View clinical trials related to Chronic Wound.
Filter by:The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
A small-scale study using interviews to explore patients', carers' and health care professionals' experience of pain relief strategies currently used in UK practice for dressing change in chronic wounds.
This study aims to discover, verify and evaluate the potential biomarkers with regard to the diagnosis, prognostic and/or prediction of diabetic chronic wounds.
Objectives: The study objective is to carry a pilot clinical assessment comparing the exciflex bandage to standard of care (SoC) for ischemic wounds and will involve participants who are Veterans with lower extremity ischemic wounds. Research Plan: The study will employ a randomized repeated measures design to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of exciflex in clinical use. Methodology: All participants with chronic ischemic wounds treated at LSCDVAMC will be potentially eligible for the study. Primary target populations will include Veterans with SCI who are inpatients or residents of the on-site Long Term Care Unit and Veterans with diabetes being followed by the Podiatry Service for wound care. In addition to meeting the general inclusion criteria noted above, further exclusion criteria relating to clinical factors include; (1)Age less than 18 years and (2)Pregnancy. Clinical Significance: Chronic ischemic wounds fail to heal normally and are a major challenge in the long-term care of many Veterans. The exciflex bandage can improve outcomes and lower cost by automatically delivering electrotherapy without disturbing the wound dressing for up to seven days, unless indicated. The overall study goal is to complete pre-market testing and evaluation of the exciflex bandage system.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wound sizing and completeness in chronic window treatment, and to confirm the superiority of area reduction in CG Paste and form-dressing as compared to form-dressing alone groups and CG Paste and form-dressing companion groups.