians in relation to the diagnoses and treatment proposals in patients with diseases of the lumbar spine 6) verify effectiveness of patients who were operated on, compared to patients who were not operated. A prospective cohort study will be conducted, in which patients with an indication of surgical spinal treatment will be evaluated for a second opinion. First evaluation diagnoses and indications for patient treatment will be compared with the second opinion evaluation. All patients who choose to participate on the study will be followed up for a year for evaluations concerning cost-effectiveness, pain, quality of life, function and blood biomarkers. The outcomes will be compared using linear or generalized mixed models and descriptive analyzes of the study population program will be carried out; Statistical agreement will be observed between the first and second opinion and also patient acceptance rates for the treatment proposed in the second indication, evaluating the validity of the project approach. A five-year budget impact analysis will also be carried out, taking into account the population who was eligible for treatment according to the admission flow of a private outpatient setting.