View clinical trials related to Chronic Wound.
Filter by:The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to test the efficacy and safety of a bioglass wound dressing in patients with chronic wound in different stages. The main question it aims to answer are: - Whether the bioglass wound dressing have better efficacy and safety than blank control in treatment of chronic wound in necrosis stable stage？ - Whether the bioglass wound dressing have better efficacy and safety than blank control in treatment of chronic wound in granulation growth stage？ Participants will be assigned with a 1:1 ratio into intervention group and control group. Participants of intervention group will receive bioglass wound dressing in addition with clinical optimal treatment plan. Participants of control group will only receive clinical optimal treatment plan.
Chronic wounds are wounds or ulcers that do not heal properly and are generally classified as venous, arterial, diabetic, traumatic and pressure chronic wounds and is often associated with inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Preliminary clinical studies have confirmed that injection of freshly prepared HA35 promoted the healing of chronic wounds and relieved the pain associated with chronic wounds. This clinical study is a prospective repeated experiments. The purpose of this study was to verify the effectiveness of HA35 injection therapy.
A small-scale study using interviews to explore patients', carers' and health care professionals' experience of pain relief strategies currently used in UK practice for dressing change in chronic wounds.
This study aims to discover, verify and evaluate the potential biomarkers with regard to the diagnosis, prognostic and/or prediction of diabetic chronic wounds.
ART (Autologous Regeneration of Tissue) is a revolutionary technology for harvesting skin without the drawbacks of conventional grafting. This innovative system allows the clinician to collect hundreds of microcolumns of full-thickness skin tissue and apply them directly to the wound site. It can all be done in an outpatient setting with minimized donor site concerns.
Objectives: The study objective is to carry a pilot clinical assessment comparing the exciflex bandage to standard of care (SoC) for ischemic wounds and will involve participants who are Veterans with lower extremity ischemic wounds. Research Plan: The study will employ a randomized repeated measures design to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of exciflex in clinical use. Methodology: All participants with chronic ischemic wounds treated at LSCDVAMC will be potentially eligible for the study. Primary target populations will include Veterans with SCI who are inpatients or residents of the on-site Long Term Care Unit and Veterans with diabetes being followed by the Podiatry Service for wound care. In addition to meeting the general inclusion criteria noted above, further exclusion criteria relating to clinical factors include; (1)Age less than 18 years and (2)Pregnancy. Clinical Significance: Chronic ischemic wounds fail to heal normally and are a major challenge in the long-term care of many Veterans. The exciflex bandage can improve outcomes and lower cost by automatically delivering electrotherapy without disturbing the wound dressing for up to seven days, unless indicated. The overall study goal is to complete pre-market testing and evaluation of the exciflex bandage system.
Chronic wounds are common and carry out an important and often neglected burden not only to the individual, the family but also to the society as a whole. The therapeutic approach to the management of chronic wounds include wound bed preparation or wound dressing management. Wound bed preparation is a concept emphasizing a holistic and systematic approach to evaluate and remove barriers to the healing process to allow the wound healing process to progress normally. Debridement is an integrated part of wound bed preparation, achieving certain goals and, thus, creating a healthy wound bed, margins and peri-wound skin with the objective to promote and accelerate healing. Debridement is defined as the removal of foreign material and necrotic tissue from a wound and it can also help to stimulate wound healing. However, not all methods of debridement are the same. Each method has advantages and disadvantages that must be clearly understood. In the present clinical practice, there are several methods of wound debridement: autolytic, enzymatic, mechanical, surgical (sharp) and biologic. The most common method is the mechanical debridement. Currently a micro-water jet technique was introduced into clinical practice. The micro-water jet technique Debritom+ is an effective alternative to traditional instrument interventions performed with the scalpel and/or curette. A sterile liquid is expelled from a nozzle at a selected intensity and accurately sprayed onto the wound surface. The desired effect is the generation of targeted micro-bleedings to stimulate regeneration and healing processes while preserving the underlying healthy tissue. Today, there is no clinical evidence quantitatively comparing one debridement method over the other. Therefore the invesitgators propose a pilot study to measure the extent of tissue loss after debridement using Debritom+ micro-water jet technology versus traditional instrument debridement procedure using scalpel and curette.
Double layer artificial dermis repair material has been widely used in scar plastic, burn, trauma, chronic wounds and other aspects of wound repair and reconstruction. In the course of clinical application, we found that for chronic wounds, the combination of artificial dermis and growth factor can shorten the wound healing cycle, and have a positive impact on the economy and psychology of patients. In order to verify this effect, we plan to carry out this study to evaluate whether double-layer artificial dermis repair material combined with growth factor treatment can improve wound closure rate and shorten closure cycle compared with single artificial dermis for chronic wound.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wound sizing and completeness in chronic window treatment, and to confirm the superiority of area reduction in CG Paste and form-dressing as compared to form-dressing alone groups and CG Paste and form-dressing companion groups.