There are about 13446 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Belgium. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Study objectives Primary objective: This study wants to evaluate the safety of a latex safe protocol as proposed by the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. In other words,the investigators hope to demonstrate that patients with known latex allergy or latex sensitisation can be treated safely in operating theatres without special requirements towards scheduling provided that all powdered latex gloves are removed from the OR environment( preparation rooms, theatres, recovery room and surroundings). In contrast, earlier guidelines require the theatre to be left unused during at least 3 hours before a patient with suspected latex allergy can be operated on in this theatre. Secondary objectives: - The investigators want to evaluate to what extend patients who report a latex allergy show risk factors of latex allergy. - To investigate to what extend latex allergy was proven by laboratory testing or skin testing in patients who report a latex allergy. - Type of latex allergic reaction when patients report a latex allergy. - The level of satisfaction of surgeons and OR scheduling staff with the new latex safe protocol and with the switching to powder free latex gloves.
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions up to 140 mm in length. Long Lesion Substudy: to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions >140 mm and ≤ 190 mm in length.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan to the treatment of physician's choice (TPC) as measured by independently-reviewed Independent Review Committee (IRC) progression-free survival (PFS) in participants with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) previously treated with at least two systemic chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease, and without brain metastasis at baseline.
This extension study will provide data to further evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three doses of BYM338 and to assess the long-term effects of BYM338 in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis. The extension study was planned to consist of a Screening epoch (to assess patient eligibility), followed by a Treatment Period 1 epoch (double-blind and placebo-controlled), and a Treatment Period 2 epoch (open-label). A Post-treatment Follow-up (FUP) epoch was also planned for patients who discontinued prematurely. Patients who complete the core study and qualify for this extension study entered Treatment Period 1 and continued on the study drug to which they were randomized in the core study (either to one of the three bimagrumab doses (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10mg/kg) or placebo) during Treatment Period 1. Thus, Treatment Period 1 was double-blind and placebo-controlled. Participants were to continue in Treatment Period 1 until the dose with the best benefit-risk profile was determined from the core study data and selected (duration of Treatment Period 1 was estimated to be between 6 and 8 months). Once the dose with the best benefit-risk profile was selected, all participants (including those who were receiving placebo) were planned to enter Treatment Period 2 and switch to open-label treatment with bimagrumab at the selected dose. The core study has been completed but since the core study did not meet the primary end point (no bimagrumab dose was identified based on the core study efficacy results) the extension study was terminated as per protocol/sponsor's decision; therefore, no patients had entered Treatment Period 2. Instead, all patients were to return for the End of Treatment Period 1 (EOT1) visit at their next scheduled visit. As per protocol, all patients who discontinued study medication during Treatment Period 1 for any reason, including due to the study having been stopped as per protocol/sponsor's decision, were to have entered and complete the 6-month FUP after their EOT1 visit. Due to the nature of the design of the core and extension studies and termination of study medication in the extension study, the treatment duration for individual patients varied considerably. Consequently, the number of patients contributing data to the efficacy analyses at Week 104 and later timepoints was decreased.
This study seeks to determine whether the addition of ABT-414 to concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by combination of ABT-414 with adjuvant TMZ prolongs overall survival (OS) among participants with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification. In addition, there is a Phase 1, open-label, multicenter sub-study to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ABT-414 in participants with newly diagnosed EGFR-amplified GBM who have mild or moderate hepatic impairment.
This prospective cohort study aims to determine the incidence of hospitalization-associated disability and its association with risk factors at the patient level and with care and hospital processes. For this, patients aged 70 years or older admitted for elective valve surgery or elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation or as a result of symptomatic moderate to severe valvular heart disease will be consecutively included from 01 October 2015 to 29 February 2016.
The purpose of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of QVM149 (QVM149 150/50/80 μg and QVM149 150/50/160 μg via Concept1) over two respective QMF149 doses (QMF149 150/160 μg and QMF149 150/320) μg via Concept1 in poorly controlled asthmatics as determined by pulmonary function testing and effects on asthma control.
The Ablative Solutions, Inc. Peregrine System Infusion Catheter is a catheter-based device which is intended to be used to ablate the afferent and efferent sympathetic nerves serving the kidneys. The catheter is inserted via the femoral artery, steered into the renal artery, and then delivers, by infusion from its distal end, a neurolytic agent. This targets the nerve bundles, which are in the adventitia - a sheath surrounding the artery. The aim is to reduce blood pressure in cases of hypertension, including seriously elevated blood pressure which does not respond to drug treatment. This study will evaluate the safety and performance of the device.
The current study will be conducted in healthy adult subjects to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitor and food on pharmacokinetics of PF-06463922, to evaluate the bioavailability of the oral solution relative to the tablet formulation of PF-06463922.
This is a clinical non-randomized prospective study. This study had two objectives. The fist one was to determine the interest of breast cancer patients in participating in one of three group interventions (CBT, yoga or self-hypnosis) by assessing the participation rate, the reasons for choosing a particular group or decline the offer. The second objective was to evaluate and compare the benefits of these three interventions on emotional distress, QoL, sleep quality and mental adjustment to cancer, at three times after the end of the interventions (just after the end, at a 3-month and at a 9-month follow-up).