Use of Clorhexidine Dressings to Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Breast Cancer Surgery. A Controlled Clinical Trial

Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Breast Cancer Surgery With Clorhexidine Gluconate Securement Dressing (Tegaderm CHG)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03229824
• Other study ID #: CEI/1090/16
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 3, 2016
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: November 2018
• Source: National Institute of Cancerología
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Surgical site infection (SSI) after breast and axillary surgery occurs more often than for other clean surgical procedures. Infection in the setting of sick woman could delay the adjuvant therapy and result increase morbidity and mortality. Also this increased costs associated with health care.Surgical drains have been noted as a potential source for surgical site infections. The primary aim of the study is to determine if chlorhexidine occlusive dressings applied to the intervention drain sites effectively decreases rates of bacterial colonization in drain fluid and drain tips compared to standard care.

Description:

Following approval by the National Cancer Institute Review Board, eligible subjects will be recruited prospectively from the Breast Cancer Department at National Cancer Institute, México from November 2016 to November 2017. Individuals with confirmed cancer undergoing total mastectomy (TM), modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in which surgical drains are going to be used will be identified through the surgical scheduling sheet. If the subjects are eligible according to the inclusion criteria, the will be interviewed by one of the main researchers. In the initial interview the informed consent will be read and signed. Also the study coordinator will collect the data of interest from the medical records and will register it in a data collection sheet specially created for this project.

Following informed consent, participants will be randomize to either the standard drain care regimen or the drain antisepsis regimen by a computerized randomization program, using dynamic allocation and stratifying by surgical procedure (radical surgery or conservative surgery). Subjects who had bilateral cancer underwent to the same regimen for both sides. The operating surgeon will know the assigned treatment arm at the end of the surgery.

The surgery will consist on placing a chlorhexidine gluconate occlusive adhesive dressing to the drains side at the end of the surgery. The dressing will be changed each 7 (+-1) days until the drain is removed.

All the participants and the principal take-carers, despite of the group of participation, will be personal instructed by a member of the research team in the first hours of the postoperative, before the departure. In addition, they will be given paper based instructions for the general care of the drain and the surgery wound.

For the experimental group, the dressing will be changed each 7(+-1) days; The site of the insertion must be cleaned with 70% concentration isopropyl alcohol towels. The evaluation and quantification of the drained fluid will be done every 12 hours as it is done usually in these patients.

The patients will be followed for 30 days from the surgery until the resolution of the infectious complication, if it occurs. The patients will go at the end of the first postoperative week (POP 7+-1). In each visit, the coordinator of the study will register the information of the patient in the register sheet. In each visit the patient will be evaluated, the characteristics of the surgical wound and the characteristics of drain fluid will be consigned in the protocol register sheet. The investigator will verify that the participants have correctly done the clean-up the drain.

All patients will undergo semiquantitative cultures of the drain bulb at the first and second week postoperative. Also the investigators will take the distal part of the internal segment of each removed drainage tube for semiquantitative culture. All participants will be evaluated for clinical signs of infection and for any adverse reactions to the drain antisepsis at the follow-up visits. In case of a surgical site infection, the patient will receive the right treatment and will remain in surveillance until the resolution.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 116
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: April 30, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Females minimum age 18 able to give informed consent

• Breast cancer confirmed by histopathology

• Patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with or without immediate expander reconstruction.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Males

• Patients who deny informed consent

• Prior radiation therapy to the sick breast.

• Pregnant or breastfeeding women

• Patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with Deep Inferior

• Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) o Transverse Rectus Abdominal Muscle techniques (TRAM) .

• Emergency procedures

• Documented allergy to chlorhexidine gluconate

• Antibiotic use in the fourteen days prior to surgical date

• Patients with a history or suspicion of breast cancer surgery outside the INCan in the previous three months.

• Patients who do not speak spanish, diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder and in whom a minimum follow-up of 14 days couldn't be feasible because of operative difficulties (eg.

place of residence or reference to other health institutions).

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Breast Cancer
• Breast Neoplasms
• Infection
• Surgical Wound Infection

Intervention

Device:
• Antiseptic occlusive dressing group
A chlorhexidine gluconate occlusive adhesive dressing (Tegaderm CHG) will be applied to the intervention drain sites and changed every seven days.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Mexico	Instituto Nacional de Cancerología	Mexico City	DF

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National Institute of Cancerología	Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Mexico, 

References & Publications (31)

Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, Nyquist AC, Saiman L, Yokoe DS, Maragakis LL, Kaye KS. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):605-27. doi: 10.1086/676022. — View Citation

Arce et al. Oncoguía: Cáncer de Mama. Cancerología 6, 2001; p77-86.

Barbadoro P, Marmorale C, Recanatini C, Mazzarini G, Pellegrini I, D'Errico MM, Prospero E; Drainages Collaborative Working Group. May the drain be a way in for microbes in surgical infections? Am J Infect Control. 2016 Mar 1;44(3):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 21. — View Citation

Degnim AC, Hoskin TL, Brahmbhatt RD, Warren-Peled A, Loprinzi M, Pavey ES, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Jacobson S, Lemaine V, Jakub JW, Irwin C, Foster RD, Sbitany H, Saint-Cyr M, Duralde E, Ramaker S, Chin R, Sieg M, Wildeman M, Scow JS, Patel R, Ballman K, Baddour LM, Esserman LJ. Randomized trial of drain antisepsis after mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3240-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3918-9. Epub 2014 Aug 6. — View Citation

Degnim AC, Scow JS, Hoskin TL, Miller JP, Loprinzi M, Boughey JC, Jakub JW, Throckmorton A, Patel R, Baddour LM. Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):240-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c0b85. — View Citation

Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Dec;37(10):783-805. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.001. — View Citation

Felippe WA, Werneck GL, Santoro-Lopes G. Surgical site infection among women discharged with a drain in situ after breast cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2293-9; discussion 2300-1. — View Citation

Guembe M, Martín-Rabadán P, Cruces R, Pérez Granda MJ, Bouza E. Sonicating multi-lumen sliced catheter tips after the roll-plate technique improves the detection of catheter colonization in adults. J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Mar;122:20-2. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Erratum in: J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Aug;127:242. — View Citation

Hedrick TL, Smith PW, Gazoni LM, Sawyer RG. The appropriate use of antibiotics in surgery: a review of surgical infections. Curr Probl Surg. 2007 Oct;44(10):635-75. Review. — View Citation

Instituto Nacional de Geografía y estadística. "Estadísticas a propósito del día mundial de la lucha contra el cáncer de mama (19 de octubre)". Recuperado el 15 de febrero del 2016, de www.inegi.org.mx/aproposito/mama0

Jones DJ, Bunn F, Bell-Syer SV. Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 9;(3):CD005360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005360.pub4. Review. — View Citation

Jost GF, Wasner M, Taub E, Walti L, Mariani L, Trampuz A. Sonication of catheter tips for improved detection of microorganisms on external ventricular drains and ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Apr;21(4):578-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.05.025. Epub 2013 Aug 14. — View Citation

Landes G, Harris PG, Lemaine V, Perreault I, Sampalis JS, Brutus JP, Lessard L, Dionyssopoulos A, Nikolis A. Prevention of surgical site infection and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing habits in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Nov;61(11):1347-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Jun 16. — View Citation

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96. — View Citation

Olsen MA, Chu-Ongsakul S, Brandt KE, Dietz JR, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ. Hospital-associated costs due to surgical site infection after breast surgery. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):53-60; discussion 61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.11. — View Citation

Olsen MA, Lefta M, Dietz JR, Brandt KE, Aft R, Matthews R, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):326-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.021. Epub 2008 Jun 26. — View Citation

Penel N, Yazdanpanah Y, Chauvet MP, Clisant S, Giard S, Neu JC, Lefebvre D, Fournier C, Bonneterre J. Prevention of surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery by targeted prophylaxis antibiotic in patients at high risk of surgical site infection. J Surg Oncol. 2007 Aug 1;96(2):124-9. Erratum in: J Surg Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;97(5):479. Nicolas, Penel [corrected to Penel, Nicolas]; Yazdan, Yazdanpanah [corrected to Yazdanpanah, Yazdan]; Marie-Pierre, Chauvet [corrected to Chauvet, Marie-Pierre]; Stéphanie Clisant [corrected to Clisant, Stéphanie]; Sylvia, Giard [corrected to Giard, Sylv. — View Citation

Prospero E, Cavicchi A, Bacelli S, Barbadoro P, Tantucci L, D'Errico MM. Surveillance for surgical site infection after hospital discharge: a surgical procedure-specific perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;27(12):1313-7. Epub 2006 Nov 21. — View Citation

Purushotham AD, McLatchie E, Young D, George WD, Stallard S, Doughty J, Brown DC, Farish C, Walker A, Millar K, Murray G. Randomized clinical trial of no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2002 Mar;89(3):286-92. — View Citation

Ruvalcaba-Limón E, Robles-Vidal C, Poitevin-Chacón A, Chávez-Macgregor M, Gamboa-Vignolle C, Vilar-Compte D. Complications after breast cancer surgery in patients treated with concomitant preoperative chemoradiation: A case-control analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Jan;95(2):147-52. Epub 2005 Dec 1. — View Citation

Sankar B, Ray P, Rai J. Suction drain tip culture in orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study of 214 clean operations. Int Orthop. 2004 Oct;28(5):311-4. Epub 2004 Aug 14. — View Citation

Simchen E, Rozin R, Wax Y. The Israeli Study of Surgical Infection of drains and the risk of wound infection in operations for hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Apr;170(4):331-7. — View Citation

Throckmorton AD, Boughey JC, Boostrom SY, Holifield AC, Stobbs MM, Hoskin T, Baddour LM, Degnim AC. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics and surgical site infection rates in breast surgery patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;16(9):2464-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0542-1. Epub 2009 Jun 9. — View Citation

Throckmorton AD, Hoskin T, Boostrom SY, Boughey JC, Holifield AC, Stobbs MM, Baddour LM, Degnim AC. Complications associated with postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after breast surgery. Am J Surg. 2009 Oct;198(4):553-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.003. — View Citation

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4. — View Citation

Vilar-Compte D, Jacquemin B, Robles-Vidal C, Volkow P. Surgical site infections in breast surgery: case-control study. World J Surg. 2004 Mar;28(3):242-6. Epub 2004 Feb 17. — View Citation

Vilar-Compte D, Mohar A, Sandoval S, de la Rosa M, Gordillo P, Volkow P. Surgical site infections at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico: a case-control study. Am J Infect Control. 2000 Feb;28(1):14-20. — View Citation

Vilar-Compte D, Roldán-Marín R, Robles-Vidal C, Volkow P. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates among patients who underwent mastectomy after the introduction of SSI prevention policies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;27(8):829-34. Epub 2006 Jul 20. — View Citation

Vilar-Compte D, Rosales S, Hernandez-Mello N, Maafs E, Volkow P. Surveillance, control, and prevention of surgical site infections in breast cancer surgery: a 5-year experience. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Jun 24. — View Citation

Weichman KE, Clavin NW, Miller HC, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ. Does the use of biopatch devices at drain sites reduce perioperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):9e-17e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000810. — View Citation

XXXIII Congreso Nacional de la Asociación Mexicana de Infectología y Microbiología Clínica, A.C. León, Guanajuato; 14-17 de mayo de 2008.

* Note: There are 31 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of subjects with drain bulb fluid bacterial colonization at the first and second week postoperative.	Bacterial growth was defined as plate growth >10*5 colony forming unit (CFU). Drains were removed at variable times across patients, per clinical indication. When clinically indicated, some patients did have their drains removed at the one week visit, in which case they only had one bulb fluid culture.	Approximately 1 or 2 weeks after surgery
Primary	Number of subjects with drain tip bacterial colonization at removal.	Bacterial growth was defined as plate growth >15 CFU by semiquantitative technique or >10*5 CFU by sonication and fluid culture. Drains were removed at variable times across patients, per clinical indication.	Approximately at the second and/or third week after surgery
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Surgical Site Infection Within 30 Days	Surgical site infection was diagnosed according the definitions given by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).	Approximately 30 days after surgery